• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Carmont (near Stonehaven) derailment - 12 August 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
Especially to do so would leave no Guard with the passengers, which is a big no-no.*

*unless there was another Guard on the train who was fit and competent to assist.

The rule book does include circumstances where the Guard can be in the cab to assist the Driver.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,114
Location
Redcar
ASLEF have released the following:

Tribute Paid to Brett McCullough
12 August 2020

Kevin Lindsay, ASLEF’s organiser in Scotland, today paid tribute to Brett McCullough, the train driver who died in the rail crash at Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire, yesterday [Wednesday 12 August].



He said: ‘The tragic accident at Stonehaven has affected everyone in the railway family, but especially the family and friends of the three people who died, and the six people who were injured.’



Brett McCullough, 45, who was married with three children, and worked out of Aberdeen depot, lived not far from the scene of yesterday’s crash.



‘Brett was originally from Bromley, in Kent, but moved to Aberdeenshire to marry Stephanie. He worked as a gas fitter up here, and was servicing the boiler of an Aberdeen train driver in 2011 when they started to talk about the railway, and about driving trains.



‘Brett was fascinated by what he heard, successfully applied for a job, did his driver’s training for a year to earn his key, and entered service with ScotRail in December 2013.



‘He was a dedicated train driver, who loved his job, and was very popular at the depot with his colleagues. He was also a devoted family man who loved his wife and children – two girls and a boy. Brett thought the world of his family, and we all thought the world of him.’



Kevin added: ‘As train drivers our thoughts are not only with Brett’s family, but also with the family and friends of the conductor who died, Donald Dinnie, and the passenger on the 6.38 service out of Aberdeen. Our thoughts and prayers are with all those who were injured and taken to hospital.’



STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE FAMILY:

‘Words cannot describe the utterly devastating effect of Brett’s death on his family and friends. We have lost a wonderful husband, father, and son in the most awful of circumstances. Brett was the most decent and loving human being we have ever known and his passing leaves a huge void in all our lives.



‘We would like to thank the emergency services for their heroic efforts in helping everyone affected by this tragedy and for all the messages of support and condolence we have received. We are an extremely private family and ask that we are allowed to grieve without intrusion and hope that members of the press will understand our need to be left in peace at this time.’

 

simon_t123

New Member
Joined
13 Aug 2020
Messages
2
Location
Essex, UK
https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp...-scale-of-devastation-stonehaven-train-crash/

Was searching for any new or alternative video footage from around the incident area, found the above on one of the local papers websites of what claims to be new drone footage, perhaps alternative footage from the day but what's interesting at the far left of shot at the very start is what looks like a form of landslide ?

I could imagine heavy rains to gush downwards and create what looks like a gully heading down towards the river. Whether the landslide was there before or after the incident can't be proven from this footage alone, but tracing scars in in the ground from that point and to the start of the bridge is it at all possible the leading PC could of derailed and jumped across the river so to speak heading off track at the side / start of the bridge ?

The rear PC powers at the same rate as the front in an HST I believe so would likely of driven onwards momentarily pushing the stock in front of it to the eventual resting places.

It's provoking a lot of thought and interest which is healthy, I hope the resulting enquiry finds all it needs to reflect on the events as they were and reaches some form of conclusion.

A truly devastating, sad incident, thoughts with all those involved or connected.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Swanny200

Member
Joined
18 Sep 2010
Messages
680
Especially to do so would leave no Guard with the passengers, which is a big no-no.*

*unless there was another Guard on the train who was fit and competent to assist.
It has been stated that the person who went to the signal box was an off duty conductor, my initial mention in regards the driver and guard was that those two fatalities were announced pretty much straight away which made me think that possibly the guard was acting as a lookout for the driver in the cab and that maybe the off duty conductor would be deemed fit and competent to assist.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
I must say the response message from the Netherlands is very decent of them, for what it’s worth. The railway family extends well beyond our national borders.

I worked for London Underground at the time of the 7/7 bombings, and not long afterwards a massive card appeared in the lobby of 55 Broadway signed by dozens of employees of the New York Subway. It was hugely moving.
 

hst43102

Member
Joined
28 May 2019
Messages
974
Location
Tyneside
Nearly everything in the engine room is extremely solidly attached to the loco. If the collision is bad enough to cause it to move you're probably a goner anyway. Far better in there.
The driver will move! I don't know about you, but I'd prefer not to have my head thrown against the engine block...
 

Banana

Member
Joined
17 Jun 2016
Messages
48
Yes, looks much clearer what happened now. Smoking gun of the landslip just before a bridge that is missing its parapet.

Unfortunate set of circumstances and difficult to predict.

I suspect you will find 100s of similar stretches of line in the UK.
 

Swanny200

Member
Joined
18 Sep 2010
Messages
680
Yes, looks much clearer what happened now. Smoking gun of the landslip just before a bridge that is missing its parapet.

Unfortunate set of circumstances and difficult to predict.

I suspect you will find 100s of similar stretches of line in the UK.
You only have to look further down the country at Polmont and what the storm has done there, to bring the rails to a halt, can't imagine what damage that amount of water will do beneath the track there.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,191
Location
0035
https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp...-scale-of-devastation-stonehaven-train-crash/

Was searching for any new or alternative video footage from around the incident area, found the above on one of the local papers websites of what claims to be new drone footage, perhaps alternative footage from the day but what's interesting at the far left of shot at the very start is what looks like a form of landslide ? I could imagine heavy rains to gush downwards and create what looks like a gully heading down towards the river. Whether the landslide was there before or after the incident can't be proven from this footage alone, but tracing scars in in the ground from that point and to the start of the bridge is it at all possible the leading PC could of derailed and jumped across the river so to speak heading off track at the side / start of the bridge ? The rear PC powers at the same rate as the front in an HST I believe so would likely of driven onwards momentarily pushing the stock in front of it to the eventual resting places.
This video was shared and discussed further up thread.
 

CC 72100

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2012
Messages
3,851
The rule book does include circumstances where the Guard can be in the cab to assist the Driver.

I'm well aware, but individual TOC policies may restrict this depending on formation if it meant nobody with the passengers (as is the case on a HST).
 

fruitmachine

New Member
Joined
13 Aug 2020
Messages
1
Location
Edinburgh
New aerial footage was shown on Reporting Scotland. It looks like the parapet on the up-line side of the bridge is missing many but not all of the coping stones, but no more than that.
You can see at the Left where they are still present.
1597343313047.png
 

tiptoptaff

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2013
Messages
3,227
I'm well aware, but individual TOC policies may restrict this depending on formation if it meant nobody with the passengers (as is the case on a HST).

Indeed - in this situation, where, by all accounts it seems as though the area had been transited by this train and a train in the other direction, and the weather and light conditions were improving, that it's highly unlikely that the guard was in the cab
 

ossy5190

Member
Joined
23 Nov 2009
Messages
9
In this BBC article there is a picture of the crushed coach lying across the tracks with the letter D clearly displayed beside the door. If the train was in the correct formation then surley this should have been the lead coach?

 

tiptoptaff

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2013
Messages
3,227
In this BBC article there is a picture of the crushed coach lying across the tracks with the letter D clearly displayed beside the door. If the train was in the correct formation then surley this should have been the lead coach?

If you combine that photo with the aerial footage, D looks to be the one that's down the embankment
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,924
i imagine that asking the guard to be a second pair of eyes is a very sensible thing to do and would say that is almost certainly what happened.

I disagree. My first reaction was "the carriage with the guard's office seems to be the least damaged of the lot, what on earth happened?"

My partner, who like me is also a guard, summed up what to me, considering all that has been said about Donald Dinnie by his colleagues and also his regular passengers, is the likeliest thing to have happened: severe service disruption, with the train heading back to where it came from - what would a good guard be doing COVID or no COVID? What would we do? He would most likely have been in the train, talking to his passengers, reassuring them and keeping them up to date with what was going on.

I think you should consider that avenue before the far less likely one that he was on the foot plate.
 

the sniper

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2007
Messages
3,498
I disagree. My first reaction was "the carriage with the guard's office seems to be the least damaged of the lot, what on earth happened?"

When I initially saw that carriage at the back, I hoped that they'd have been in there.

Equally, I'd guess that carriage is where the member of staff who was travelling pass/off duty (and seemingly went to the signal box) was located, luckily.
 

Arrpi87

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2018
Messages
53
Thinking about how most of the passengers seemed to get away with much more minor injuries, this may be linked to the reversal of the train back towards it's origin station.

When you get on a train, most people will probably sit facing the direction of travel, so when the train was reversed many of the passengers were probably now facing 'backwards', therefore allowing their seat to take a lot of the impact forces instead of flying forward over tables and into the seats in front.
 
Last edited:

Tom Quinne

On Moderation
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
2,225
Just seen the Telegraph reporting that an off duty conductor travelling on the train raised the alarm by walking to the signal box

Its behind a pay wall so here goes....

What an extraordinary sense of duty the guard had, after all the horror he or she reverted to Railway 101 protect the line.

My thoughts go out to all those involved, crew, passengers, first responders and those often forgot about the signallers, moms and controllers.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,114
Location
Redcar
Good evening everyone,

I'm going to ask that we leave the police discussion from here on out. The relevant information has been posted we don't need to go any further into it at this stage. If there are more general queries about jurisdiction then they would be suitable in a new thread.

I think it's probably also time to draw a line under the discussion regarding where to go or where a driver might go during an accident. I think it's been covered enough and don't think we need to dwell on it further.

Many thanks to all for your contributions and for the most point treading the lines we've been asking you to so well.

Thanks,

ainsworth74
 

92002

Established Member
Joined
27 Mar 2014
Messages
1,260
Location
Clydebank
When I initially saw that carriage at the back, I hoped that they'd have been in there.

Equally, I'd guess that carriage is where the member of staff who was travelling pass/off duty (and seemingly went to the signal box) was located, luckily.
The carriage with the guards office is the first class and buffet area. So probably where the other conductor would be.
 

cockneyviking

Member
Joined
22 Jun 2015
Messages
295
A terrible accident, too early to speculate, let the authorities deal with the case, as a driver my heart goes out to the train crew, I've added to the 1T08 GoFundMe page,
 

MadMac

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2008
Messages
1,501
Location
Moorpark, CA
Daft as it may seem, signallers have had their PTS's withdrawn so therefore aren't allowed to go onto the track to secure the points or do anything else. the reversal wasn't an emergency so the procedure would be to wait for a MOM to arrive. I'm not saying that in this instance that was done, or indeed if in the more remote areas of the country the signallers have kept their PTS, but I was told this by a signaller that retired a few years ago.

Trailing crossover in the middle of nowhere probably wouldn’t have facing point locks and therefore need to be secured for movement of a passenger train. I’m thinking that after the train initially encountered the obstruction on the way south, there would have been various discussions with the TOC and NR to decide what to do, possibly even sending someone to see if the obstruction can be cleared within a reasonable timeframe. It’s not outwith the bounds of possibility that the train sat for a couple of hours while decisions were being made.
 

Banana

Member
Joined
17 Jun 2016
Messages
48
Why would you need a "second pair of eyes" in the driver's cab for? There's only so much area that's going to be important - and it's directly in front of you. It's not like an aircraft where a threat could come from any dimension.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top