I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation!May I respectfully suggest you read the whole original article ?
I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation!May I respectfully suggest you read the whole original article ?
May I respectfully suggest you read the whole original article ?
I did, but the fact remains that for a lot of people it's a half-day excursion. Reflects the statistic quoted by the National Park that half the population of England are within an hour's travel of the Peak District, or something like that.I agree wholeheartedly with your recommendation!
The Telegraph lists the Churnet Valley Railway as one of the most magnificent rail journeys you can do in a day.
If you look at the attachments Network Rail have already objected, with access being one of the issues
Looks like from SOT the 25 to Hanley then 16 to Station Road Cheddleton and a walk along the canal to Cheddleton station is a good option Monday to Saturday. Has anyone done this route recently?That's what Traveline suggests too. I like https://www.traveline.info/ because you can just give it an origin like [SOT] and a destination postcode and it covers almost all the conceivable options. You can tell it how far you are prepared to walk, too. When there are lots of bus routes you could use it's very useful, especially in a city you don't know.
Visit Kingsnorth (just outside Ashford) in Kent to see that being on a flood plain makes absolutely no difference to planners or developers. If any problems arise, the developers refer homeowners foolish enough to buy properties in such locations to the builders, the builders refer them back and the homeowner spends several years and a lot of angst trying to get someone - anyone - to provide a resolution.Judging by the fact that the developer doesnt appear to own half the land and also that it on a flood plain, I cant see it getting approval anyway.
I had to smile at such a buyer on the TV complaining bitterly at his predicament.Visit Kingsnorth (just outside Ashford) in Kent to see that being on a flood plain makes absolutely no difference to planners or developers. If any problems arise, the developers refer homeowners foolish enough to buy properties in such locations to the builders, the builders refer them back and the homeowner spends several years and a lot of angst trying to get someone - anyone - to provide a resolution.
And there seems to be no shortage of buyers, who don't appear to notice that their nice, shiny new development is even on a flood plain... then wonder why a few years later their carpets have been ruined.
Land ownership is irrelevant when it comes to planning permission.Judging by the fact that the developer doesnt appear to own half the land and also that it on a flood plain, I cant see it getting approval anyway.
Looks like from SOT the 25 to Hanley then 16 to Station Road Cheddleton and a walk along the canal to Cheddleton station is a good option Monday to Saturday. Has anyone done this route recently?
thanks vlad. just "walked" the A52 on street view from Kingsley to the Railway and the section without a footpath doesn't look good to me at all. although its only 200-250m? Not as steep as the route from Haworth station to The ParsonageThat's the least attractive part of the Caldon Canal outside Stoke-on-Trent - it passes an industrial estate for pretty much the entire length. It's straightforward to follow, though.
Note that there are lots of different buses that run between Stoke station and Hanley, not just the 25. If you get a D&G service (2, 9, 14; there may be others) then you could get a network ticket rather than paying twice. However, it's under 20 minutes' walk so if you're mobile that's also an option.
If travelling by bus I find getting the 32 to Kingsley then walking down to the station is more attractive - but bear in mind it's pretty steep and uphill on the way back!
Hence the current issues over the proposed freight terminal at St Albans.Land ownership is irrelevant when it comes to planning permission.
Anyone can seek planning permission for any land. Applicants do have to notify the owner, but not owning the land isn't a bar to receiving permission.
Land ownership is irrelevant when it comes to planning permission.
Anyone can seek planning permission for any land. Applicants do have to notify the owner, but not owning the land isn't a bar to receiving permission.
I think this case is slightly different, in that the land in question is currently owned by the County Council, who have a legal duty to their taxpayers, so they must consider purchase options on their (actually the taxpayers) land/property. As far as I am aware, this does not apply to NR.Hence the current issues over the proposed freight terminal at St Albans.
Yes...they did so yesterday and I was on it.Do they still sometimes run trains towards Ipstones/Cauldon Lowe?
Just... mind boggling. I often get called 'misanthropic' for voicing that I never underestimate the ability of homo sapiens to be profoundly stupid. But really, how much more obvious could the example you've quoted be?I had to smile at such a buyer on the TV complaining bitterly at his predicament.
The name of the new street he lived on? "Water Meadows"!
Years in retail and as a retained firefighter gave me very many occasions to doubt some peoples intelligence. I wondered, in many cases, how they ever managed to get to an adult age - maybe they had a lot of help? Worse still was the recognition that a) these people could vote in elections and more seriously they were liable to be called for jury service.Just... mind boggling. I often get called 'misanthropic' for voicing that I never underestimate the ability of homo sapiens to be profoundly stupid. But really, how much more obvious could the example you've quoted be?![]()