• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

East-West Rail (EWR): Oxford-Bletchley construction progress

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Y

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,498
Location
Yorkshire
Just a gentle reminder this is for actual progress updates.

I have moved some recent posts - discussing what might or might not happen - into the existing thread below:

East-West Rail (EWR): Alternative options and speculation

I just come across these people https://cambridgeapproaches.org/our-objectives/ . We exist to ensure that, first and foremost, the EWR Co. fully evaluates a northern approach to Cambridge, first advocated by the CamBed RailRoad (CBRR) community-based think tank. The northern route would...
www.railforums.co.uk www.railforums.co.uk
 
fgwrich

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,654
Location
Hampshire
Plenty of photos this week of progress by Phil Marsh, with plenty of Before, During and Now pictures;

Near Poundon:

Between Launton and Poundon:

Launton (former) Station site:

Current progress at Calvert - HS2 Ramp looking good:

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


New Post Below:

More positive news from Winslow as the NTC has now laid the first (Oxford bound) line through the new station:


 
Last edited:
S

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
From Modern Railways, March, p. 12:

Over half the track between Bicester and Bletchley has been laid, according to a talk on 2 Feb by EWR Alliance director to Bucks CC transport committee.

Infrastructure work is on schedule.

Concern has been expressed that no operator has been named and that the first passenger trains may not run until well into 2025 due to lack of operational readiness.

The section around the HS2 bridge is due to be handed over from HS2 to EWR Alliance for tracklaying by "the middle of this year". Repeated requests from Bucks CC to HS2 for a copy of the interface and handover documentation "have been stonewalled".

Network Rail is continuing to pursue ways of making the Aylesbury spur affordable by DfT's criteria before the TWAO powers expire, which they will do unless work begins by the start of 2025.
 
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
Here’s another YouTube drone video only recently uploaded but could be a few weeks old. The video is showing overhead views of the section a mile or so east of Winslow:
 
M

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
12,018
Location
here to eternity
Just a reminder that the thread is for discussion of construction updates only.

If anyone wants to discuss anything else such as the operator of the new line then they are welcome to start a new thread in the appropriate forum section

thanks :)
 
S

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,635
Location
Crewe
Bletchley footbridge to be finally installed end of April according to WMT Properties team. The bridge has had some modifications which is why it was installed and removed again
 
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
You Tube video from the Lowi Family, thanks.


We have a signal installed.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I really hope the HS2 debacle does not affect the construction timetable of EWR. I did raise my suspicions further up the thread, and I expect the worst. I can see the east and west sections of EWR completed and a yawning gap at Calvert courtesy of HS2.
 
jfowkes

jfowkes

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
1,271
Neen Sollars said:
I really hope the HS2 debacle does not affect the construction timetable of EWR. I did raise my suspicions further up the thread, and I expect the worst. I can see the east and west sections of EWR completed and a yawning gap at Calvert courtesy of HS2.
Click to expand...
I thought the HS2 delays, if any, would be on the Euston-OOC and north-of-Birmingham sections. Very unlikely to affect EWR works I suspect.
 
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
JF, Hope you are right. My concerns are for HS2 construction delays at this particular site, not the HS2 project as a whole.
 
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
You tube video from Lineside South East. You have to stick with it to get some interesting new views of Bicester to Bletchley construction.

 
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
The Planner said:
The bridge over HS2 at Calvert is already in place.
Click to expand...
Thanks, but embankments and associated works are not. I was under the impression HS2 were responsible for construction of part of EWR at this complex intersection? Having two sets of construction teams working on different projects at the same site would not seem a good idea?
 
T

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,729
Bletchleyite said:
It's Aylesbury that is messed up with HS2, but that's not part of the initial work anyway.
Click to expand...
A proportion of that is sorting out the bat mitigation tunnel down at Greatmoor woods as well as E-W cost constraints.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Neen Sollars said:
Thanks, but embankments and associated works are not. I was under the impression HS2 were responsible for construction of part of EWR at this complex intersection? Having two sets of construction teams working on different projects at the same site would not seem a good idea?
Click to expand...
Its only bad if there is no integration on the project management front and no one talks to each other. Though I suspect the civils earthworks are relatively straightforward if the structure is in.
 
S

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
Neen Sollars said:
Thanks, but embankments and associated works are not. I was under the impression HS2 were responsible for construction of part of EWR at this complex intersection? Having two sets of construction teams working on different projects at the same site would not seem a good idea?
Click to expand...
I don't think they are on the same site. A section of the EWR route for about a mile each side of the HS2 crossing is in the hands of HS2, with no access to EWR. HS2 Ltd are supposed to complete the bridges and earthworks by the middle of this year and then hand it back to EWR who will lay the track.
 
fgwrich

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,654
Location
Hampshire
snowball said:
I don't think they are on the same site. A section of the EWR route for about a mile each side of the HS2 crossing is in the hands of HS2, with no access to EWR. HS2 Ltd are supposed to complete the bridges and earthworks by the middle of this year and then hand it back to EWR who will lay the track.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure if I mentioned it in one of my posts above, but this was the state of play at the E-W / HS2 crossing a month ago. The road bridge is still in the way, so there may be an issue with diverting the road? Otherwise the ramp on the Oxford side is complete and ballasted, and I believe the other side may be, up to the edge of the bridge site, too.

 

Attachments

  • AF3DA0F8-7B5B-4D10-9442-58180D66E6F6.jpeg
    AF3DA0F8-7B5B-4D10-9442-58180D66E6F6.jpeg
    163.1 KB · Views: 169
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
snowball said:
I don't think they are on the same site. A section of the EWR route for about a mile each side of the HS2 crossing is in the hands of HS2, with no access to EWR. HS2 Ltd are supposed to complete the bridges and earthworks by the middle of this year and then hand it back to EWR who will lay the track.
Click to expand...
Thanks, That is the impression I was under, essentially EWR just lay the track and do S&T on the bed prepared by HS2. The Aylsebury spur section junction will also be prepared by HS2 and no doubt the small section of junction track and out of service S&T done by EWR. You can clearly see the boundary of construction responsibility on the Marston Vale video above. The "ski ramp" over HS2 is being constructed by HS2?
Edit: Can clearly be seen in post #1008 above which I have just seen!
 
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
Neen Sollars said:
Thanks, That is the impression I was under, essentially EWR just lay the track and do S&T on the bed prepared by HS2. The Aylsebury spur section junction will also be prepared by HS2 and no doubt the small section of junction track and out of service S&T done by EWR. You can clearly see the boundary of construction responsibility on the Marston Vale video above. The "ski ramp" over HS2 is being constructed by HS2?
Edit: Can clearly be seen in post #1008 above which I have just seen!
Click to expand...
Not much of a “ski ramp” though. When I checked the HS2 drawings for the intersection area last year, (it’s in the closed HS2 thread somewhere), EWR basically crosses HS2 at what will be local ground level. I think many of the photos in this thread are significantly foreshortened and are not showing what it will look like when the landscaping is 100% complete.
 
fgwrich

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,654
Location
Hampshire
So I hadn’t realised that, part of the delay seems to be in the form of a road bridge being constructed over East West, after it crosses HS2 at Claydon loop.

In related news, the track laying has from the Western end has reached the boundary now, so fingers crossed it won’t be too long before we start to see more of the East West side opening up.

Latest update with photos from Phil Marsh here on twitter:


 
Last edited:
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
fgwrich said:
So I hadn’t realised that, part of the delay seems to be in the form of a road bridge being constructed over East West, after it crosses HS2 at Claydon loop.
Click to expand...
I think the idea was that the various north/south roads in that section could only be closed one at a time. The bridge you’re referring to, (I think OXD/27), takes Addison Road over the EWR tracks and the east end of the new infrastructure depot tracks, which is why the girders you can see are relatively long. It will be a much larger span overall than the previous brick arch. It’s possible that they won’t demolish the existing road bridge OXD/28 just next to HS2 and tie the new underbridge route in until there’s a nearby alternate route for traffic, the new bridge in the distance would seem to be the best alternative route.

(I edited my original bridge numbers, I forgot they’re decreasing from west to east. Although Phil Marsh’s second post is described as “view from bridge 29”, he’s actually on bridge 28 in one of them, that’s the one that gets replaced by an underpass.)

But another point shown in the photos is that the embankment east of the HS2 bridge appears relatively complete. So I don’t agree with the view posted earlier that EWR will be delayed by outstanding embankment works.
 
Last edited:
N

Neen Sollars

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2018
Messages
342
"But another point shown in the photos is that the embankment east of the HS2 bridge appears relatively complete. So I don’t agree with the view posted earlier that EWR will be delayed by outstanding embankment works".

But the other embankment is not? I think the suggestion the site (site) will not be handed over on time is contained in post #994.
 
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
Neen Sollars said:
"But another point shown in the photos is that the embankment east of the HS2 bridge appears relatively complete. So I don’t agree with the view posted earlier that EWR will be delayed by outstanding embankment works".

But the other embankment is not? I think the suggestion the site (site) will not be handed over on time is contained in post #994.
Click to expand...
The only gap in the embankment, having seen all the recent photos appears to be in the immediate vicinity of bridge OXD/28, ie the short distance just west of the HS2 bridge. So I don’t believe there’s a significant problem.
 
fgwrich

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,654
Location
Hampshire
Picking up on Bridge OXD 28 again, This week, Phil Marsh has captured the teams installing the beams to the bridge which will carry East West over the road (I missed the fact that these weren’t in place yet). So once that is complete, and work has been ramped up on the new replacement road, the old bridge can be demolished and the gaps between OXD & HS2 bridge can be filled in.



Phil also appears to have covered the section down to Quainton this week as well:


 
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
fgwrich said:
Picking up on Bridge OXD 28 again, This week, Phil Marsh has captured the teams installing the beams to the bridge which will carry East West over the road (I missed the fact that these weren’t in place yet). So once that is complete, and work has been ramped up on the new replacement road, the old bridge can be demolished and the gaps between OXD & HS2 bridge can be filled in.


Click to expand...
I think the pics of the intersection area progress are reassuring. I think it shouldn’t take that long to open the new road and divert traffic.

Then I‘m assuming the main construction plant access between HS2 sites on either side of EWR, (if needed), will have to be through the HS2 intersection bridge?

AIUI the local authority‘s stance is that any HS2 plant and heavy traffic cannot use the local road network?
 
S

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,308
tspaul26 said:
Not their decision to make
Click to expand...
I’m sure they can‘t prevent anything already allowed by the Act, but in general HS2 have already built separate haul roads along their worksites, and in some places they have had to build temporary overbridges to avoid flat road crossings. I believe it’s part of the reason comments on overhead videos often take the view it’s a ‘scar on the landscape’, even though it’s obvious much of the width of the present linear site will be fully reinstated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top