317 forever
Established Member
Are they still 'Transforming Travel'......
First spent a few years transforming travel. Now TfL have announced they are transforming Oxford Street. I'll leave it to you to draw any parellels you like!
Are they still 'Transforming Travel'......
First spent a few years transforming travel. Now TfL have announced they are transforming Oxford Street. I'll leave it to you to draw any parellels you like!
Really noticeable how good First were at communicating how services were running over the last few days. Most opcos were doing a great job on Twitter. Which leads to the obvious question: why so bad at updating on services the rest of the time? They seem to view Twitter as a promotional tool rather than providing updates - no doubt a centralising cost-cutting measure – but other operators (as usual, I’m thinking of Lothian, but other companies do exist!) and some of the rail companies have shown how to provide excellent real-time info AND build their brand at the same time.
First Kernow have been doing an excellent job, and also use Twitter routinely to advise of disruption. It's managed locally, which makes a difference.Really noticeable how good First were at communicating how services were running over the last few days. Most opcos were doing a great job on Twitter. Which leads to the obvious question: why so bad at updating on services the rest of the time? They seem to view Twitter as a promotional tool rather than providing updates - no doubt a centralising cost-cutting measure – but other operators (as usual, I’m thinking of Lothian, but other companies do exist!) and some of the rail companies have shown how to provide excellent real-time info AND build their brand at the same time.
First Bluebird and First Aberdeen have the same Twitter staff and do provide updates and reply back to passengers.
Really noticeable how good First were at communicating how services were running over the last few days. Most opcos were doing a great job on Twitter. Which leads to the obvious question: why so bad at updating on services the rest of the time? They seem to view Twitter as a promotional tool rather than providing updates - no doubt a centralising cost-cutting measure – but other operators (as usual, I’m thinking of Lothian, but other companies do exist!) and some of the rail companies have shown how to provide excellent real-time info AND build their brand at the same time.
What about the three quarters of the UK population (as of 2017) who are not on Twitter? How do First communicate to them? First Manchester's obsession with Twitter nearly caused a riot at Shudehill Interchange last January when the curtailed all cross-city services one afternoon, just after they had given 90 days notice to all on-street Inspectorate.
OK - so how do you communicate with the 9% of people who have never used the internet? Especially on a day when actually getting around is pretty difficult.
Are we expecting hordes of people with sandwich boards to walk around with information? Twitter, facebook, web isn't perfect but it's better than before. I can use my smartphone now to understand where my bus is (or if it's not running) in most instances whereas go back 20 years ago, I'd have been stood like a lemon (and I was on occasion)!
There is a distinct difference between communicating with 21% of the population and (using your figures) 91% of the population. There is no obvious solution, other than not making human beings redundant to satisfy the shareholders who will then whinge at paying axes to support the jobless, but Twitter seems to be taking over the world of communication. I don't even now what it is, other than seeing it on media websites where it just quotes verbatim what the original story (or e-mail) said.
And whilst I accept that the recent weather caused major problems for many public transport users, and was out of the control of Transport providers, the corollory is that for most bus users up and down the country, the more general need to communicate was much less 20, or certainly 32 years ago, because punctualiity was better and headways were higher, so you would be much less likely to be "stood around like a lemon" in the first place.
I thought you said two thirds of the population - how does that equate to 21%? Actually, the ONS put the figure at 45.9% on twitter. I'm nearer the grave than the cradle but I use twitter and tracking apps to understand where my bus is. We can complain about excluding people who don't wish to do this or that, but time moves on. We might as well complain about not being able to go out and buy a nice typewriter!
As regards your comments on headways, that wasn't the case where I lived and being stuck in a miserable Bishop Auckland bus station because a knackered Leyland National had expired somewhere in Co Durham was not much fun! Now, I can just say "stuff it" and head off for a coffee/pint
It’s like when fares go up, and loads of people rant on Twitter that they didn’t know and nobody told them.
This despite the fact the news was mentioned on Twitter many times per day for weeks, was on the website and was on posters on board the bus.
They can’t win, unless they sent personal letters to all customers.
Maybe that says it all about those that ARE on Twitter. Posters on buses remain the most obvious and sensible way of communicating. Websites would be ok IF they are kept up to date AND they identify with the area you request.
What about the three quarters of the UK population (as of 2017) who are not on Twitter? How do First communicate to them?
There is a distinct difference between communicating with 21% of the population and (using your figures) 91% of the population. There is no obvious solution, other than not making human beings redundant to satisfy the shareholders who will then whinge at paying axes to support the jobless, but Twitter seems to be taking over the world of communication. I don't even now what it is, other than seeing it on media websites where it just quotes verbatim what the original story (or e-mail) said
for most bus users up and down the country, the more general need to communicate was much less 20, or certainly 32 years ago, because punctualiity was better and headways were higher, so you would be much less likely to be "stood around like a lemon" in the first place.
Maybe that says it all about those that ARE on Twitter. Posters on buses remain the most obvious and sensible way of communicating. Websites would be ok IF they are kept up to date AND they identify with the area you request.
No I said three quarters. The actual figure quoted by "Omnicore" was 13 million in the UK as of early 2017. I'm sure the total population of the UK is approaching £65 million. I also (sometimes) use tracking apps for both Stagecoach Manchester and my local rail route. However, neither are brilliant, albeit Stagecoach have improved recently. And, as discussed elsewhere - what about reception? Wi-fi on Stagecoach buses is very hit and miss, and t'internet superhighway can be just as slow (or gridlocked) as the M60. Its been very poor tonight for instance and after an earlier failure, I have had to log on to most of my forums (including this one) again from scratch.
Like I said, I don't even know what Twitter is. Does it cost money? Is it secure? Will I be inundated by unwanted adverts? At least I tried facebook once - when it finally accepted me, it sent me a page of mugshots that wouldn't have gone amiss on Police Five - so I tried to quit straight away. 18 months later, I stopped getting prompts from them!!!
However, that is the truth of traditional media. Were I to travel a few miles from my house, there's a bus route with timetable cases containing info that is 2.5 years ago out of date. The previous operator withdrew the commercial service (and can't blame them), council tendered a replacement but haven't bothered to update the timetables and neither has the new operator.
Arguably, it is far easier to change a website than to update x number of posters etc.
You have a lot of opinions about how bad Twitter is, considering that you admit that you don't even know what it is?
Thirty two years ago, mileage may have been higher but headways were generally a lot poorer on each route - you might have had a dozen buses an hour on a corridor but not one simple five minute frequency, it'd often have been a miso-mash of twenty and thirty minute frequencies.
Modern networks are generally a lot simpler with good headways, Overground-style routes etc - maybe fewer buses but not the muddle of infrequent services with prefixes and suffixes.
Posters on buses really aren't much use for keeping up to date during inclement weather, given how often things may have changed during the worst of the day too - some routes in Sheffield were changing several times a day last week, as the snow fell/melted and traffic disruptions evolved.
All fair comments, but I remember when buses were cancelled (a frequent occurrence) forty years ago there were sandwich boards (with chalk) listing the cancellations at the appropriate town centre bus stops. With all the advances in modern technology it's something that neither the apps nor twitter and facebook (nor the electronic boards and traveline) manage though!
I know it's not the bus companies' "fault". The IT sector doesn't "do" customer service, anywhere! (A computer program can never be wrong by definition, we just have to create a perfect world to go with it!) It's the problem everywhere!
I wouldn't have thought that sandwich boards located at just town centre stops would have been much use to passengers coming in to the town centre, or departing from anywhere other than the central stops !. Just goes to show that it was little real help even then.
At least the internet, Apps and Facebook/Twitter allow users a choice of communication channels to use if and when they wish - anywhere and at any time.
True. The point though was that at least someone made the effort and the sandwich boards did give useful, usually accurate and concise information from the people "in the know", the supervisors on the ground,. I accept the problem today is there is no-one to make the effort, and when there is they often haven't much clue how to or even, access to the information.I wouldn't have thought that sandwich boards located at just town centre stops would have been much use to passengers coming in to the town centre, or departing from anywhere other than the central stops !. Just goes to show that it was little real help even then.
At least the internet, Apps and Facebook/Twitter allow users a choice of communication channels to use if and when they wish - anywhere and at any time.
True. The point though was that at least someone made the effort and the sandwich boards did give useful, usually accurate and concise information from the people "in the know", the supervisors on the ground,. I accept the problem today is there is no-one to make the effort, and when there is they often haven't much clue how to or even, access to the information.
As I believe in all the Shires the Councils prohibit the bus companies from tampering with their physical timetable boards - as the OCs never tire of telling us - though I gather they are the Council's contractor for maintaining them - and apparently it didn't stop them on a least one weekend from putting diversion notices up (though perhaps as drivers often seem to use the wrong route it probably made little difference!) I know "the contract says . . . " but that seems to be more honoured in the breach, usually . . .
With the recent fare increase we were told that the twitter/PR team sent on-bus notices to all the depots and instructed them to be put on all buses, but some depots did, and some didn't at all, and some did on some buses but not on others. I suppose as they say in other parts of the country, there's nowt so queer as folk! Nor, it seems, such variety as at First Bus. Their diversity policy, perhaps they didn't hear the equality bit before the "and"?
Pre-Internet the only way to get information out beyond the bus station / town centre would have been by phone (either a recorded message or someone actually in the office answering it; both of which would have had very limited capacity) or via local radio (hoping they'd read out your info and passengers would be listening).
I don't know about the other First companies, but First Kernow's tweets are linked to their Facebook page and also appear on the website. Not sure what else they can do.There is a distinct difference between communicating with 21% of the population and (using your figures) 91% of the population. There is no obvious solution, other than not making human beings redundant to satisfy the shareholders who will then whinge at paying axes to support the jobless, but Twitter seems to be taking over the world of communication. I don't even now what it is, other than seeing it on media websites where it just quotes verbatim what the original story (or e-mail) said.
And whilst I accept that the recent weather caused major problems for many public transport users, and was out of the control of Transport providers, the corollory is that for most bus users up and down the country, the more general need to communicate was much less 20, or certainly 32 years ago, because punctualiity was better and headways were higher, so you would be much less likely to be "stood around like a lemon" in the first place.
I don't know about the other First companies, but First Kernow's tweets are linked to their Facebook page and also appear on the website. Not sure what else they can do.
Stagecoach West generally the travel shops are down stairs and management upstairs same as in Bedford,Basingstoke Andover .In Wales the management are mostly based at the depot most which are not near town except Cwmbran and Brynmawr .Ah, but is it a substitute for a person writing on a blackboard in a bus station? In fairness, FK are one of the better exponents of social media etc.
One of my friends was one of two people responsible for updating FB/Twitter/web for another bus groups' (i.e. not First) Opcos. That was in addition to their regular duties, and was before live tracking was commonplace. It is very blase to criticise all bus companies but even with dedicated people, it is very challenging to keep up to speed.
It is an imperfect world. Ideally, bus companies would be able to have legions of people to walk round with blackboards but is that really the most effective way of quickly disseminating information? Posters and leaflets by all means but social media is a massively helpful tool.
There are better examples of the use of social media (like First Kernow) and perhaps that "best practice" should be adopted as the industry standard? However, were things better in the past? No, they weren't, and complaining about the use of twitter (and other stuff like e-tickets) is like bemoaning the loss of the quill and the florin.
NOTE: I mention travelshops. These were once a staple of many bus operators in many towns but now no more. Their justification was often supported by the ability to generate revenue from selling coach tickets and holidays - a source of revenue now broadly lost to the internet! Even here, there are variations - Stagecoach West have travelshops in their main towns whereas Stagecoach Wales (next door) have closed all theirs and some years ago.