• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,813
It certainly did when I first used the FW sleeper in 1980, (a convoluted operation involving one loco from Mossend to Cowlairs, a second down the bank into Queen Street, and a third to take it out again)
But the northbound was nevertheless there some time after the southbound had left for London.

How did the shunt work? Southbound was the ETHEL left on the back when the train went back up to Cowlairs?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

skyetraveller

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
41
How did the shunt work? Southbound was the ETHEL left on the back when the train went back up to Cowlairs?
My recollection (and its a long time ago now!) is that the 37 + ETHEL that brought the train into Queen Street from Fort William stayed attached to the rear up to Cowlairs where the other end loco was detached and the 37 + ETHEL then took the train round to Mossend. The reverse applied for the northbound. The 37 and ETHEL were swapped around during the wait between southbound and northbound at Mossend.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,796
Location
SW London
How did the shunt work? Southbound was the ETHEL left on the back when the train went back up to Cowlairs?
No ETHEL in 1980 (mark 1 days). From memory a 27 took over at Mossend and took us to the too of Cowlairs, where another 27 coupled on at the rear to take us down the bank to Queen Street. Some shunting there to release the second 27 and put us on top of the Mallaig portion.

I dont now recall whether the 27 that took over at Mossend was the same one that took us on to FtWm. But I do recall that shortly before that, there had been an accident when the loco that had taken the train from Mossend to Cowlairs was detached there, followed the train down the bank but had a brake failure (only evident when running light) and ran away, hitting the train in the platform. As it was a class 40 on that occasion, I assume it had not been the intention to use the same loco over the West Highland Line!
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,533
As a teenager in the late 90s I used to watch the sleeper leaving Inverness. There were still motorail vans then, which would be in the loading siding alongside platform 1. The pair of 37s would back onto the motorail vans, take them out and then propel back onto the sleeper stock sitting in p1. This formed a pretty long consist which I think left the locos sitting well beyond the end of the platform. I don't recall the generator van but that's probably because I didn't really know what I was looking at. Assume it would have been coupled with the sleeper stock rather than the motorail vans?

I also seem to recall there was one or two "ethel" locos parked up just outside the main depot building, adjacent to the end of platform 1/2. Presumably they were left over from the previous phase of operations & disused by that point.

(NB all the above is according to my memory which may well not turn out to be accurate!)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It was only later (early 1990s?) that the three BGs were converted into generator vans, when the Inverness and Aberdeen sleepers went over to pairs of no-heat 37s.
Do you know why they switched to no-heat 37s when 37/4s and 47/4s already existed? A shortage of locos? Seems quite a project to build 3 generator vans when you have traction that can do the job.
 
Last edited:

Steve Harris

Established Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
1,201
Location
ECML
As a teenager in the late 90s I used to watch the sleeper leaving Inverness. There were still motorail vans then, which would be in the loading siding alongside platform 1. The pair of 37s would back onto the motorail vans, take them out and then propel back onto the sleeper stock sitting in p1. This formed a pretty long consist which I think left the locos sitting well beyond the end of the platform. I don't recall the generator van but that's probably because I didn't really know what I was looking at. Assume it would have been coupled with the sleeper stock rather than the motorail vans?


(NB all the above is according to my memory which may well not turn out to be accurate!)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I totally agree with what you have written about from whenever I've visited Inverness and left on the sleeper it's always departed from Platform 2 (even when it had motorail vans in the consist). In fact there is a video on YouTube showing the sleeper with motorail vans and the loco's hanging off the end of platform 2.
 

35B

Established Member
Joined
19 Dec 2011
Messages
5,538
As a teenager in the late 90s I used to watch the sleeper leaving Inverness. There were still motorail vans then, which would be in the loading siding alongside platform 1. The pair of 37s would back onto the motorail vans, take them out and then propel back onto the sleeper stock sitting in p1. This formed a pretty long consist which I think left the locos sitting well beyond the end of the platform. I don't recall the generator van but that's probably because I didn't really know what I was looking at. Assume it would have been coupled with the sleeper stock rather than the motorail vans?

I also seem to recall there was one or two "ethel" locos parked up just outside the main depot building, adjacent to the end of platform 1/2. Presumably they were left over from the previous phase of operations & disused by that point.

(NB all the above is according to my memory which may well not turn out to be accurate!)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Do you know why they switched to no-heat 37s when 37/4s and 47/4s already existed? A shortage of locos? Seems quite a project to build 3 generator vans when you have traction that can do the job.
A couple of observations from my trips to Inverness in the early-mid 1990s.

Use of 37s. The 37/4s have very restricted train supply capability, while the class as a whole was still in regular use in Scotland in a way that 47s weren't following sprinterisation. A pair of 37s also give more power than a 47, especially if they're not losing traction power by running ETS.

Generator Vans. These were surplus Mk1 parcels vehicles, with a small engine in. A previous design was in use for steam tours, so the cost was relatively low

ETHELs. By my first visit to Inverness (1991), the ETHELs were long gone. However, the (not entirely dissimilar) class 26s were still in use and to be seen around Inverness.
 

Top