What a waste of time the last 9 months have been.
It has the potential to hurt middle incomers more than the minimum wagers. I don't accept Brexit will do either
For me the sovereignty point is worth any penalties accrued.
Remind me again, what nationality is Mrs Farage?
And I (and many experts in politics and economics) disagree with you.
There is the very real risk of companies packing up and leaving some of these areas where they are potentially one of the major employers. So try telling a Brexit voter who has just lost his job because the company moved away because of Brexit that all is ok!
And there we have it. Brexit at any cost.
And yet he was the same person trying to blame literally everything (including being late to a meeting in Wales because of M4 traffic) on immigration so you'd have initially thought he would be the one playing hardball with the lives of EU citizens living in this country.
It may, if you had no other aspirations. It probably wouldn't fulfil the Thatcherite right to own ones own home, neither would it provide children with the new football boots, piano lessons and private tuition the middle classes enjoy.Would you agree then that packing frozen food on a night shift ( as you quoted earlier ) would actually meet the minimum requirements of putting a roof over your head?
If the EU is the predatory, expansionist, political and economic monopoly some fear, then some cost is inevitable. Just as it was in 1940 when Britain could have sued for peace and saved numerous British lives at the price of vassal statehood.And there we have it. Brexit at any cost.
It may, if you had no other aspirations. It probably wouldn't fulfil the Thatcherite right to own ones own home, neither would it provide children with the new football boots, piano lessons and private tuition the middle classes enjoy.
If the EU is the predatory, expansionist, political and economic monopoly some fear, then some cost is inevitable. Just as it was in 1940 when Britain could have sued for peace and saved numerous British lives at the price of vassal statehood.
Economic "experts" differ over the cost of UK independence, so "any price" is rhetoric at this stage.
I thought that they'd separated?
In truth it would depend on the amount of profit the company owner is prepared to share with his workforce, in other words the wages he was prepared to pay. Even in the horrors of Victorian industrial exploitation some mill owners were driven by philanthropic principles to provide libraries, schools, good housing and leisure facilities for their employees, when they could have worked them to death like the rest.I m sure you would agree that the state should not provide football boots, piano lessons and private tuition to anyone......that would really be dependent on the frozen food packer.
Depopulate the areas of Britain where such practices still pay, head for London and buy a slave hutch in Milton Keynes like every other drone.In reality, absolutely anyone has the right to own their own home. What would you suggest that the frozen food packer does if they indeed wanted to do that assuming they dont already ?
In truth it would depend on the amount of profit the company owner is prepared to share with his workforce, in other words the wages he was prepared to pay. Even in the horrors of Victorian industrial exploitation some mill owners were driven by philanthropic principles to provide libraries, schools, good housing and leisure facilities for their employees, when they could have worked them to death like the rest.
Depopulate the areas of Britain where such practices still pay, head for London and buy a slave hutch in Milton Keynes like every other drone.
Anyway, we are where we are, no doubt the Brexit news will fade for the time being whilst 2 years of negotiations are under way. You would have to wonder however what will happen in other Euro countries when elections come up and eurosceptic parties possibly get voted in. UK has jumped ship rightly or wrongly.......just how many will follow ?
In reality, absolutely anyone has the right to own their own home.
Every one of your posts has been a question, and each of mine has been as answer. Let's switch it, do you believe in the principle of from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs?Do you think Bill Gates has philanthropic principles ??
No, they don't have a right.
Perhaps you mean "people should have the opportunity to own"?
Every one of your posts has been a question, and each of mine has been as answer. Let's switch it, do you believe in the principle of from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs?
It may, if you had no other aspirations. It probably wouldn't fulfil the Thatcherite right to own ones own home, neither would it provide children with the new football boots, piano lessons and private tuition the middle classes enjoy.
People should have the right to a roof over their head, though. And a proper roof, looked after and everything, free from the threat of being evicted by a rogue landlord because they "smell of curry" or are a plumber.
However thanks to the weakest security of tenure laws in Europe, a tenant can be booted out with two months' notice, and then they're in the jaws of letting agent filth who'll charge a £400 "administration fee" for doing diddly squat.
The only way you get secure tenure in this country is through buying. That's really where people like Moonshot are coming from. You should be able to put down roots.
Every one of your posts has been a question, and each of mine has been as answer. Let's switch it, do you believe in the principle of from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs?
People should have the right to a roof over their head, though. And a proper roof, looked after and everything, free from the threat of being evicted by a rogue landlord because they "smell of curry" or are a plumber.
However thanks to the weakest security of tenure laws in Europe, a tenant can be booted out with two months' notice, and then they're in the jaws of letting agent filth who'll charge a £400 "administration fee" for doing diddly squat.
The only way you get secure tenure in this country is through buying. That's really where people like Moonshot are coming from. You should be able to put down roots.
So you don't believe it incumbent upon those who through social background or innate intelligence have made pots of money to share it with those lacking such in such gifts? You're a social Darwinian who believes the last dog standing wins and it's governments role to ease their path in every way possible?I believe that everyone should maximise their own abilities....I accept the fact that some have more ability than others. Government should put as few hurdles in the way as possible.
So you don't believe it incumbent upon those who through social background or innate intelligence have made pots of money to share it with those lacking such in such gifts? You're a social Darwinian who believes the last dog standing wins and it's governments role to ease their path in every way possible?
There is no £350M per week. There never was, it was a creative use of statistics by the Leave campaign.Isnt that what our own government is doing by withdrawing from the EU thus saving £350 million per week...
I don't think the Bill Gates model is a reliable means of wealth distribution. Nor are Google, Amazon or Starbucks exemplars of the dictum I quoted above.Isnt that what Bill Gates does with his foundation??
Telling someone in Boston or Stoke on Trent they'd never had it so good, , which was the nub of the Remain argument
I'm aware of the Harold Macmillan speech, and the Remain mind set was the same - quit moaning and stop rocking the boat, you've all got loadsamoney! (Unless you haven't in which case you're too lazy to pick spuds).I think you are 60 years out of date in your reasoning, as it was in 1957 that the then British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan, made the speech with those same sentiments,
I don't think the Bill Gates model is a reliable means of wealth distribution. Nor are Google, Amazon or Starbucks exemplars of the dictum I quoted above.
There is no £350M per week. There never was, it was a creative use of statistics by the Leave campaign.
I can't believe that people still take that as fact.
Are you aware of criticisms of their tax avoidance? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20560359Really ?? remind me again of how many people in the UK are employed by those 3 mentioned above?