DarloRich
Veteran Member
or, perhaps, not marketing diesels until you know which diesels are going to show up.....................Over to the ‘marketing diesels’ thread…..
or, perhaps, not marketing diesels until you know which diesels are going to show up.....................Over to the ‘marketing diesels’ thread…..
My bad - the gen is on the BLS page quoting those numbers and it still does todayIs that the private group that someone who is registered on Facebook has to request to join?
The official SVR website and the SVR’s public Facebook page still only have four confiremed. Over to the ‘marketing diesels’ thread…..
Haha Could any of the resident EE Type 4s living at Kidderminster be used as ETHELS ? (joke) IIRC 50035 and 50044 are still at Derby for attention and I think 50031 still needs an engine lift, but that would leave 50007 50033 and 50049 maybe ?I wonder if the train will be heated as there is only one ETH fitted 37 allocated - at the moment
Peter
It looks like a 37, but it doesn't sound like a 37!37901 now confirmed by the SVR.
It's no more a 37 than a 57 is a 47!It looks like a 37, but it doesn't sound like a 37!
Same corporate scheme, different sub-sector.Bring on 37688 in same livery ( l think)will be a great double header
Don't start that...It's no more a 37 than a 57 is a 47!![]()
Yes indeed - there's no consistency here. Why does a reengined 47 or 56 get a new classsification but not a re-engined 37.It's no more a 37 than a 57 is a 47!![]()
57 and 69 much later examples of reengined locos? 47901 was still classed as a 47 even though reengined, but think going off topic?Yes indeed - there's no consistency here. Why does a reengined 47 or 56 get a new classsification but not a re-engined 37.
I would say a better example is 69 vs 73/9. One given a new class, the other not.57 and 69 much later examples of reengined locos? 47901 was still classed as a 47 even though reengined, but think going off topic?
Don't forget 47046 in its later life as 601 and 901, just to add to that inconsistency you've rightly pointed out! Completely different engines but still allegedly a 47.......Yes indeed - there's no consistency here. Why does a reengined 47 or 56 get a new classsification but not a re-engined 37.
69s don't have pick up shoes for third rail working.I would say a better example is 69 vs 73/9. One given a new class, the other not.
But the 57s were before both HST MTU re-engining and Class 73/9 came versions, which retained the same class (and in some cases, no renumbering at all).57 and 69 much later examples of reengined locos?
The Class 47 aficionado crew were having this argument about 47901 nearly 40 years ago. And as one of them, yes, I did go and have it on a railtour ... some refused to count it as a 47 and didn't. We make our own choices.Don't start that...
There was a right kafuffull on a FB group earlier in the year arguing weather slug 1 is or isn't a 37. It was so funny to read some of the comments.
Just for the record, I'd have gone on the railtour without any qualms, but I don't consider it a 47. I didn't bash them because of what they looked like.....!The Class 47 aficionado crew were having this argument about 47901 nearly 40 years ago. And as one of them, yes, I did go and have it on a railtour ... some refused to count it as a 47 and didn't. We make our own choices.
No. it was purchased by the D05 Preservation group in 2017 from DRS.37688 has been confirmed by the SVR now. Did it used to be with Locomotive Services at Crewe?
My prayers answered together with 37901. But wasn't it lined up anyway despite being not officially announced.37688 added to the lineup.
No. it was purchased by the D05 Preservation group in 2017 from DRS.
When was that - the Class page has no mention if it. - See Status ChangesWhilst the latter statement is correct, it certainly was "with Locomotive Services at Crewe" for quite a while.
Have a look at the entries from 14/04/22 to 24/06/23 - lots of LSL operated charter trains. It remained on site at LSL Crewe until the beginning of June this year, but wasn't being used, hence the move to the NYMR, where it is now working regularly.