D6130
Established Member
....but they will still have to keep and maintain most of the old station as it's a listed building.Due to be moving to a new location as part of the re-design and electrification shortly. More fit for pupose.
....but they will still have to keep and maintain most of the old station as it's a listed building.Due to be moving to a new location as part of the re-design and electrification shortly. More fit for pupose.
Who knows they could sell it on to the hotel and move away.....but they will still have to keep and maintain most of the old station as it's a listed building.
Whilst in railways operational terms moving to the south would make sense, to my mind that is further from the City (depending on what is regarded as the City - I would suggest the commercial area) albeit closer to some residential areas but further from others. I had heard a bit ago the New Yard idea had been dropped, but maybe it has been resurrected, and it would be a good spacious location for servicing trains.Expected to be South of the current location. Which they think is closer to the City. No planning application yet. However the depot at the North end is due to move to the New Yard.
Nope, that’s further away from the city. You would need to move the station further east to be closer to the city, but that won’t happen.Who knows they could sell it on to the hotel and move away.
Expected to be South of the current location. Which they think is closer to the City. No planning application yet. However the depot at the North end is due to move to the New Yard.
Maybe back in the day was it a major junction for trains going up the Highlands/Grampians (Inverness and Aberdeen) and down towards the Lowlands (Glasgow and Edinburgh), before the Forth and Tay bridges were built. Hence why it was quite a large station in its pomp?I was decanted from CS to Aberdeen at Perth at 6am during the summer due to staff shortages (all advised in advance). We missed the Scotrail connection so had a bit of time in Perth station. I was surprised and impressed by its size, and obvious past grandeur for a relatively small city.
Even after the Forth and Tay Bridges were built. Look up the "Race to the North".Maybe back in the day was it a major junction for trains going up the Highlands/Grampians (Inverness and Aberdeen) and down towards the Lowlands (Glasgow and Edinburgh), before the Forth and Tay bridges were built.
Even after the Forth and Tay Bridges were built. Look up the "Race to the North".
Yup. Kinnaber Junction was the key point. Though this is probably drifting off topic for the Sleeper thread.Was that when both the former LNWR/Caledonian (London Euston) and the LNER (London Kings Cross) had trains to Aberdeen departing at broadly the same time, with whoever was the first to reach Laurencekirk declared the winner?

I suspect the service that gets sacrificed, where necessary, depends on the relative loadings. Fort William demand is much more heavily seasonal than any of the other Highlander routes, so at this time of year I wouldn’t be surprised if the Aberdeen isn’t more well patronised.Back on thread, no Fort William again this morning! Is Fort William the new Aberdeen? , as in sacrificial lamb in times of trouble .
Haven't been on the sleeper since I retired 3 years ago but then you'd expect loadings of around 6 to 12 on the Fort William other than Friday and Sunday nights in November this is berths plus seats.
Sleeper was 2E at Pitlochry. So not it today. Current approaching Aviemore.I have just walked past Pitlochry Station (0725). There are two coaches waiting outside the station. Has the Inverness portion gone pear shaped this morning?
I'm only guessing but could possibly be cover for the Fort William portion, which ran ECS this morning.I have just walked past Pitlochry Station (0725). There are two coaches waiting outside the station. Has the Inverness portion gone pear shaped this morning?
Off topic, but just to correct a point - when the Aberdeen races took place in 1895, prompted by the opening of the Forth Bridge which finally made the East Coast route competitive, the LNER was still nearly thirty years in the future. The East Coast partners were the Great Northern, North Eastern, and North British railways.Was that when both the former LNWR/Caledonian (London Euston) and the LNER (London Kings Cross) had trains to Aberdeen departing at broadly the same time, with whoever was the first to reach Laurencekirk declared the winner?
A local bus and taxi company, Elizabeth Yule Transport, garage is at the north end of the approach road to Pitlochry station. Probably the buses you saw were moved out of their yard in to the satiation approach road to make room in their yard or garage.I'm only guessing but could possibly be cover for the Fort William portion, which ran ECS this morning.
It's a much more complex operation than most other TOCs. The likes of LNER just run fixed formation trains up and down the ECML, no joining, splitting, changing locos, etc*. CS on the other hand have to handle multiple splits and joins daily with several different loco types. Not to mention that that the Highland Sleeper north of Edinburgh runs along some of the most remote single-track railway in the UK. All it takes is one loco that's feeling a little grumpy or one set of points that doesn't feel like moving and the whole night's operation is thrown into chaos.Why does the Caledonian sleeper fail so often?
It's a much more complex operation than most other TOCs. The likes of LNER just run fixed formation trains up and down the ECML, no joining, splitting, changing locos, etc*. CS on the other hand have to handle multiple splits and joins daily with several different loco types. Not to mention that that the Highland Sleeper north of Edinburgh runs along some of the most remote single-track railway in the UK. All it takes is one loco that's feeling a little grumpy or one set of points that doesn't feel like moving and the whole night's operation is thrown into chaos.
*Hyperbole for effect!
The Class 73s were extensively rebuilt about 5 (?) years ago so are basically new.Interesting I assume these trains a running with new rollingstock but 50 plus year old diesel locomotives.
As you say, they used to be very common. What was also more common was standby locomotive and spare carriages in sidings. So while failures are likely no more common than they were historically, they are more likely to have major knock-on effects.Is the sleeper more or less reliable than sleeper operations of the past? I was under the impression splitting/joining of trains and lcoo changes used to be commonplace across the network.
Very few sidings now!As you say, they used to be very common. What was also more common was standby locomotive and spare carriages in sidings. So while failures are likely no more common than they were historically, they are more likely to have major knock-on effects.