• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

East Kilbride/Barrhead electrification updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,558
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
I've never seen OLE mounted on tall brick columns before

Same here; Presumably it was not possible to put the masts at the back of the platform.

Does that mean the wires will extend onto the start of the single track section south of the station?

Looks like it, masts were in place south of Barrhead before the town was isolated from civilisation.
 

OB23Gone

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2022
Messages
186
Location
Glasgow
Same here; Presumably it was not possible to put the masts at the back of the platform.



Looks like it, masts were in place south of Barrhead before the town was isolated from civilisation.
There is a path beside the railway that comes of Gateside Rd. where it meets Graham Rd. There is a mast just there. This is where the up line crosses over to the down line and forms the onward single line towards Kilmarnock. Have driven further along Gateside Road but because of houses and trees have not seen any more. Not to say that there isn't or won't be. Still time to put them in. Big NR visit tomorrow with high hied yins going to have a look so probably be some sort of press release in next couple of days. Guys tidying up around the old gate to the, now gone,s ignal box for that reason
 
Joined
14 Mar 2021
Messages
211
Location
Glasgow
The contractor has installed the registration arms under the Cathcart Circle bridge and the Titwood Road bridge. They installed extensions to the balustrades on the pedestrian over-bridge and the rail bridge proper. They clamped together the contact and catenary wires where they pass under the bridges.

On either side of the Cathcart Circle bridge, there are devices mounted on the masts - are they surge arresters?
 

Attachments

  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 1.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 1.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 158
  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 2.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 2.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 153
  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 3.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 3.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 147
  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 4.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 4.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 144
  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 5.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 5.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 145
  • Cathcart Circle Underbridge 6.jpg
    Cathcart Circle Underbridge 6.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 159
  • Titwood Road Bridge 1.jpg
    Titwood Road Bridge 1.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 156
  • Titwood Road Bridge 2.jpg
    Titwood Road Bridge 2.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 163

OB23Gone

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2022
Messages
186
Location
Glasgow

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    478.4 KB · Views: 109
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    414.5 KB · Views: 100
  • 3.jpg
    3.jpg
    305.7 KB · Views: 112
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    382.1 KB · Views: 118
  • 5.jpg
    5.jpg
    396.2 KB · Views: 117

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,861
Location
Beeston (Notts)
The contractor has installed the registration arms under the Cathcart Circle bridge and the Titwood Road bridge. They installed extensions to the balustrades on the pedestrian over-bridge and the rail bridge proper. They clamped together the contact and catenary wires where they pass under the bridges.

On either side of the Cathcart Circle bridge, there are devices mounted on the masts - are they surge arresters?
Those devices are most definitely Surge Arresters.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
I've just found this video on refurbishment of semaphore signals at Lugton.

Edit: this appears to be the video mentioned but not linked in #1515.

 
Last edited:

Southsider

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2015
Messages
937
Just driven under Cross Arthurlie St bridge at Barrhead, interesting that the wires still don't extend beyond the western end of the platforms.
Do you mean towards Kilmarnock? I don’t think they’re intended to yet.
 

OB23Gone

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2022
Messages
186
Location
Glasgow
Just driven under Cross Arthurlie St bridge at Barrhead, interesting that the wires still don't extend beyond the western end of the platforms.
As of this afternoon the wires have still not been extended beyond the End of Commercial Road. There is 1 wire although which does, that is the Return wire that connects , on the outside, the masts but is not part of the pick up for trains. Someone may explain this better. That would be the wire you can see.
Whilst out stopped by Nitshill here is the latest on the progress on the underpass. To be completed by the 4th
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0168 Latest  on under pass Forum Resized.jpg
    DSC_0168 Latest on under pass Forum Resized.jpg
    805.5 KB · Views: 109

MadMac

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2008
Messages
1,498
Location
Moorpark, CA
See posts #1519, #1530 and #1532 which discuss the precise location of the end point of the currently proposed wiring.
There’ll be some sort of “overrun” onto the single line: also, when/if they decide to extend to Kilmarnock, it’s easier to connect into that. Unless redoubling is part of that…..
 

Southsider

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2015
Messages
937
A shot of East Kilbride station in the 1950s. (Mods: found on Facebook, please delete if not allowed)

IMG_0133.jpeg
 
Last edited:

InOban

On Moderation
Joined
12 Mar 2017
Messages
4,537
Presumably the hourly electric train will always use the bay platform, so in a sense the wires on the through tracks don't need any overrun? Would actually make it easier if it were decided to extend the double track and wires.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
Presumably the hourly electric train will always use the bay platform, so in a sense the wires on the through tracks don't need any overrun? Would actually make it easier if it were decided to extend the double track and wires.
Isn't the purpose of an overrun to prevent dewirement in the event of a train being wrongly routed?

I've been wondering what the next electrification in that area will be (accepting that it probably won't be for several years). Would it be Barrhead to Kilmarnock or Kilmarnock to Barassie? The latter might require a new feeder station at Kilmarnock, which is not in the current contract for six sites, but which would be needed for the eventual decarbonisation of Kilmarnock to Carlisle. You could argue that Barrhead to Kilmarnock should not be a high priority, as when BEMUs finally arrive, they will enable Glasgow-Kilmarnock services, turning round at Kilmarnock, to be operated from the Glasgow-Barrhead wires.
 
Last edited:

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,304
Without any structures in the way there's no real reason not to wire up the bit beyond the station. Those few hundred metres of wire and a few OHLE supports aren't what makes or breaks the financial viability of an electrification scheme.

I am also curious about where they'll wire up next. Wiring needs to start from a grid feeder station. There's no shortage of electricity available in and around Kilmarnock, according to OpenInfraMap. There's a 275kV substation in the town and a 400kV substation just south of there.

With these being on the southern side, and as the G&SW line is still double track there, it seems pretty likely that the grid feeder will be on that side and so the Barrhead-Kilmarnock wiring will come later. Redoubling, resignalling and electrification are all projects that make sense being done in one fell swoop. Until then, BEMUs will work just fine.

Indeed, the redoubling might end up being quite late. Not much really happens by redoubling/electrifying the Barrhead-Kilmarnock line on its own. It's only once the wires reach Carlisle is there really a benefit for freight and diverted WCML services. So, you may as well leave Barrhead-Kilmarnock until the very end.
 

380101

Member
Joined
18 Feb 2015
Messages
1,141
Without any structures in the way there's no real reason not to wire up the bit beyond the station. Those few hundred metres of wire and a few OHLE supports aren't what makes or breaks the financial viability of an electrification scheme.

I am also curious about where they'll wire up next. Wiring needs to start from a grid feeder station. There's no shortage of electricity available in and around Kilmarnock, according to OpenInfraMap. There's a 275kV substation in the town and a 400kV substation just south of there.

With these being on the southern side, and as the G&SW line is still double track there, it seems pretty likely that the grid feeder will be on that side and so the Barrhead-Kilmarnock wiring will come later. Redoubling, resignalling and electrification are all projects that make sense being done in one fell swoop. Until then, BEMUs will work just fine.

Indeed, the redoubling might end up being quite late. Not much really happens by redoubling/electrifying the Barrhead-Kilmarnock line on its own. It's only once the wires reach Carlisle is there really a benefit for freight and diverted WCML services. So, you may as well leave Barrhead-Kilmarnock until the very end.

The overhead stantions extend South beyond the platforms to the end of the extended run off from platform 1 and across to the single line.
 

92002

Established Member
Joined
27 Mar 2014
Messages
1,255
Location
Clydebank
Without any structures in the way there's no real reason not to wire up the bit beyond the station. Those few hundred metres of wire and a few OHLE supports aren't what makes or breaks the financial viability of an electrification scheme.

I am also curious about where they'll wire up next. Wiring needs to start from a grid feeder station. There's no shortage of electricity available in and around Kilmarnock, according to OpenInfraMap. There's a 275kV substation in the town and a 400kV substation just south of there.

With these being on the southern side, and as the G&SW line is still double track there, it seems pretty likely that the grid feeder will be on that side and so the Barrhead-Kilmarnock wiring will come later. Redoubling, resignalling and electrification are all projects that make sense being done in one fell swoop. Until then, BEMUs will work just fine.

Indeed, the redoubling might end up being quite late. Not much really happens by redoubling/electrifying the Barrhead-Kilmarnock line on its own. It's only once the wires reach Carlisle is there really a benefit for freight and diverted WCML services. So, you may as well leave Barrhead-Kilmarnock until the very end.
However if Barassie to Kilmarnock was done first after Barrhead was open
It could probably be fed from the Ayr lines. With a new feeder at Kilmarnock the line could be finished back to Barrhead. It may even be possible to feed from the Ayr lines all the way to Barrhead.

Later GSW could be added. Although passenger numbers there may not make the sums add up.
 

Falcon1200

Established Member
Joined
14 Jun 2021
Messages
6,558
Location
Neilston, East Renfrewshire
Presumably the hourly electric train will always use the bay platform, so in a sense the wires on the through tracks don't need any overrun?

Barrhead has an extremely flexible track layout, with trains able to use both through platforms in either direction, so should the bay be unavailable for any reason the terminators can reverse there instead.

I've been wondering what the next electrification in that area will be (accepting that it probably won't be for several years). Would it be Barrhead to Kilmarnock or Kilmarnock to Barassie?

I would hope both at the same time! Electrifying Barassie/Kilmarnock on its own would have little operational benefit, whereas doing it and Kilmarnock/Barrhead would facilitate a regular Glasgow/Ayr via Kilmarnock service, and allow the sets for the early trains from Kilmarnock to stable at Ayr Townhead, as the DMUs do now.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
I would hope both at the same time! Electrifying Barassie/Kilmarnock on its own would have little operational benefit, whereas doing it and Kilmarnock/Barrhead would facilitate a regular Glasgow/Ayr via Kilmarnock service, and allow the sets for the early trains from Kilmarnock to stable at Ayr Townhead, as the DMUs do now.
It seems to me that you are not taking sufficient account of Scotland's philosophy of BEMUs, and partial electrification as an initial step. They are not proposing to waste time electrifying the whole of the Borders line from the start or the whole of Fife from the start. With one but not both of Barrhead-Kilmarnock and Kilmarnock-Barassie wired, BEMUs could stable at Ayr and run a service between there and Glasgow.

I may be making some false assumptions about redeployability of existing rolling stock! Existing rolling stock and service patterns are not subjects I know much about!
 
Last edited:

92002

Established Member
Joined
27 Mar 2014
Messages
1,255
Location
Clydebank
It seems to me that you are not taking sufficient account of Scotland's philosophy of BEMUs, and partial electrification as an initial step. They are not proposing to waste time electrifying the whole of the Borders line from the start or the whole of Fife from the start. With one but not both of Barrhead-Kilmarnock and Kilmarnock-Barassie wired, BEMUs could stable at Ayr and run a service between there and Glasgow.

I may be making some false assumptions about redeployability of existing rolling stock! Existing rolling stock and service patterns are not subjects I know much about!
Think the slight problem is ScotRail have yet to order BEMUs and delivery is quite long.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
Think the slight problem is ScotRail have yet to order BEMUs and delivery is quite long.
Yes, I'm concerned about that too, but any further electrification in the Kilmarnock area would undoubtedly be coming after both the Borders line and the Fife area, both of which are partial electrification schemes dependent on the delivery of BEMUs.
 

OB23Gone

Member
Joined
22 Aug 2022
Messages
186
Location
Glasgow
There’ll be some sort of “overrun” onto the single line: also, when/if they decide to extend to Kilmarnock, it’s easier to connect into that. Unless redoubling is part of that…..
WIRES NOW IN THRU STATION TO LIMIT
 

Attachments

  • 1 Commercial Road.jpg
    1 Commercial Road.jpg
    452 KB · Views: 147
  • 2  From Barrhead Waste Disposal Depot.jpg
    2 From Barrhead Waste Disposal Depot.jpg
    483.1 KB · Views: 143
  • 3  From Waste Disposal To Nearer Station.jpg
    3 From Waste Disposal To Nearer Station.jpg
    377.7 KB · Views: 141
  • 4 Near Old Signal Box.jpg
    4 Near Old Signal Box.jpg
    528.7 KB · Views: 124
  • 5 Platform 1 Through The Station.jpg
    5 Platform 1 Through The Station.jpg
    489.1 KB · Views: 124
  • 6  Last Mast.jpg
    6 Last Mast.jpg
    495.9 KB · Views: 126
  • 7  Looking Back through the Station.jpg
    7 Looking Back through the Station.jpg
    606.5 KB · Views: 124
  • 8  Zeck Heading to Platform 3...jpg
    8 Zeck Heading to Platform 3...jpg
    493.6 KB · Views: 127
  • 9 Almost there on all counts.jpg
    9 Almost there on all counts.jpg
    500.2 KB · Views: 128

takno

Verified Rep - Traksy
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,592
Yes, I'm concerned about that too, but any further electrification in the Kilmarnock area would undoubtedly be coming after both the Borders line and the Fife area, both of which are partial electrification schemes dependent on the delivery of BEMUs.
I know the Fife route is, but I thought borders was supposed to be continuous? Doesn't seem like it would be the hardest line ever to do in full.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,257
I know the Fife route is, but I thought borders was supposed to be continuous? Doesn't seem like it would be the hardest line ever to do in full.
Power supply closer to Edinburgh is the issue (NatGrid long lead time) so the plan is to electrify the southern end and bridge the gap with battery till the Edinburgh area power supply gets enhanced so wires could be powered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top