• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Do Voyagers have small feet?

Status
Not open for further replies.

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,682
Location
Scotland
Is it just me or do Voyager (Class 220) wheels look too small? I know they work perfectly well but they seem ill-proportioned as compared to other classes.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
4,005
Location
St Neots
They're special lightweight ones which don't have much covering their outer faces compared to most units.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,202
Is it just me or do Voyager (Class 220) wheels look too small? I know they work perfectly well but they seem ill-proportioned as compared to other classes.

Its not just you!
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,665
Location
Nottingham
The inside frame bogies make the wheels much more prominent than other stock, and the eye tends to focus on the shiny brake discs which are smaller than the wheels themselves. Also the body of the 220 is basically the same as the 221, but that has a much more chunky bogie and also needs to have enough body-bogie gap to allow for tilting. As the floor level of the two classes above rail is the same, the 220 ends up with a very big gap between the bogie and the body, which also tends to make the wheels look small.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,573
Location
Macclesfield
The difference isn't as great as you might think, but, yes, the B5005 inside frame bogies fitted to the 220s have a smaller wheel diameter than is usual: 780mm, compared, for example, to the 840mm diameter of the wheels fitted to the various Sprinter classes.
 

Clip

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2010
Messages
10,821
Is it just me or do Voyager (Class 220) wheels look too small? I know they work perfectly well but they seem ill-proportioned as compared to other classes.

Nope they just have big socks which make it appear they have small feet
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,491
Are the wheels on the class 444s a similar size?

I remember when the class 442s first came into service seeing how much smaller the wheels were on them compared with the old slam door stock
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
1,013
The difference isn't as great as you might think, but, yes, the B5005 inside frame bogies fitted to the 220s have a smaller wheel diameter than is usual: 780mm, compared, for example, to the 840mm diameter of the wheels fitted to the various Sprinter classes.

I remember reading about that bogie.. Launched the same day the first 165 was handed over at York.. 24ish years ago!
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,050
Location
Bristol
If you want to see some really small wheels, look at the flats used to move the tall shipping containers.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,181
The new class 700s for Thameslink are using a similar design.

Yep, the Siemens bogie is a equivalent product to the lightweight Bombardier FLEXX Eco but developed especially for the Desiro City.
 

ScotTrains

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2014
Messages
415
Location
Scotland
Is there any noticeable difference to acceleration/ top speed between the 220 and 221 due to the different wheel diameters?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top