Why can’t we just have a yellow stripe?Attached picture below taken November 2024, shows '1' at each end of carriage.
Why can’t we just have a yellow stripe?Attached picture below taken November 2024, shows '1' at each end of carriage.
Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.Why can’t we just have a yellow stripe?
Just imagine the people who use more than one train operator. First class area is presented differently. You can see why British Rail had a standard. At least with Voyagers, a yellow bar on the coupling indicates the first class end . Of course, now Real Time Trains shows it too.Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.
That doesn't explain why it's yellow on the 222s (perhaps due to the white background), nor why it's not a Champagne stripe. Ultimately up to the Design Team providing it means any relevant legislation/guidelines.
I know someone internally pushed for a yellow stripe but it would seem that hasn't happened.
This is where designers need to be told to take their crayons elsewhere. It's change for the sake of change - it ought to be standardised identification. Hopefully GBR will sort out this out as part of a re-branding.Because that wouldn't be in keeping with the EMR Brand/Design Guidelines. The Champagne colour signifies First Class and has done for a few years on most touch points for EMR.
That doesn't explain why it's yellow on the 222s (perhaps due to the white background), nor why it's not a Champagne stripe. Ultimately up to the Design Team providing it means any relevant legislation/guidelines.
I know someone internally pushed for a yellow stripe but it would seem that hasn't happened.
Or certainly at the very least told when creating any new designs that there are already some industry standard guidelines that must be adhered to. This surely must already be the case for safety or accessibility related reasons, but it would be good if it extended to “norms” like easily identifiable First Class or bicycle carriages.This is where designers need to be told to take their crayons elsewhere. It's change for the sake of change - it ought to be standardised identification. Hopefully GBR will sort out this out as part of a re-branding.
It was a UIC thing. Shame it's been lost.A yellow stripe is often used to denote first class not only in this country but on the continent as well. EMR should stick with it.
Looks like a ten car test has just pulled into Derby. Will try and get a photo..
Looks like a ten car test has just pulled into Derby. Will try and get a photo..
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
810003 and 810004Realtime Trains | 5Q61 1050 Sheffield to St Pancras International | 08/09/2025
Real-time train running information for 5Q61 1050 departure from Sheffield to St Pancras International on 08/09/2025. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
This?
Can't tell you how many built, but units up to 810018 (excluding 002 & 017) all seen outside at Newton Aycliffe.Apologies if I missed it, but does anyone in here know how many of the 33 Class 810 units have been built?
harboroughfm.co.uk
East Midlands Railway’s fleet of Aurora Intercity trains were due start running this year, but will not enter service until sometime in 2026, after reportedly facing a series of teething problems during testing.
“We expect EMR to ensure that their new, modern intercity trains are introduced as quickly and smoothly as possible.
Regards getting the 810s into service, I can't see what the Dft can actually do to get them into service earlier.Can't even remember if this is supposed to be news or not, but it certainly won't surprise anybody here. Harborough MP (and given some of his statements, possible Rail UK Speculative Forum lurker) Neil O'Brien has had DfT apparently confirm that the 810 entry into service is now 2026.
Link is to Harborough FM news website
![]()
Concern Over Delay To Rollout Of New Trains
There are calls for the government in intervene over the delay in introducing new trains on the midland mainline. East Midlands Railway’s fleet of Aurora Intercity trains were due start running thi…harboroughfm.co.uk
DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.Regards getting the 810s into service, I can't see what the Dft can actually do to get them into service earlier.
Hitachi are the issue, for not building a train to the quality and standard required.
The faults have been discussed here many many times, none of which can be blamed (for once) at the dft.
If a builder comes to you and says they can build it, you trust them. Especially a Japanese company! Again, I can't see how that can be blamed by Dft.Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.
The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.
The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain?If a builder comes to you and says they can build it, you trust them. Especially a Japanese company! Again, I can't see how that can be blamed by Dft.
And. Actually was it not Abellio who ordered the train? So they selected the design etc?
So that was what was meant when we were told we'd get Japanese levels of reliability from them!The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain?
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.
The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.
Whilst DfT can't be blamed for the build quality, they have to take some blame for not understanding basic physics, and choosing the design.
The idea that it would be possible to knock 10% of the length of a vehicle with optimised distributed equipment and make all the equipment fit in and work properly should have caused a very high red flag in the risk analysis of DfT Dept reviewing the tenders.
What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?The same Japanese company with fleet wide solebar cracks, smashing repeatedly into bumpstops and the inability to protect the inside of a train from, well, rain
Thanks, so at least about 16 / half-ish then.Can't tell you how many built, but units up to 810018 (excluding 002 & 017) all seen outside at Newton Aycliffe.
It has been 2026 for at least a few months, but always good to have additional confirmation.Can't even remember if this is supposed to be news or not, but it certainly won't surprise anybody here. Harborough MP (and given some of his statements, possible Rail UK Speculative Forum lurker) Neil O'Brien has had DfT apparently confirm that the 810 entry into service is now 2026.
Link is to Harborough FM news website
![]()
Concern Over Delay To Rollout Of New Trains
There are calls for the government in intervene over the delay in introducing new trains on the midland mainline. East Midlands Railway’s fleet of Aurora Intercity trains were due start running thi…harboroughfm.co.uk
DfT language very much tries to distance itself from any accountability and place the onus squarely on EMR.
It doesn’t help matters that EMR have such abysmal comms. They’re always ‘approached for comment’ but either ignore or give one line responses. Where’s Will Rogers giving updates on this shambles? Wouldn’t get any of this from David Horne at LNER - they know how to do PR.
The Hitachi built bi-mode trains will transform the experience of customers as they travel on the Midland Main Line when introduced during 2025 and throughout 2026.
I think they may have been referring to air-con related issues when first released, not necessarily actual rain… not something I’ve ever experienced on Azumas though.What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?
And when has an 8Xx Suffered from rain inside the train as that is not something I've heard about, seen, or read about?
I have a feeling perhaps that the rain comment refers to the 800's at Dawlish? Storm water being washed over the top of the trains and affecting roof mounted equipment?What are you on about smashing into bumpstops? What does that mean?
And when has an 8Xx Suffered from rain inside the train as that is not something I've heard about, seen, or read about?
So one train, on introduction day for GWR. Hardly a failure.I think they may have been referring to air-con related issues when first released, not necessarily actual rain… not something I’ve ever experienced on Azumas though.
The poster clearly states 'protect inside of the train from rain'.I have a feeling perhaps that the rain comment refers to the 800's at Dawlish? Storm water being washed over the top of the trains and affecting roof mounted equipment?
It was along time ago but the but I think the GWR launch train with some key people on it had leaking air handling units. There may well be an old Roger Ford or similar column featuring the shower.So one train, on introduction day for GWR. Hardly a failure.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
The poster clearly states 'protect inside of the train from rain'.
Yet I'm not aware of any train getting a load of rain water dumped inside it.
Yes, as you write, they are affected by Dawlish at times and that is well documented.