• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

F1 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
On sky they played the team radio, the conversation told him to not challenge alonso unless its a straight forward pass as they were happy with 18 points. Skys commentator then said he wondered if that classed as a team order to not upset the engine provider.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bungle73

On Moderation
Joined
19 Aug 2011
Messages
3,216
Location
Kent
On sky they played the team radio, the conversation told him to not challenge alonso unless its a straight forward pass as they were happy with 18 points. Skys commentator then said he wondered if that classed as a team order to not upset the engine provider.

I know, I watched it; but he still made the error and after that any chance was of a move was gone.
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,777
Location
South London
On sky they played the team radio, the conversation told him to not challenge alonso unless its a straight forward pass as they were happy with 18 points. Skys commentator then said he wondered if that classed as a team order to not upset the engine provider.

I infer that as "don't take unnecessary risks and bin it into the wall, second is fantastic now bring it home".
 

andrew bell

Member
Joined
24 Aug 2011
Messages
437
Location
Great Yarmouth
Does anyone agree with me about what Christian Horner and Seb Vettel said about passing the HRT was pure sour grapes as it was Vettel's mistake and none of them are man enough to admit their mistake and try and blame someone else. A similar incident was last year between Lewis Hamilton and Kobayshi in Belguim, only Lewis spun out and retired and when he was asked afterwards about it he said I misjudged it, my mistake and if there is any penalty I will accept it
 

gswindale

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2010
Messages
1,021
Didn't seem to be much difference between the Button/Kartikhayan and Vettel/Kartikhayan incidents to me apart from one was for position & the other was to lap him.

Given the track conditions, could Vettel have not passed on a straight rather than into a corner?
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
Vettel passed on the exit of a corner tbf, but gave little room to the HRT and in the wet, where aquaplaning is common, it is asking for trouble. Coulthard actually called it right (for once) imo, a racing incident.

I thought at first Vettel had moved as much as Karthikeyan, but actually the track curves to the left (as the driver sees it) so it was deceptive.

Button was gentleman enough to admit he made a mistake against the HRT, locking up his brakes and sliding into Karthikeyan, although I think he was unlucky to lose his wing.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
Didn't seem to be much difference between the Button/Kartikhayan and Vettel/Kartikhayan incidents to me apart from one was for position & the other was to lap him.

Given the track conditions, could Vettel have not passed on a straight rather than into a corner?

They both made awkward moves, looks like both drivers got impatient. That's an old problem, and it seems they both paid the price.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Why have Sauber gone into partnership with Chelsea...?

I'm sure the Barcelona crowd are loving that <(
 
Last edited:

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
Why have Sauber gone into partnership with Chelsea...?

I'm sure the Barcelona crowd are loving that <(

£££ :D

Incidentally, did McLaren underestimate fuel quantities, or was it something else?
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
If they did underestimate the fuel, that's a pretty amateur mistake!

I would expect it to be something else to be honest.
 

NIMBUS

Member
Joined
13 May 2011
Messages
176
Lewis has been stripped of pole and will start from the back of the grid. The stewards found against McLaren for the rule infringement over fuel.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
This seems quite harsh. I think something like a 10-place demotion would have been fairer.

All the best for Maldonado for tomorrow from the pole!

If they did underestimate the fuel, that's a pretty amateur mistake!

Amateurs :roll:
 

gswindale

Member
Joined
1 Jun 2010
Messages
1,021
It seems that McLaren are doing all they can to throw away this year's championship!

The car clearly has the pace, but the strategy guys don't seem to be fully "with it".

Have they recently employed somebody from another top team...
 

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
Senna ran out of fuel in two consecutive races in 1991.
 
Last edited:

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
Article 6.6.2 of the technical regulations:

Competitors must ensure that a one litre sample of fuel may be taken from the car at any time during the Event.
Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the stewards of the meeting), if a sample of fuel is required after a practice session the car concerned must have first been driven back to the pits under its own power.

However this was not a practice session, oh wait, it was Hamilton....
 

Bungle73

On Moderation
Joined
19 Aug 2011
Messages
3,216
Location
Kent
Article 6.6.2 of the technical regulations:

Competitors must ensure that a one litre sample of fuel may be taken from the car at any time during the Event.
Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the stewards of the meeting), if a sample of fuel is required after a practice session the car concerned must have first been driven back to the pits under its own power.

However this was not a practice session, oh wait, it was Hamilton....

It applies to qualifying too. The rule was changed a few years ago when exactly the same thing happened: Lewis stopped out on the track having qualified so he'd have enough fuel for a sample. In that case it was legal; then they changed the rules.

I don't get why he's been put at the back though. They were saying before this was announced the most likely punishment would stripping him of his fastest time, which should have put him in sixth.
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
EDITED: Ah, so they use "Practice sessions" to cover "free Practice" and "Qualifying Practice".

EDIT 2: Given that Kobayashi didn't make it to the pits after his last run either, surely he has to have a penalty?
 
Last edited:

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,805
Location
Epsom
In the case of Hamilton, apparently ( according to the BBC anyway! ) the guy who was putting the fuel in had the rig switch set on remove at first; corrected it but then they decided not to keep the rig on for the 3 or 4 seconds it would have taken to get the correct volume of fuel in...!!

I suppose at least it makes a change from cross threaded wheel nuts.....:roll:
 

craigwilson

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2010
Messages
424
Location
Buxton, Derbyshire
EDITED: Ah, so they use "Practice sessions" to cover "free Practice" and "Qualifying Practice".

EDIT 2: Given that Kobayashi didn't make it to the pits after his last run either, surely he has to have a penalty?

Didn't Kamui stop in the middle of a fast lap? Probably unlikely he ran out of fuel in this case.
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
There isn't a rule specific to running out of fuel. The rule says that if a specimen of fuel is required the car must make it back to the pits under it's own power.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,129
Location
Redcar
Tis a shame, I am not sure how easy it is to make a mistake with the fill or remove switch, but it shouldnt happen in Q3 of a World Championship round.

That said, Q3 today was one of the best I have seen, even if it did look a possible damp squib in the early minutes. It has made for a potentially cracking race tomorrow though with Hamilton, Webber and Button all up for an overtake.

Race of the year perhaps, like Canada last year? (But dry)
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster
There isn't a rule specific to running out of fuel. The rule says that if a specimen of fuel is required the car must make it back to the pits under it's own power.

AFAIK, all cars that make it into Q3 must provide a fuel sample, although I'm open to being corrected about that.
 

hairyhandedfool

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2008
Messages
8,837
AFAIK, all cars that make it into Q3 must provide a fuel sample, although I'm open to being corrected about that.

Yes, but craigwilson said that it is unlikely Kamui ran out off fuel, that is what I was refering to, not the need for a fuel sample.

Tis a shame, I am not sure how easy it is to make a mistake with the fill or remove switch, but it shouldnt happen in Q3 of a World Championship round.

That said, Q3 today was one of the best I have seen, even if it did look a possible damp squib in the early minutes. It has made for a potentially cracking race tomorrow though with Hamilton, Webber and Button all up for an overtake.

Race of the year perhaps, like Canada last year? (But dry)

Barcalona is not known for it's overtaking though, so it'll be tough even from the midfield, the start will be crutial.
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Article 6.6.2 of the technical regulations:

Competitors must ensure that a one litre sample of fuel may be taken from the car at any time during the Event.
Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the stewards of the meeting), if a sample of fuel is required after a practice session the car concerned must have first been driven back to the pits under its own power.

However this was not a practice session, oh wait, it was Hamilton....

McLaren did it a couple of years ago, by not giving Hamilton fuel for the return to the pits they gained about 2 tenths of a second for a £50,000 fine. Needless to say that the FIA were not amused hence why they have come down hard on this occasion
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top