What thoughts on England's choice of players for the imminent 50 over games against New Zealand etc and, beyond that, the World Cup which kicks off with a game between England and NZ on 5th October? Although the fifteen players for the WC ( plus three reserves) don't have to be named just yet, there's a good indication in the ones that have already appeared.
My initial thought was that it was a very conservative collection, and quite aged, even before Stokes was added to the mix, as batsman only, It is in fact basically the same side that won the 2019 World Cup so narrowly, minus the retired Morgan and Plunkett (remember him?!). Archer's name is only missing because of his enduring injury, but there's talk he might be added as a reserve in the hope-against-hope that he might be fit to play later in the tournament, despite no match practice.
On the subject of age, the oldest team to have won the competition had an average age of 31 years and 4 months, whereas the likely England XI has one of 32 years and 10 months. Given how much more important speed and dexterity of fielding is now, this cannot help England. Stokes, Bairstow (a boundary racer-round before his injury almost a year ago) and Ali, by no means the only ones, don't inspire too much confidence in me in saving runs.
As for the batting, like so many I can't comprehend Brook's omission. I'd have him in place of Livingstone, who's a T20 show pony as far as I'm concerned. Brook proved the other night at Headingley he could hit the ball as far as Livingstone, and with less effort and more style as well. As for Livingstone's bowling, my other replacement (Jacks for Roy) more than makes up, with Jacks's proven in test cricket in India to boot. I saw a statistic regarding the number of 70 plus innings by Roy, as opening bat, in his last 60 odd appearances for all teams, and it was either one or two! Not nearly good enough. The Hundred also revealed in two or three innings at least his apparent befuddlement at the start of an innings. Salt must also be given consideration, and his wicketkeeping might just be needed too.
Willey, Topley, Sam Curran = wow! Are so many teams susceptible to not especially fast left arm bowling in 50 over, not 20 over, cricket? Sam Curran, with his variations plus his batting and fielding, should certainly be there, but Willey couldn't get into the team last time. India, I remember, had a left arm seam obsession at a previous World Cup, which they failed to win by a long margin. Woakes is a great bowler in English conditions, but...Wood, I guess, is there because Archer may not be, and I wish him well, not least on the injury front. Atkinson is an unknown quantity. but I've have given Tongue a chance.
Buttler's a great guy though, without a huge ego, and he deserves to lead a winning side imo much as Stokes does with the test team.