JohnMcL7
Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2018
- Messages
- 1,048
Posts elsewhere suggest it was 4S47 that failed rather than 4S49. 1S25 was looped to allow 4S49 to potentially assist in rear but a 66 was sent from Mossend to assist from the front. Would have thought a 92 would have made the perfect assisting loco, but I guess there’s a desire to avoid that with passengers on. It would also have had an awkward set-back move at Carstairs presumably too
Sorry, I'm not familiar with the codes - which service is 4S47?