PHILIPE
Veteran Member
I started reading the post and it looked interesting so I put my thoughts across...I may not have mentioned a 150 but it is regarding traction on the Settle to Carlisle.
Don't worry. It drifted off topic quite a few posts ago.
I started reading the post and it looked interesting so I put my thoughts across...I may not have mentioned a 150 but it is regarding traction on the Settle to Carlisle.
I don't get your point. That surely is true for all rail vehicles
Its also another reason why Northern and TPE shouldn't be ever merged despite that as a suggestion by at least 1 frequent poster on here.
Possibly but would be getting IC class trains on TPE if they had remained part of Northern I seriously doubt it, and I come from the era of BR subbing a Railbus on TPE Hull workings quite frequently.
When TPE was part of Arriva Trains Northern (first time around) you never saw anything other than a 158 on a TPE service unless the alternative would be cancellation, and that's despite the rest of the network essentially operating a random unit generator.
Depends what you mean by "IC class". If this is about door positions, thirds probably does suit TPE better than end doors due to the mixed traffic. If they'd been part of Northern I'd expect there would have been a much larger Class 195 order, which would have been just fine.
Surely the biggest reason for TPE's 185s not being Intercity is they have a top speed which is on a par with a modern local/regional train, not on a par with a modern Intercity train.
Then the LHCS isn't InterCity either.