• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 365 scrap movements + preservation discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
520 is one of the final unit to do the last service on GN (alongside with 522 and 502)
Yep, as I mentioned on the previous page it was the leading unit on the final service into KGX.
 

Fuzzytop

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
306
506 and 536 tomorrow then?

Been said countless times, but it was a great shame the 365s didn't find extra work. It's strange to think that news broke only 12 months ago this week about the demise of the remaining GN fleet. There would be a certain irony if the speculative upcoming cascades leave GN short of units in the medium-term.
 

railfan100

On Moderation
Joined
31 Oct 2016
Messages
212
Location
London
Strange world when a unit that did not feel worn out at all meets it's end. Especially when other life expired units are running on the network using electric power. The 319 and 321 come to mind. It would be a shame if a number are not saved for preservation and given a long-term future
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
18,930
Location
Devon
Strange world when a unit that did not feel worn out at all meets it's end. Especially when other life expired units are running on the network using electric power. The 319 and 321 come to mind. It would be a shame if a number are not saved for preservation and given a long-term future

This subject has been covered many times and there are quite a few threads in the preservation section including this one if you want to look at some of the reasons. :)
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
Strange world when a unit that did not feel worn out at all meets it's end. Especially when other life expired units are running on the network using electric power. The 319 and 321 come to mind. It would be a shame if a number are not saved for preservation and given a long-term future
I think three carriages is very good going and certainly better than I was expecting (which was one driving motor at most).
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,279
STP 15/03 1145 Bicester MoD - Newport Docks
That’s going to upset people who were somehow convinced 525 had a future. I was never convinced it was to be an ’NR test train’, always far more likely it was just a ‘first of class’ trials fit for 365s…
 
Last edited:

DBS92042

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2019
Messages
1,798
Which means that 524 (DMOC A and TSO) and 540 (DMOC B) are the only one left in the UK (which I know they're in preservation at EKR)
506 & 536 live on as well (although probably very short term) as their moved to Newport on Friday was cancelled
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,486
Location
Taunton or Kent
Which means that 524 (DMOC A and TSO) and 540 (DMOC B) are the only one left in the UK (which I know they're in preservation at EKR)
Sorry to be pedantic, but unless the scrap remains being shipped abroad counts, "the only one left" would have sufficed.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
That’s going to upset people who were somehow convinced 525 had a future. I was never convinced it was to be an ’NR test train’, always far more likely it was just a ‘first of class’ trials fit for 365s…
I've pointed out that 525 was most likely retained until the commercial contracts with Alstom was resolved. After removing the 365s from the East Cost routes, there was never any need to continue with the ETCS programme.
 

YSTrains

On Moderation
Joined
13 Dec 2021
Messages
157
Location
London
May I ask, why did they specifically choose 2 carriages from 524 and 1 carriage from 540? Why these units?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,279
May I ask, why did they specifically choose 2 carriages from 524 and 1 carriage from 540? Why these units?
Probably because as there’s no intention to run them it doesn’t matter. In my opinion they don’t really count as “preserved”, because they‘ll never really be a functional EMU again…
 

aleggatta

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
565
May I ask, why did they specifically choose 2 carriages from 524 and 1 carriage from 540? Why these units?
By all accounts, I think it was supposed to be 524 only, but the scrap man was quick off the mark (they were taken by road from the scrap yard) and the rest of 524 started being processed before it could be removed.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,486
Location
Taunton or Kent
May I ask, why did they specifically choose 2 carriages from 524 and 1 carriage from 540? Why these units?
524 was deemed to be in the best condition, not sure about 540, although I think some rumours circulated about it being the last unit out of York.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,187
Probably because as there’s no intention to run them it doesn’t matter. In my opinion they don’t really count as “preserved”, because they‘ll never really be a functional EMU again…
At least they will end up more "preserved" than the three Class 332 carriages now located at Goole and not for public use.
 

ST156

Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
154
May I ask, why did they specifically choose 2 carriages from 524 and 1 carriage from 540? Why these units?
There is an article in the Railway Magazine this month which talks through the story in some detail.

As others have said, the original plan was to preserve 2 cars from 524, which then became 3 cars. They couldn't all be from the same unit due to the limited space at Newport for getting them onto a low loader - sounds like it just wasn't logistically feasible.

So they planned to get the second Driving Car from 530, but then on the day due to a fault with 530, 540 was sent in its place to Newport - so finally 2 cars ex 524 & 1 car ex 540.
 

milankow02

On Moderation
Joined
17 Oct 2021
Messages
35
Location
Hatfield, Hertfordshire
There is an article in the Railway Magazine this month which talks through the story in some detail.

As others have said, the original plan was to preserve 2 cars from 524, which then became 3 cars. They couldn't all be from the same unit due to the limited space at Newport for getting them onto a low loader - sounds like it just wasn't logistically feasible.

So they planned to get the second Driving Car from 530, but then on the day due to a fault with 530, 540 was sent in its place to Newport - so finally 2 cars ex 524 & 1 car ex 540.
and now, 530 went to scrap the following month
 

Fuzzytop

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2017
Messages
306
Oh; so East Kent Railway has received two driving cars?
Yep.

They’ve received:
65917 (driving motor ex 365524)
72287 (trailer ex 365524)
65974 (driving motor ex 365540)

Just missing a pantograph trailer, but as I understand it (and mentioned previously on this thread, I think) they only had space to take three cars.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top