• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Football

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
Another big nation and previous winner gone. I know we are all 'taking it one match at a time' but seriously, have England ever had a better chance of reaching a World Cup final?
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Another big nation and previous winner gone. I know we are all 'taking it one match at a time' but seriously, have England ever had a better chance of reaching a World Cup final?
Not since 1990 for sure. Still Uruguay and France (and Columbia of course!) to contend with though, and don't underestimate England's ability to screw things up!

Russia might end up doing a "Greece 2004". If they can do it (cleanly!) it'll be one of the biggest stories of the history of the World Cup.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,892
Location
Fenny Stratford
OBVIOUSLY England will be eliminated by Columbia. On penalties. Obviously.

However, anyone still in the world cup has a chance of winning it. Croatia have been excellent thus far but the way things are going they will crash out.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,293
Location
LBK
Another big nation and previous winner gone. I know we are all 'taking it one match at a time' but seriously, have England ever had a better chance of reaching a World Cup final?

I would say their chances are the same as they’ve ever been. The opposition is weaker but the England squad is too, by the same margin, I think.
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
What a game, Spain got what they deserved, passing the ball sideways does not win football matches.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,400
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
That means nowt. If Russia had played a good team rather than a completely useless one the result would have been different. Russia scored some good goals but looked weak, especially at the back where they are relying on 38 year old Sergei Ignashevich. Love to see him isolated one on one or pulled out into a channel v a speed merchant. Russia are a poor team in poor form regardless of a 5-0 win over a very poor team.

After my recent admonishments on the Football thread, perhaps I need to inwardly digest such gems of football wisdom as stated above in an earlier posting on the thread.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,816
Location
Stirlingshire
Just tuned into ITV for the Croatia v Denmark tie.

Has anyone else noticed Pougatch, O'Neill and Dixon are all BBC trained.

Should the BBC broadcast all England games as I notice Tuesdays is on ITV - given a choice most people opt for BBC.

Denmark 1-0 - one minute
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Just tuned into ITV for the Croatia v Denmark tie.

Has anyone else noticed Pougatch, O'Neill and Dixon are all BBC trained.

Should the BBC broadcast all England games as I notice Tuesdays is on ITV - given a choice most people opt for BBC.

Denmark 1-0 - one minute
Coverage of world cup games is either/or, apart from the final which is on both. AIUI the coverage is allocated before the tournament starts, so it's pot-luck whether England's games will be on the BBC or ITV. The beeb are better IMO, but that isn't saying much!

The Denmark goal was the first EVER goal at a World Cup finals scored by a Huddersfield Town player, though he shoulders some responsibility for the equaliser.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,892
Location
Fenny Stratford
After my recent admonishments on the Football thread, perhaps I need to inwardly digest such gems of football wisdom as stated above in an earlier posting on the thread.

Paul - at least I am willing to offer an opinion. You are a professional fence sitter who seems terrified of being wrong. As a test here is a simple on for you. Name the country you think will win the 2018 football World Cup.

The point, which you understood entirely, at the time of the quoted post was that Russia had played a very poor Saudi side and won easily. It was no basis to judge the quality of the Russian team.

Russia have done really well but I expected them to lose today. At the start of the tournament their own people expected them to be a joke. Their media was completely against them and considered them hopeless and most people prepared to offer an opinion considered them also rans. They have done fantastically well to reach the quarter finals. They aren't a great side but they are well organised, well drilled and very disciplined. They are, however, very vulnerable to players running at them with the ball. Wales casued them great damage at the Euros by doing just that. It took Spain far to long to work that out today. Russia were very happy to let Spain have the ball and pass it about. Spain hoped they could drag a Russian defender out of position and allow their superior passing skills to create a chance. Russia just refused to move out of shape and Spain kept trying the same approach for about 100 minutes! Until that point the tempo of the game suited Russia being far too slow. Russia can not cope with pace. That Spain couldn't figure that out is amazing! Russia showed no intent to win the game and played for penalties. That plan worked. A potentially dodgy VAR decision with moments left was also very helpful.

It is also worth noting that Spain are not playing well at present and manged to lose their manager days before the finals began.

Should the BBC broadcast all England games as I notice Tuesdays is on ITV - given a choice most people opt for BBC.

ITV are awful. They a should be prohibited from covering football. Especially England.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,400
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Paul - at least I am willing to offer an opinion. You are a professional fence sitter who seems terrified of being wrong. As a test here is a simple on for you. Name the country you think will win the 2018 football World Cup.

Terrified of being wrong. Not so, I see no rhyme nor reason in attempting to perform that task you ask. I tend to follow the Italian adage...."Que sera,sera"
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Now that a few of the likely contenders have been eliminated, I'm making a prediction of the eventual winners. If I'm wrong I won't lose any sleep, it's just a bit of fun.
I sort of get where Paul is coming from- predictions have the possibility to make fools of anyone... but I'm not afraid of being made to look a fool- if I was, I'd never leave my flat!

France would appear to be the front-runners, so predicting them as winners would be far too obvious. Belgium for me.
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,816
Location
Stirlingshire
After a lively start this match has become a bore - can we not go straight to penalties and bypass another 30 minutes extra time drudge ?
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Just tuned into ITV for the Croatia v Denmark tie.

Has anyone else noticed Pougatch, O'Neill and Dixon are all BBC trained.

Should the BBC broadcast all England games as I notice Tuesdays is on ITV - given a choice most people opt for BBC.

Denmark 1-0 - one minute

The BBC should broadcast all World Cup games. They've managed to stream every BBC 1 game in UHD on iPlayer, have broadcast all their games in HD on free platforms (unlike ITV's as ITV4 HD is not available on freeview). More subjectively they've had better commentators and analysts. This is not even mentioning their radio coverage which ITV flat out doesn't do.

What would be nice if a choice was given, not just for the world cup but for all sports broadcasting. The domestic leagues in football are aware and deliberately parcel the games so they can make more money at the expense of viewers. You don't need be good if you're the only option!


ITV are awful. They a should be prohibited from covering football. Especially England.

I'd still rather have ITV than it be behind a paid subscription service. There is always the option of muting the game and drawing one's own conclusions. This is especially good for England games where all commentators and pundits are seemingly unable to simply tell you what's happening on the pitch. I must have been in a very small minority in watching Tunisia play Panama last Thursday (even in low definition)

Semi-related but if I had my way football broadcasters would only be allowed to talk about the game they're covering.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
Late drama in tonight's game as Croatia get a penalty but it's saved by Schmichael (spelling?) but it's saved.

Surely the Danish defender should have been sent off for the tackle leading to the penalty - seemed very much denying a goal scoring opportunity

edit: Penalties (again) so of course ITV, in their infinite wisdom, break up the tension with an ad break
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247
Surely the Danish defender should have been sent off for the tackle leading to the penalty - seemed very much denying a goal scoring opportunity

The new 'double jeopardy' rules state that a player can't be sent off if a penalty is awarded against them (or something along those lines anyway)
 

Antman

Established Member
Joined
3 May 2013
Messages
6,840
The new 'double jeopardy' rules state that a player can't be sent off if a penalty is awarded against them (or something along those lines anyway)

The player had made a genuine attempt to get the ball.
 

BlueFox

Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
764
Location
Carlisle
The new 'double jeopardy' rules state that a player can't be sent off if a penalty is awarded against them (or something along those lines anyway)

Only if they're making a genuine attempt to win the ball. So if he'd got nowhere near the ball, pulled his shirt or handled the ball to stop it going in it would have been a red card.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,293
Location
LBK
If they make a genuine attempt to win the ball I believe.

Correct. Although I don’t believe the Danish player had any chance of *not* committing a foul. He was behind the player with no prospect of playing the ball fairly in the situation.

Should have been a red. Professional foul.
 

The_Train

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2018
Messages
5,247

Top