Fine control at low speed, and lines of sight. The Deltic nose is higher so the cab is also higher, with the side windows curved inwards, instead of being vertical.Why would it differ from, say, a Class 40?
Fine control at low speed, and lines of sight. The Deltic nose is higher so the cab is also higher, with the side windows curved inwards, instead of being vertical.Why would it differ from, say, a Class 40?
Nevertheless Deltics did run to Cleethorpes in the final years (both of the class and of direct services from London to South Humberside). So how were services handled there?Fine control at low speed, and lines of sight. The Deltic nose is higher so the cab is also higher, with the side windows curved inwards, instead of being vertical.
In the twilight era of the Deltics some worked to and from Hull, and they made some use of the bay platforms at York, but my recollection is that the loco would be shunt released by the station pilot. I suspect that the same happened for Deltics at other locations, though unsure about Cleethorpes, I can't remember if they had a station pilot.
See above. Cleethorpes did have a run round see here:Nevertheless Deltics did run to Cleethorpes in the final years (both of the class and of direct services from London to South Humberside). So how were services handled there?
Cleaners descend on an arrival from Manchester Piccadilly at Cleethorpes headed by 31448 of Immingham on 28 August 1986.
Would have thought that the nightmare would have been doing it at Kings Cross at all - rather than with any specific class of loco. The problem in big cities (as opposed to seaside termini, for example) is that the carriage sidings were usually a relatively long way out. At King's Cross , any such move would have involved propelling through tunnels up steepish gradients (I believe that one of the quirks of the ECML is that its steepest gradients are right off the platform ends at either end [out of Kings Cross and into Waverley]). Running round at termini requires either a centre road between platform roads (often sacrificed as stations got busier) or the adjacent platform to be empty - not often the case at busy London termini.Why would it differ from, say, a Class 40?
Fine control at low speed, and lines of sight. The Deltic nose is higher so the cab is also higher, with the side windows curved inwards, instead of being vertical.
1970A Stratford Class 37 in my day.
Also a big city station was more likely to have frequent enough service for the loco off an arriving train to be used on a departure within a reasonable time. Seaside termini also had many excursions, which were not part of the regular timetable so couldn't share resources with other trains. They would almost always have to planned on the basis that the stock sat idle near the terminus until it was time to form the return working, and the same loco probably also worked both ways.Would have thought that the nightmare would have been doing it at Kings Cross at all - rather than with any specific class of loco. The problem in big cities (as opposed to seaside termini, for example) is that the carriage sidings were usually a relatively long way out. At King's Cross , any such move would have involved propelling through tunnels up steepish gradients (I believe that one of the quirks of the ECML is that its steepest gradients are right off the platform ends at either end [out of Kings Cross and into Waverley]). Running round at termini requires either a centre road between platform roads (often sacrificed as stations got busier) or the adjacent platform to be empty - not often the case at busy London termini.
As has been stated elsewhere, the intensive use of coaching stock that we know today is a relatively modern phenomenon - inbound trains would frequently disappear off to the carriage sidings for cleaning, watering, stocking (restaurant cars etc) - closely followed by the inbound train engine.
I think this was why the Eastern Region (ER) had originally wanted 23 Deltics and the fleet of 22 made things just that bit tighter. I believe once DP2 was assigned to the ER it was almost treated as a Deltic for diagramming (happy to be proved wrong on that!), so it's write-off in the Thirsk accident removed that buffer.The original question was about Deltics at Kings Cross.
The subsequent discussion suggests a lack of appreciation of the uniqueness of Deltic operation.
The Deltics were a small fleet and there were ECML trains booked for Deltic haulage that had faster timings than those booked for Type 4s. Up to the introduction of HSTs the ECML long distance service was not regular interval, but designed to make maximum use of the Deltics, with everything else fitting around that.
Very unlikely, I think. As far as I remember its regular job was the 1220 to Hull and back.I think this was why the Eastern Region (ER) had originally wanted 23 Deltics and the fleet of 22 made things just that bit tighter. I believe once DP2 was assigned to the ER it was almost treated as a Deltic for diagramming (happy to be proved wrong on that!), so it's write-off in the Thirsk accident removed that buffer.
It was the siding of quietly ticking over light engines that is my abiding memory of watching the overnight and pre-DVT services at Euston.Yes, the Waterloo loco-releases were a very sprightly affair.
Euston, conversely - surprising, in light of its intensive usage - I'd see 85s, 86s & 87s sometimes sat at the buffers for ages.
Your post has wonderfully conjured up my memories of that soundIt was the siding of quietly ticking over light engines that is my abiding memory of watching the overnight and pre-DVT services at Euston.

Your post has wonderfully conjured up my memories of that sound![]()

The original Eastern Region proposal was for a fleet of 23 Deltic locos. The British Transport Commission knocked that back to 22.I think this was why the Eastern Region (ER) had originally wanted 23 Deltics and the fleet of 22 made things just that bit tighter. I believe once DP2 was assigned to the ER it was almost treated as a Deltic for diagramming (happy to be proved wrong on that!), so it's write-off in the Thirsk accident removed that buffer.
I've seen it in action. There was a wooden box with an electric ground frame switch at the front of the platform behind the buffers. Suppose it was there when time was of the essence, as the PSB couldn't see what was going on.Piccadilly platforms 5 & 6 used once a day by the engine for the Harwich boat train. Arrive platform 5 13:18 and stop short of the buffers. Engine run round through platform 6. Train departs 15:15. As in the 1977 timetable. Never a Deltic, though (a class 45 usually). Run-round between 13:35 and 13:55 between booked services for platform 6.
He also has a clip of the same thing happening at the other end of the WCML at Glasgow Central (timestamped vid below). You can make out an 87 following the 86 and it's train out of Platform 3 before a 104 DMU blocks the view:
I've just been watching a few videos on YouTube of shunt moves, so thanks to the early videographers who recorded what was the mundane at the time!
spompeytransportvideo has a good example of the original train loco following the train out of the platform right at the end of the video linked below.
Certainly later than that, as I didn't start taking an interest until 1972, and 37s remained on them at least until the service was diveretred away from the "Joint" line the following year. 1M72, complete with LNER buffet car.(North CVoujntry Continental class 37s) 1970
I've just been watching a few videos on YouTube of shunt moves, so thanks to the early videographers who recorded what was the mundane at the time!
spompeytransportvideo has a good example of the original train loco following the train out of the platform right at the end of the video linked below.
He also has a clip of the same thing happening at the other end of the WCML at Glasgow Central (timestamped vid below). You can make out an 87 following the 86 and it's train out of Platform 3 before a 104 DMU blocks the view: