-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Class 350 non-standard formations
- Thread starter buckett
- Start date
- Status
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
350233 certainly still has 61546 in its formation so yes.
The odd carriages in the three 350/1s (350103, 350105 and 350108) have also never been 'put right' either.
Thank you Jonathan, much appreciated
Italicised bold are in the wrong unit
350 | 103 | 63765 | 66813 | 66863 | 63713 |
350 | 105 | 63763 | 66815 | 66868 | 63715 |
350 | 108 | 63768 | 66818 | 66865 | 63718 |
350 | 233 | 61433 | 65233 | 67533 | 61546 |
350 | 246 | 61446 | 65246 | 67546 | 61564 |
350 | 264 | 61464 | 65264 | 67564 | 61533 |
Thank you D6975, that's great - hadn't realised there are switches with some 350/1 units too
DarloRich
Veteran Member
i have never noticed! does this impact on capacity on any way?
MP393
Member
They’re all like-for-like carriages, so shouldn’t do. Just from different original sets!
DarloRich
Veteran Member
got you - thanks!
Watford tunnel incident and a derailment at Liverpool South Parkway for the three 350/2s https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...y-refurb-questions.210538/page-5#post-5150092
The three 350/1s have been misformed basically since new 17 years ago.
Last edited:
43096
On Moderation
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 18,748
I think as a result of some sort of incident during initial testing - tree-related, I think - that saw some vehicles sent back to Germany for repair.
- Status