An alternative to knocking down and rebuilding bridges, or track lowering, has been trialled. If it works then the time the lines need to be closed is much reduced so a cost reduction thanks to the rail lines remaining open much longer. It would be interesting to know the cost implications for the bridge itself when not counting the cost of closing the lines.
http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/.../view/bridge-lift-to-increase-clearances.html
some quotes from the article:
http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/.../view/bridge-lift-to-increase-clearances.html
some quotes from the article:
The ElevArch technique has been developed by Freyssinet under the RSSB-sponsored Avoidance of Bridge Reconstruction competition. This was launched in 2014 to find cost-effective ways of increasing clearances under fixed structures to accommodate overhead electrification. According to the safety and standards body, around 500 masonry arch bridges in the UK need to be raised or rebuilt as part of Network Rails electrification programme.
....
The patented technique involves cutting the arch free from its abutments and wing walls so it can be jacked up to increase clearances. According to Freyssinet, the sequence of operations is key to maintaining the all-important thrust line. A horizontal saw cut is made through each abutment, just below the arch springing, and five holes cored horizontally into each abutment. Vertical lifting jacks are inserted into the holes to support the weight of the bridge.
.....
Whereas a full bridge reconstruction or track lowering can require the railway to be closed for several days, Freyssinet believes that ElevArch could reduce this to a matter of hours, with many of the preparatory and completion tasks taking place behind protective barriers while the line is operational.