Taking Burslem to Hanley as an example, the new timetable has 74 journeys per day compared to 73 currently, however this seems to be from a couple of earlier buses and a better evening service.
Between 8am and 6pm there are currently 60 journeys from Burslem to Hanley this drops to 52 under the new timetable.
At present the average day time journey from Burslem to Hanley is 11 minutes, this increases to between 15 and 18 minutes next month.
The biggest gap I can see is a 22 minute gap between services from 1349 to 1411, there is also a 21 minute gap between departures from 0822 and 0843 - right in the middle of the rush hour.
A 103 and a 38 both leave Burslem for Hanley at 0920 but for some reason the 103 does the journey 1 minute quicker.
Currently if I go online looking for the timetables I only need to look up or print off 1 timetable, now I need to look up or print off 3 different timetables.
The majority of journeys will involve both longer waiting times and longer journey times. I can't see how this will encourage more passengers on board.
Big increases in journey times seem to be a feature of these AI timetables.
As well as Burslem to Hanley, I see Hanley to Newcastle increases from 22 minutes all day on the 4/4A to 25/26 minutes off peak and up to 31 minutes peak on the new 38; there are mid-afternoon journeys from Crewe on the 103 which take 90 minutes vs 69 in the current timetable, the 25 gets 10-15 minutes extra on some journeys.
There's also now a 27 minute gap in buses arriving at Keele between 0826 and 0853, which is caused by a 17 minute difference in running times for buses which leave Hanley 10 minutes apart. I don't know Keele Uni but that seems like a bad idea if lectures start at 9?
Are the current timetables impossible to keep or are these new times going to have buses spending half the time standing at timing points? I know here in Lancashire some of the extra time First are giving their buses seems unnecessary.