• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway: progress updates

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,234
South Eastern Metro increases are not that substantial and across most - if not all - Metro lines are still someway below 2021 levels. Better than 2023 but that's a low bar.

SE are good at PR but the reality is lines are still pretty lacking and services will continue that way into 2025.
So they're not increasing services by the number they state from December, or restoring a minimum 4tph off-peak to all metro stations?

My point, which it seems I did not make clearly enough, is that SWR will have more than enough rolling stock to increase service levels at will and that a good starting point would be to increase service levels back to 4tph+ at all metro stations as South Eastern are doing from December (or maybe they're not doing if you're correct). As it stands the woeful 2tph at stations such as Mortlake, Brentford and Hounslow does nothing to stimulate passenger growth.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Olivine

Member
Joined
4 May 2023
Messages
137
Location
thatcham
So they're not increasing services by the number they state from December, or restoring a minimum 4tph off-peak to all metro stations?

My point, which it seems I did not make clearly enough, is that SWR will have more than enough rolling stock to increase service levels at will and that a good starting point would be to increase service levels back to 4tph+ at all metro stations as South Eastern are doing from December (or maybe they're not doing if you're correct). As it stands the woeful 2tph at stations such as Mortlake, Brentford and Hounslow does nothing to stimulate passenger growth.
You are absolutely right but it’s a moot point now as there is no incentive for any private operator to do anything except meet the minimum (arguably, always was with a management contract).

The naysayers will say TFL won’t take over services rapidly - there won’t be changes in the next three years to service levels but once TFL has a solid grip of demand they will promptly increase services as their mandate is to run a network for the benefit of the passengers, not deliver what D(a)FT wish them to do.

The opportunity for SE metro and GN Moorgate are again moot points; it’s all going to be government run so why would GBR desire to take control over something when their labour run GLA could take it over and run it better.

Mods do feel free to hive off to a new thread; we do like a good TFL running metro services chat and the situation has most certainly changed with GBR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,234
You are absolutely right but it’s a moot point now as there is no incentive for any private operator to do anything except meet the minimum (arguably, always was with a management contract).
My last word on the matter.

Agree with what you're saying, but of course SWR won't be a private operator from May.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,910
Location
London
Is Sunday part of the working week for SWR drivers, assuming the training starts on the 28th (tomorrow)?
 
Last edited:

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
6,228
Yes, but the course won't be starting on a Sunday. The trainers will mostly be working Monday to Friday for a start.
 

class701

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2024
Messages
51
Location
London
Surely a near 60% drop in train seats on SWR (and other) suburban lines since Covid should be illegal. We have seen four an hour reduced to two, plus ten-car reduced to eight. That is a huge drop and they cannot even run the remaining trains on time. SWR frequently cut ALL stations beyond Raynes Park to Waterloo. On Monday last week our train was 20+ late, so we ran fast to Waterloo. Then on the way home hours later, exactly the same thing happened again. We ran fast from Waterloo to Raynes Park. That for us was brilliant, but it does fudge the on-time figures big time.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
9,840
Location
Croydon
Surely a near 60% drop in train seats on SWR (and other) suburban lines since Covid should be illegal. We have seen four an hour reduced to two, plus ten-car reduced to eight. That is a huge drop and they cannot even run the remaining trains on time. SWR frequently cut ALL stations beyond Raynes Park to Waterloo. On Monday last week our train was 20+ late, so we ran fast to Waterloo. Then on the way home hours later, exactly the same thing happened again. We ran fast from Waterloo to Raynes Park. That for us was brilliant, but it does fudge the on-time figures big time.
I think SWR in particular has seen a quite drastic drop in passenger numbers and what is left might will be spread more into the off peak times. Generally it is easy to see a 40% drop as many people have only returned to the office on three out of five days per week. Others have not returned or are still working mostly from home. The vast majority of London based commuting is for office work and into Waterloo it tends to be for the type of office workers that are more likely to work from home.

It is discussed in more detail in other threads. The railways are missing a lot of lucrative annual season ticket revenue since Covid and not many people want to return to commuting really. It really is a dark time for the railways - very few using the railways to get to work ever wanted to have to use railways. The genie is out of the bottle and everyone knows home working is possible.

The loss of frequency is the worst part as that does damage attractiveness more than train capacity. But who is going to pay.

This is getting off topic so have a hunt around for the other threads.
 
Last edited:

NorthLondoner

Member
Joined
8 Jul 2021
Messages
28
Location
London
Unfortunately cuts and directivnese from the DfT has led to many operators to reduce services post-Covid. Regardless of service usage.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,317
Surely a near 60% drop in train seats on SWR (and other) suburban lines since Covid should be illegal. We have seen four an hour reduced to two, plus ten-car reduced to eight. That is a huge drop and they cannot even run the remaining trains on time. SWR frequently cut ALL stations beyond Raynes Park to Waterloo. On Monday last week our train was 20+ late, so we ran fast to Waterloo. Then on the way home hours later, exactly the same thing happened again. We ran fast from Waterloo to Raynes Park. That for us was brilliant, but it does fudge the on-time figures big time.
I thought it’s been explained that any skip stopping gets treated as a performance failure irrespective of the time being made up.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,845
Location
SW London
I thought it’s been explained that any skip stopping gets treated as a performance failure irrespective of the time being made up.
Nevertheless it does affect the figures as it means the train can take up its next service on time. This may - or may not - be helpful, depending on whether the people inconvienced by the skip stopping are outnumbered by the people benefitting from the resulting on time departure. (SWR love skip-stopping peak direction services to get a counter-peak service on time)
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,234
I'm aware. More so it mentioned 28th. Was wondering if it had actually began.

Best I believe to wait till the end of the week then :D
Post #9785 stated that it wouldn't be the 28th because that's a Sunday and the trainers work Mon-Fri.
 

DMckduck

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2020
Messages
488
So they're not increasing services by the number they state from December, or restoring a minimum 4tph off-peak to all metro stations?

My point, which it seems I did not make clearly enough, is that SWR will have more than enough rolling stock to increase service levels at will and that a good starting point would be to increase service levels back to 4tph+ at all metro stations as South Eastern are doing from December (or maybe they're not doing if you're correct). As it stands the woeful 2tph at stations such as Mortlake, Brentford and Hounslow does nothing to stimulate passenger growth.
SWR have struggled to recover establishment figures since the drop to a 37 hour week in December 2022. That is why a lot of disruption is spiraling out of control.

Plus they don't even have enough drivers to run the current timetable, nevermind the pre covid timetable.

I'm sure the data would suggest a lag in recruitment for both driver and guards compared with pre 2020.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
1,096
Location
Richmond
I think SWR in particular has seen a quite drastic drop in passenger numbers and what is left might will be spread more into the off peak times. Generally it is easy to see a 40% drop as many people have only returned to the office on three out of five days per week. Others have not returned or are still working mostly from home. The vast majority of London based commuting is for office work and into Waterloo it tends to be for the type of office workers that are more likely to work from home.
There goes any chance of ABDO ever being implemented beyond small portions of testing
 

lewisf

Member
Joined
21 Feb 2009
Messages
381
Location
Kingston/Surbiton
There goes any chance of ABDO ever being implemented beyond small portions of testing
I’d hope not. It’s not uncommon to be stuck at a red signal just outside a station during the morning peak (Wimbledon is especially bad) even with the reduced frequency. ABDO could be a real help still.
 

Nogoohwell

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2020
Messages
106
Location
London
I’d hope not. It’s not uncommon to be stuck at a red signal just outside a station during the morning peak (Wimbledon is especially bad) even with the reduced frequency. ABDO could be a real help still.
Congestion at Wimbledon would be solved if they put a second foot bridge at the London end of the station to link platform 5 with the tube. AND there is plenty of space to do that too.

Its such a simple solution to the overcrowding at the rear of the train, but thats another discussion.
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
1,022
Location
London
Congestion at Wimbledon would be solved if they put a second foot bridge at the London end of the station to link platform 5 with the tube. AND there is plenty of space to do that too.

Its such a simple solution to the overcrowding at the rear of the train, but thats another discussion.
At least once the 701s take over fully, it'll mean there will be less bunching at the 8th coach as people won't be running up the platform to the rear doors of said coach and will be able to use coach 9 + 10
 

janahan

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2014
Messages
135
At least once the 701s take over fully, it'll mean there will be less bunching at the 8th coach as people won't be running up the platform to the rear doors of said coach and will be able to use coach 9 + 10
Plus, much more easier to walk through the open carraiges. Dont underestimate this. I know many outside this forum and others "in the know" who probably used to conventions on the Tube, do not walk through doors on carraiges, but are more than happy to do so on the open Overground / Elizabeth line, and Sub Surface, irregardless of where they get on.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
1,096
Location
Richmond
GTzra7KXQAA340r.jpg

Filming going on unit 701042. My best guess is some sort of corporate driver training film - hopefully not the latest RED edition
 
Last edited:

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
13,234
Plus, much more easier to walk through the open carraiges. Dont underestimate this. I know many outside this forum and others "in the know" who probably used to conventions on the Tube, do not walk through doors on carraiges, but are more than happy to do so on the open Overground / Elizabeth line, and Sub Surface, irregardless of where they get on.
It's very noticeable at Richmond on the District line and Overground. Previously with the old stock there was the tendency for the rear couple of coaches to end up rammed. Nowadays there's a continual stream of passengers walking through, resulting in an even loading throughout the train.
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,741
701059
IMG_20240731_110233.jpg

701518/524
Terminated Worcester
 
Last edited:

mansonlo49

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2023
Messages
1,019
Location
uk

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,845
Location
SW London
At least once the 701s take over fully, it'll mean there will be less bunching at the 8th coach as people won't be running up the platform to the rear doors of said coach and will be able to use coach 9 + 10
Not just at Wimbledon, but at other stations where the entrance/exit is at the rear of the train and the 8-car stop boards have been removed. Kingston (down) and Raynes Park (both directions) for example. Also leads to more crowding in the rear cars of trains to those stations, as the regulars know that is the place to be to beat the scrum at the barriers - (as if crowding in the rear cars was not already an issue as people joining late at Waterloo dive for the closest door.)
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,051
Location
Surrey
I’d hope not. It’s not uncommon to be stuck at a red signal just outside a station during the morning peak (Wimbledon is especially bad) even with the reduced frequency. ABDO could be a real help still.
Indeed without DOO now its the next best thing to reduce dwell times
 

Top