MCW
Member
Which nicely proves my point that the operators really can't do anything right in the eyes of some posters on these boards.
If they use old vehicles - that's wrong because they should be providing nice, new shiny vehicles.
But if they dare to replace some of the oldest vehicles on their fleet - that's wrong because they're nice, old vehicles which hark back to a bygone time.
I happen to think if you post on here criticising an operator for running old vehicles and a poor service, you can't really then, a few posts down, criticise them for withdrawing their oldest vehicles.......
why are you so bothered about this?
its a forum, its a discussion, I contradicted myself, so what?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I do sometimes feel operators are damned if they do and damned if they don't on these boards.
Any vehicles which First inherited from Northampton Corporation will easily be the oldest on the fleet (despite First's better efforts at the moment), so surely replacing them with something newer should be welcomed?
I'm no fan of First or how they operate in Northampton, but given you've complained regularly about the age of First's vehicles, to criticise them for replacing some of the very oldest vehicles with something newer (albeit with some decidedly second hand vehicles no doubt) just for some emotive reason, does seem a bit silly.
actually, reading your reply to this as well... you seem to have it in for the bus enthusiasts, actually, we're damned if we say anything :roll: