• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Emt upfn

Status
Not open for further replies.

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
Hi,

I've received a UPFN from EMT for using a combination of tickets which I believe are perfectly valid on the train I was travelling on.

Some questions if I could have your expertise:

  • Can they withdraw it and pursue legal action within the 21 days I have to pay it?
  • Should I wait for correspondence in the post, or proactively write to them regarding it?
  • Who should I write to, the 'independent' company on the UPFN, or EMT directly?

Thanks!

Update (by yorkie): The UFN was cancelled in the end, as EMT reluctantly admitted it was valid
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

156441

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2011
Messages
501
Location
Manchester
The first question going to be asked I assume would be your route and combo of tickets.

From there others can assist accordingly!
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
Ignore it and end up in court!

If the combination is valid then it is better to deal with it now, try and be a smart a#se and it will end in tears.
 

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
I've had reassurance from RJ and soil that the combo is valid, so I don't want to reveal it on here unless necessary.

Two interesting points are that two separate ticket offices issued me with seat reservations for the through trains both out and return based on the combination of tickets shown; and after the UPFN on the outbound journey, the EMT ticket office at the destination issued me with an 'Authority to travel' slip to ensure I wouldn't have any problems on the return journey!
 

156441

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2011
Messages
501
Location
Manchester
If you have already sought info from two other forum members and you believe that their information is true why are you continuing on the forum to question what to do next?

As you have involved RJ I take it your ticket choice was dodgy at best and that's the reason you don't want to put it on here!!

Did you have your tickets withdrawn?
If not I would copy them and write to both EMT and the company on the UPFN!
 

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
If you have already sought info from two other forum members and you believe that their information is true why are you continuing on the forum to question what to do next?

As you have involved RJ I take it your ticket choice was dodgy at best and that's the reason you don't want to put it on here!!

Did you have your tickets withdrawn?
If not I would copy them and write to both EMT and the company on the UPFN!

Thanks for your response.

I never said the ticket choice was dodgy, but I have heard that some of the more obscure and beneficial loopholes are at risk of being closed off if they are made common knowledge. My understanding is that it's not dodgy, it's either valid or it's not?

In my post I wasn't asking for help with the validity of the ticket, my questions are this:

  • Can they withdraw it and pursue legal action within the 21 days I have to pay it?
  • Should I wait for correspondence in the post, or proactively write to them regarding it?
  • Who should I write to, the 'independent' company on the UPFN, or EMT directly?

I haven't asked these yet in PMs so I thought I'd ask them on the forum....
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,451
I am in PM conversation with the OP and can confirm that the tickets are valid. The permitted routes are obscure, but they are definitely valid.

Can I request that members refrain from the word "dodgy" as that is certainly what the combination the OP used is not.
 

MikeWh

Established Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
15 Jun 2010
Messages
8,549
Location
Crayford
  • Can they withdraw it and pursue legal action within the 21 days I have to pay it?
  • Should I wait for correspondence in the post, or proactively write to them regarding it?
  • Who should I write to, the 'independent' company on the UPFN, or EMT directly?

1) They can withdraw it, although that is something that usually only happens while talking to you if they suspect more trouble (ie you give a false address).
2) Proactively write to them. They are expecting payment in 21 days and will move you to the next stage if they get nothing.
3) Both. The independent company will probably dismiss it, but they need to see what's happening. EMT will hopefully quash it, especially if they get wind that RJ is involved.
 

LexyBoy

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
4,478
Location
North of the rivers
As Mike said.

They can withdraw it and take legal action, as you have travelled without paying the fare due and/or attempted to avoid paying the correct fare (in EMT's eyes).

Write to EMT, copying the independent company (IRCAS presumably) with an explanation of why the tickets you held were valid, and stating that you have no intention of paying the UPFN and expect it to be cancelled with immediate effect.

I'd love to see the mass facepalming going on in EMT HQ when they realise a horde of RJlets has been unleashed <D
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,451
I'd love to see the mass facepalming going on in EMT HQ when they realise a horde of RJlets has been unleashed <D

Wishful thinking. :p

To do what RJ does takes up an enormous amount of time and effort. There is an endlessly long line of potential confrontations waiting to happen, and requires diligent research work. The passenger has to tread very carefully as one wrong step and EMT will probably take him to the cleaners.

Time is money to many people. Unless there is a massive saving to be made the majority I can say will not be willing to deal with the potential consequences, including hassle and stress. I don't think many on here have the time or the energy to be involved in a never-ending circle of appealing UPFNs and Penalty Fares, realistically speaking.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
I'd love to see the mass facepalming going on in EMT HQ when they realise a horde of RJlets has been unleashed <D

To be clear I proposed these tickets to the OP, rj is not training an army. :lol::lol:

I would add, that given the actions of the EMT office at Leicester (?), in issuing the authority to travel, that this is pretty dreadful treatment of customers by the guard on the outbound train, as EMT staff were evidently able to satisfy themselves that the tickets were valid, so the fact that the ticket office felt it necessary to issue the authority for the return leg speaks volumes about the cavalier attitude that EMT on-board staff have towards the rules of the railways.

I trust that an appropriate letter is being drafted to this effect.
 
Last edited:

GadgetMan

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2012
Messages
980
Hi,

I've received a UPFN from EMT for using a combination of tickets which I believe are perfectly valid on the train I was travelling on.

Some questions if I could have your expertise:

  • Can they withdraw it and pursue legal action within the 21 days I have to pay it?
  • Should I wait for correspondence in the post, or proactively write to them regarding it?
  • Who should I write to, the 'independent' company on the UPFN, or EMT directly?

Thanks!


Out of curiosity how do you end up agreeing to accepting a UPFN. UPFNs are for when the passenger accepts they don't hold a valid ticket and agree to pay the outstanding fare within 21 or less days. With disputed routes the TIR process should be used with tickets being confiscated, passenger details taken and zero fare ticket issued.

Do the guards mention what they would do if you refused to accept a UPFN?
 

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
1) They can withdraw it, although that is something that usually only happens while talking to you if they suspect more trouble (ie you give a false address).
2) Proactively write to them. They are expecting payment in 21 days and will move you to the next stage if they get nothing.
3) Both. The independent company will probably dismiss it, but they need to see what's happening. EMT will hopefully quash it, especially if they get wind that RJ is involved.

Great - thanks for this.

Point 1 was mainly around if they withdraw it and escalate it to legal action my risk if I'm wrong is much higher. Right now my worst-case is just to pay it and try and claim it back.

I am drafting a letter now which I will send to them over the weekend, I will send it to both companies.

What sort of tone should I take with them? Obviously I will keep it factual and polite, but do I:

  • Inform them that the UPFN was issued erroneously and is not valid, based on attached ticket combination?
  • Explain how the tickets are valid, or let them tell me why it's not?
  • Ask them why I was issued a UPFN, I can't imagine the TM took down the ticket I had, how can they write a UPFN without specifying the real tickets held by the customer?
  • Copy the relevant routing points and map from the NRG and attach it to 'show my working', or leave that bit up to them?
  • Request/require any written confirmation that is is valid rather than them just dropping the UPFN without admission?
  • Ask very nicely that they drop the UPFN rather than stating the fact
  • 'Offer' to resolve it amicably now to save 'further costs' arising?

Not to say I'm going to go in all guns blazing but I want some advice on what these sort of people respond to and what is likely to get me the right outcome.

Thanks!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Out of curiosity how do you end up agreeing to accepting a UPFN. UPFNs are for when the passenger accepts they don't hold a valid ticket and agree to pay the outstanding fare within 21 or less days. With disputed routes the TIR process should be used with tickets being confiscated, passenger details taken and zero fare ticket issued.

Do the guards mention what they would do if you refused to accept a UPFN?

I presented my tickets and after long drawn out conversation he asked for my name and address which I gave him. Effectively this is the limit of my involvement, he chose to issue me a UPFN bit of paper but I did not accept it, sign it or give my date of birth etc. If a TIR is appropriate maybe I should have asked for one?
 
Last edited:

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,451
If a TIR is appropriate maybe I should have asked for one?

No, no, absolutely not.

You have done well in the circumstances described and tried your best. If you explicitly ask for a TIR, it might give the guard the wrong impression, potentially causing more unnecessary hassle for you.

If the guard decides to issue a UPFN, let him. As long as he does not leave you stranded, the eventual outcome should not be much different whichever is issued.
 

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
No, no, absolutely not.

You have done well in the circumstances described and tried your best. If you explicitly ask for a TIR, it might give the guard the wrong impression, potentially causing more unnecessary hassle for you.

If the guard decides to issue a UPFN, let him. As long as he does not leave you stranded, the eventual outcome should not be much different whichever is issued.

He at first said that 'as I have no ticket, I have to buy a new one' - I said that (politely) he's entitled to his opinion but I wasn't going to buy a new ticket as I believed mine were valid. After several bits of back and forth he asked me to write my name address and DoB on a slip of blank paper (I wrote my name and address), and he came back with the UPFN form.

He said I was being "very obstructive" by not providing my DoB or signing the form, I told him I would happily do so if I was legally obliged to provide them but he couldn't prove that I had to. The back of the UPFN just says name and address too :)
 

embers25

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2009
Messages
2,159
Where did you get the idea that it's only a few quid?

It's definitely thousands not a few quid and quite frankly good on him. The actual issue isn't that RJ is saving money, which is very smart, its that he should never have needed to go the lengths he has had to go with EMT. It's one thing to not understand the rules once, twice or even 10 times but month after month and the same guard over and over is woeful customer service. I agree with the poster that commented on being careful as you do need to be on very safe ground but for those of us that regularly experience EMT guards out of St Pancras their complete lack of ticket knowledge, for even basic tickets is astounding! For example I've had issues using Woking to Luton tickets on trains that stop at Luton Airport as apparently I should use a direct train and also I really should be using First Capital Connect as they are a long distance train.
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
Great - thanks for this.

Point 1 was mainly around if they withdraw it and escalate it to legal action my risk if I'm wrong is much higher. Right now my worst-case is just to pay it and try and claim it back.

I am drafting a letter now which I will send to them over the weekend, I will send it to both companies.

What sort of tone should I take with them? Obviously I will keep it factual and polite, but do I:

  • Inform them that the UPFN was issued erroneously and is not valid, based on attached ticket combination?
  • Explain how the tickets are valid, or let them tell me why it's not?
  • Ask them why I was issued a UPFN, I can't imagine the TM took down the ticket I had, how can they write a UPFN without specifying the real tickets held by the customer?
  • Copy the relevant routing points and map from the NRG and attach it to 'show my working', or leave that bit up to them?
  • Request/require any written confirmation that is is valid rather than them just dropping the UPFN without admission?
  • Ask very nicely that they drop the UPFN rather than stating the fact
  • 'Offer' to resolve it amicably now to save 'further costs' arising?


I would say something like:

To whom It May Concern,

On (date) I travelled on the (traintime) from St Pancras to Leicester.

I held the following tickets, which were valid for the complete journey under the terms of the National Rail Conditions of Carriage:

* London Travelcard Zones 1-6 Weekly Season ticket, held on an Oyster Card
* An Anytime Day Return (or whatever) from A to B Route Z (as applicable)
* An Anytime Day Return (or whatever) from C to D Route Y (as applicable)
* An Anytime Day Return (or whatever) from E to F Route X (as applicable)

I had purchased these tickets at <station> on <date>. I explained to the station staff that these tickets were valid on the <traintime> from St Pancras to Leicester under the National Rail Conditions of Carriage and the rules provided in the National Routeing Guide, and I was issued with a reservation for the <traintime> service.

On board the train a member of East Midlands Trains staff, a <Mr. Jones> claimed that my tickets were not valid and that I would have to buy a new ticket for £77.

I informed him that my tickets were valid, and attempted to show <Mr. Jones> a copy of the National Rail Conditions of Carriage and the National Routeing Guide, which demonstrated this.

<Mr. Jones> refused to read any of my supporting documentation, and said that he had been doing the job for 22 years and had therefore no need to read any rules.

Having refused to read my documents, <Mr. Jones> told me that I needed to purchase a new ticket. As I held a valid combination of tickets in accordance with the National Rail Conditions of Carriage Condition 19, I declined to do so.

He then proceeded to issue an 'Unpaid Fares Notice', which i declined to sign as I held a combination of tickets that was valid for my journey.

The guard claimed that my tickets were not valid for the following reasons:

* Oyster Cards are not valid on East Midlands Trains services, as per signage at St Pancras station.

Reply: Any such signage is misleading and should be removed. An Oyster Card is a form of electronic ticket in accordance with the National Rail Conditions of Carriage and the supplemental Oyster Conditions of Use on National Rail Services. In particular, in the latter document at 1.3 note: 'All Train Companies operating services into the London Fare Zones Area accept valid Travelcards issued on Oyster'.

A valid travelcard is a valid travelcard, whether it is issued on paper or as an Oyster card, and travelcards are valid on all East Midlands Services, when used in a valid combination of tickets in accordance with the National Rail Conditions of Carriage Condition 19.

* the train did not stop at the points where my tickets switched from one ticket to another

Reply: The National Rail Conditions of Carriage at 19(c) provide:

"You may use two or more tickets for one journey as long as together they cover the entire journey and one of the following applies:
(a) they are both Zonal Tickets unless special conditions prohibit their use in this way. The Ticket Seller will, if you ask, advise you whether you can use a Zonal Ticket in combination with another ticket.
(b) the train you are in calls at a station where you change from one ticket to another;
OR
(c) one of the tickets is a Season Ticket (which for this purpose does not include Season Tickets or travel passes issued on behalf of a passenger transport executive or local authority) or a leisure travel pass, and the other ticket(s) is/are not. "

In this case 19(c) applies - there is no requirement for the train to call at the station where the ticket changes from one to another, because one of the tickets was a season ticket, namely a London Travelcard.

* the ticket <E to F> was not valid because the train was not travelling from E to F.

This ticket was valid, as shown to <Mr. Jones> because the National Routeing Guide provides that you can travel from E to F via points G, H, I and J.

Under the National Rail Conditions of Carriage, section 16,

"You may start, or break and resume, a journey (in either direction in the case of a return ticket) at any intermediate station, as long as the ticket you hold is valid for the trains you want to use."

This ticket <E to F> was therefore valid from I to J.

--
Having suffered such distressing treatment on my outbound journey from St Pancras, before returning from Leicester, I went to the ticket office there and they issued me with an 'Authority to Travel', which confirmed that my tickets were valid between Leicester and St Pancras. I have enclosed a copy of this.

I am writing to you therefore to withdraw this Unpaid Fares Notice, which should not have been issued. I also request you address the training issues with respect to your staff, in particular the claim that Oyster Cards are not valid on East Midlands trains.

I ask that you act within the next 14 days from the date of this letter, in order to avoid escalation and further costs for both parties.

Regards,
Derby


PS. RJ might know the best address/name to address this to?
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,818
Location
Back office
My MO is to do everything by the book and send correspondence to the generic IRCAS/Customer Relations address.

The appeals process is a waste of time for "complex" ticketing matters - you can't appeal to organisations who don't have the compentencies to decipher the validity of tickets they aren't familiar with - and it's your job as the customer to second guess what a TOC may or may not know about tickets.

I'd like to corroborate what soil said - I had no part in suggesting which tickets to use, I only provided my opinion as to the validity of what was suggested.
 
Last edited:

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
He said I was being "very obstructive" by not providing my DoB or signing the form, I told him I would happily do so if I was legally obliged to provide them but he couldn't prove that I had to. The back of the UPFN just says name and address too :)

Everyone will give you very good advice on the issue in hand on here, I wont because I dont want to get bogged down BUT the part that I have bolded means you tried to antagonise him. Yes you dont have to but please, dont be smug to the staff.

It may not have been as how you come across but remember, the staff are doing the best they can.

My advice to anyone,including the ones who get hoisted by my own RPIs, even when Im at my london terminal, is just give them the patience and time and be polite. I know it annoys the f**k out of them.

When this happens, amuse them,take what they give you and then contest it after. Its not the best solution but as time goes on I know there is more training for staff because of these issues. Dont make the RPI/Guard dig theri heels in.take it and then fight.
 

derby

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2013
Messages
22
Everyone will give you very good advice on the issue in hand on here, I wont because I dont want to get bogged down BUT the part that I have bolded means you tried to antagonise him. Yes you dont have to but please, dont be smug to the staff.

It may not have been as how you come across but remember, the staff are doing the best they can.

My advice to anyone,including the ones who get hoisted by my own RPIs, even when Im at my london terminal, is just give them the patience and time and be polite. I know it annoys the f**k out of them.

When this happens, amuse them,take what they give you and then contest it after. Its not the best solution but as time goes on I know there is more training for staff because of these issues. Dont make the RPI/Guard dig theri heels in.take it and then fight.

I'm sorry but I've got to draw the line here.

This member of staff was very much not doing the best he could.

I was completely polite and reasonable with him, but that is very different from going above and beyond what is required in an already bad situation for the customer.

I declined to give my date of birth when I "had to" in the same way I declined to pay the full fare when he said I "had to", I don't really see the problem here...
 

soil

Established Member
Joined
28 May 2012
Messages
2,311
Everyone will give you very good advice on the issue in hand on here, I wont because I dont want to get bogged down BUT the part that I have bolded means you tried to antagonise him. Yes you dont have to but please, dont be smug to the staff.

It may not have been as how you come across but remember, the staff are doing the best they can.

Some staff will do the best they can, some can't be arsed.

This is not specific to TOC staff, but applies to ALL staff of any firm.

It's plainly absurd to say that all staff are doing the best they can.

Some staff are antagonistic, some avoid conflict, some knowledgable, others ignorant.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
Oh no, I agree that some staff cant be arsed,got a few meself BUT they are only human.
And humans will alwys do what they think is right. Its not right but that is us, as humans.
 

Tibbs

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2012
Messages
894
Location
London
And humans will alwys do what they think is right. Its not right but that is us, as humans.

Where on earth did you pull that gem from?

I have a very positive view of the population in general, but even I know people do what they know is wrong through, fear, greed or even laziness. Cyclists jump red lights in London all the time, that's illegal and wrong and they know it, but they still do it. The guy who burgled my house knew it was wrong but did it to feed his habit.

And why do you think knowing your rights (as few we have, especially on the railways) and providing just the information you're obliged to give is being smug?

If I were in the same position, the guard would get my name and address and nothing more, with any other questions being answered by 'I'm sorry, I don't have to give you that information.' Said politely but firmly. Why is the guard asking for information to which he isn't entitled?

There are so many posts on here about people talking themselves into trouble by getting stressed and unintentionally saying the wrong thing, it's irresponsible to suggest that people give out more information than they have to.

Far better in a pressured situation like this to keep your mouth shut beyond what you have to say.
 

jb

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2011
Messages
369
It sounds to me like anything less than a shrugging acceptance of the full fare would have been regarded as "obstructive" and "smug".

We're fairly often reminded that passengers facing genuine ticket irregularities call into question the attitude and approach of staff facing them. Well it cuts both ways.
 

Monty

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2012
Messages
2,370
If you've not signed a UPFN it won't be valid anyway!

This is not true, signing a PFN or a UFN means you are confirm any details you have given are correct, you understand you have 21 days to pay the outstanding fare or penalty fare and that you can also appeal with 21 days.

Refusing to sign does not remove your liability to pay, I often would read the whole notice aloud and then endorse it 'Signature Refused' and then get a colleague to countersign the notice with a badge number in front of the passenger.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
If you've not signed a UPFN it won't be valid anyway!
This is not true, signing a PFN or a UFN means you are confirm any details you have given are correct, . . . . .
There's potential for some misunderstanding here.

There is no question of validity arising from whether or not the debtor (the passenger) signs it - the liability has already been incurred by the passenger's act of travelling.
There is a requirement for the representative of the Railway Company to authorise the issue of the Notice by way of a signature.

It wasn't clear whether the "you" referred to by 156441 was the passenger or the Inspector (though I took it to refer to the passenger which would be consistent with posts above).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top