• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Lewis C

New Member
Joined
27 Jan 2018
Messages
4
Why can’t we just have a yellow stripe?
Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.

That doesn't explain why it's yellow on the 222s (perhaps due to the white background), nor why it's not a Champagne stripe. Ultimately up to the Design Team providing it meets any relevant legislation/guidelines.

I know someone internally pushed for a yellow stripe but it would seem that hasn't happened.

*Edit for typo
 
Last edited:

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,667
Location
Derby
Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.

That doesn't explain why it's yellow on the 222s (perhaps due to the white background), nor why it's not a Champagne stripe. Ultimately up to the Design Team providing it means any relevant legislation/guidelines.

I know someone internally pushed for a yellow stripe but it would seem that hasn't happened.
Just imagine the people who use more than one train operator. First class area is presented differently. You can see why British Rail had a standard. At least with Voyagers, a yellow bar on the coupling indicates the first class end . Of course, now Real Time Trains shows it too.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,867
Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.

That doesn't explain why it's yellow on the 222s (perhaps due to the white background), nor why it's not a Champagne stripe. Ultimately up to the Design Team providing it means any relevant legislation/guidelines.

I know someone internally pushed for a yellow stripe but it would seem that hasn't happened.
This is where designers need to be told to take their crayons elsewhere. It's change for the sake of change - it ought to be standardised identification. Hopefully GBR will sort out this out as part of a re-branding.
 

STINT47

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2020
Messages
874
Location
Nottingham
A yellow stripe is often used to denote first class not only in this country but on the continent as well. EMR should stick with it.
 

Lyle_Lanley

Member
Joined
13 May 2020
Messages
18
Location
London
This is where designers need to be told to take their crayons elsewhere. It's change for the sake of change - it ought to be standardised identification. Hopefully GBR will sort out this out as part of a re-branding.
Or certainly at the very least told when creating any new designs that there are already some industry standard guidelines that must be adhered to. This surely must already be the case for safety or accessibility related reasons, but it would be good if it extended to “norms” like easily identifiable First Class or bicycle carriages.
 

al2000

Member
Joined
28 Jul 2019
Messages
11
Looks like a ten car test has just pulled into Derby. Will try and get a photo..

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Looks like a ten car test has just pulled into Derby. Will try and get a photo..
 

Attachments

  • IMG20250908120317~2.jpg
    IMG20250908120317~2.jpg
    3 MB · Views: 353

Jacob Porrett

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2022
Messages
1,968
Location
Telford
Looks like a ten car test has just pulled into Derby. Will try and get a photo..

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

This?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


This?
810003 and 810004

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


The pair go back to Old Dalby after their to London.
 
Last edited:

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
810001 is due to be dragged top and tail Old Dalby to Merchant Park tomorrow.
 
Last edited:

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
Apologies if I missed it, but does anyone in here know how many of the 33 Class 810 units have been built?
Can't tell you how many built, but units up to 810018 (excluding 002 & 017) all seen outside at Newton Aycliffe.
 

InTheEastMids

Established Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,404
Can't even remember if this is supposed to be news or not, but it certainly won't surprise anybody here. Harborough MP (and given some of his statements, possible Rail UK Speculative Forum lurker) Neil O'Brien has had DfT apparently confirm that the 810 entry into service is now 2026.

Link is to Harborough FM news website

East Midlands Railway’s fleet of Aurora Intercity trains were due start running this year, but will not enter service until sometime in 2026, after reportedly facing a series of teething problems during testing.

DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
“We expect EMR to ensure that their new, modern intercity trains are introduced as quickly and smoothly as possible.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
Can't even remember if this is supposed to be news or not, but it certainly won't surprise anybody here. Harborough MP (and given some of his statements, possible Rail UK Speculative Forum lurker) Neil O'Brien has had DfT apparently confirm that the 810 entry into service is now 2026.

Link is to Harborough FM news website



DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
Regards getting the 810s into service, I can't see what the Dft can actually do to get them into service earlier.

Hitachi are the issue, for not building a train to the quality and standard required.
The faults have been discussed here many many times, none of which can be blamed (for once) at the dft.
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.

I’m not sure that it does - it simply states that they’re expected to get them into service as quickly as possible, which isn’t unreasonable. It’s hardly EMR’s fault that the product hasn’t been up to scratch from a design and built quality perspective.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,212
Location
West Wiltshire
Regards getting the 810s into service, I can't see what the Dft can actually do to get them into service earlier.

Hitachi are the issue, for not building a train to the quality and standard required.
The faults have been discussed here many many times, none of which can be blamed (for once) at the dft.
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.

The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.

The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.
If a builder comes to you and says they can build it, you trust them. Especially a Japanese company! Again, I can't see how that can be blamed by Dft.

And. Actually was it not Abellio who ordered the train? So they selected the design etc?
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,794
Location
Somewhere, not in London
If a builder comes to you and says they can build it, you trust them. Especially a Japanese company! Again, I can't see how that can be blamed by Dft.

And. Actually was it not Abellio who ordered the train? So they selected the design etc?
The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,867
The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain?
So that was what was meant when we were told we'd get Japanese levels of reliability from them!
 

43066

Veteran Member
Joined
24 Nov 2019
Messages
12,089
Location
London
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.

The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.

But if Hitachi, as the manufacturer, states that they could build what was requested, then they’re the experts, and it seems reasonable for the DfT (or whomever) to rely on that. There should be strong contractual safeguards in place to deal with late delivery etc. and if there aren’t, perhaps that’s where the DfT has failed to negotiate properly.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,918
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.

The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.

DfT neither chose the design or reviewed the tenders.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain
What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?

And when has an 8Xx Suffered from rain inside the train as that is not something I've heard about, seen, or read about?
 

tfw756rider

On Moderation
Joined
30 Nov 2024
Messages
1,994
Location
Wales (sometimes in England), thanks for replying!
Can't tell you how many built, but units up to 810018 (excluding 002 & 017) all seen outside at Newton Aycliffe.
Thanks, so at least about 16 / half-ish then.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Can't even remember if this is supposed to be news or not, but it certainly won't surprise anybody here. Harborough MP (and given some of his statements, possible Rail UK Speculative Forum lurker) Neil O'Brien has had DfT apparently confirm that the 810 entry into service is now 2026.

Link is to Harborough FM news website



DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
It has been 2026 for at least a few months, but always good to have additional confirmation.
 

Aspen90

Member
Joined
12 Sep 2018
Messages
262
Location
Leicester
It doesn’t help matters that EMR have such abysmal comms. They’re always ‘approached for comment’ but either ignore or give one line responses. Where’s Will Rogers giving updates on this shambles? Wouldn’t get any of this from David Horne at LNER - they know how to do PR.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,212
Location
West Wiltshire
It doesn’t help matters that EMR have such abysmal comms. They’re always ‘approached for comment’ but either ignore or give one line responses. Where’s Will Rogers giving updates on this shambles? Wouldn’t get any of this from David Horne at LNER - they know how to do PR.

EMR have removed introduction date from the aurora page on their website.

However they have left it in their news pages, eg this one which says
The Hitachi built bi-mode trains will transform the experience of customers as they travel on the Midland Main Line when introduced during 2025 and throughout 2026.

which rather implies remainder during 2026, and nothing slipping into 2027 etc
 

BigB

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
343
Location
Scotland
What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?

And when has an 8Xx Suffered from rain inside the train as that is not something I've heard about, seen, or read about?
I think they may have been referring to air-con related issues when first released, not necessarily actual rain… not something I’ve ever experienced on Azumas though.
 

prj372

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2020
Messages
8
Location
Pontypridd
What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?

And when has an 8Xx Suffered from rain inside the train as that is not something I've heard about, seen, or read about?
I have a feeling perhaps that the rain comment refers to the 800's at Dawlish? Storm water being washed over the top of the trains and affecting roof mounted equipment?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
I think they may have been referring to air-con related issues when first released, not necessarily actual rain… not something I’ve ever experienced on Azumas though.
So one train, on introduction day for GWR. Hardly a failure.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I have a feeling perhaps that the rain comment refers to the 800's at Dawlish? Storm water being washed over the top of the trains and affecting roof mounted equipment?
The poster clearly states 'protect inside of the train from rain'.

Yet I'm not aware of any train getting a load of rain water dumped inside it.

Yes, as you write, they are affected by Dawlish at times and that is well documented.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,271
So one train, on introduction day for GWR. Hardly a failure.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


The poster clearly states 'protect inside of the train from rain'.

Yet I'm not aware of any train getting a load of rain water dumped inside it.

Yes, as you write, they are affected by Dawlish at times and that is well documented.
It was along time ago but the but I think the GWR launch train with some key people on it had leaking air handling units. There may well be an old Roger Ford or similar column featuring the shower.

Edit to add sky news article (the first item Google found) from 2017

 

Top