cactustwirly
Established Member
They're very basic these daysThey operate the low cost carrier model (yield managed, single fares only, luggage paid separately etc) but I'd agree are not bargain basement and also I'd agree they generally treat customers better than any of the true bargain basement carriers.
In US terms they are perhaps analogous to JetBlue.
With regard to what they compete on, they mostly avoid going head to head with Ryanair or Wizz for the reasons you state. They mostly compete with full service carriers.
Not much different to Wizz. They all charge you for any sort of luggage.
My last flight with them wasn't much better than Ryanair. Charges for everything, basic plane and rushed chaotic boarding.
I liked easyJet when it was good, but since COVID gone rapidly downhill pretending to be Wizz and Ryanair.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
AF/KLM have SAS to sort out, I doubt they have the resources to deal with easyJet at the same timeThe Middle East conflict is hollowing out the airlines' share prices and if you have the money it's a good time to try and force a takeover.
But absolutely nothing has ever been improved by the involvement of US private equity. Combining that expertise with AF/KLM's infamous service standards sounds like the fast road to bankruptcy to me.
EasyJet are many things- some good, some bad- but one thing they are not is low cost.
Their customer service levels, especially in disruption, are some of the best in the industry. But that costs money and they're competing in the part of the sector where the headline price is all that anybody ever reads. I'd rather walk barefoot than ever fly WizzAir again, but they're cheaper than EasyJet, and that's what EasyJet have chosen to compete on.
They have a shareholding in Virgin Atlantic which is struggling also, been loss making for a number of years.