Pnerick81
Member
Quite a few bleak stations on the east lancs line in my opinion. Mill Hill , rose grove and nelson really do seem not to have had any form of maintenance over the last 30 years . Church and ozzy aswell .
I don't have my copy of "London's North Western Electrics" to hand but I'm fairly sure the stations north of Queens Park were built by the main line company of the period, not LER or LT.Carpender's Park (despite the station itself being a fairly nice example of classic London Underground* Art Deco architecture) used to be a bit bleak too, a 1960s concrete parade of shops and some flats, but it's been transformed recently into something rather nicer.
* I know it's now a LO station, but it is in LU style, and as LU I think used to extend to Watford I suspect it was built as a Tube station.
I used Patchway for the first time the other day. I was the only person getting off the train and the station feels very out on a limb, with the views of industrial land from the footbridge and apparently nothing else in the vicinity.I use Patchway from time to time. Has some minor interest with RR next door but always find it spooky and depressing. Especially in the dark and damp.
Yeah, I lost my bearings there once. Could have been worse.It's fine now, but the thread made me think about Rugby station in the 1990s when the platform buildings looked like a dilapidated ball-bearings factory...
Just took a look on google maps, and you’re not exaggerating!Longton station
I propose Longton station on the Crewe-Derby line as a strong contender for Bleakest station. The station itself is quite bleak, and the surroundings are also very miserable.
It sits on a viaduct above the remains of the ailing town centre. The platform-level station buildings have been demolished, and the platforms blocked off part way along, making them too short for the occasional 4-car 158 or 170 services along the line (these only ever appear on quiet services, for reasons best known to EMR). Beyond the fences, the platforms are covered in brambles and litter. The station's elevated position means it is usually very windy, with just a small bus shelter on each platform for protection. At night, the lighting is quite ineffective. On the platforms, you feel simultaneously very exposed, yet also trapped. Platforms are accessed via dingy staircases, which loop back in on themselves, so you can't see the bottom of the staircase from the street, or from the platform, making them feel quite secluded and threatening. There are no lifts to platform level. Services are hourly, making it quite useless for local travel.
From the platforms, the view is spectacular. On one side, the decaying remains of the phoenix pottery works, a small patch of wasteland serving as a car park, a closed-down adult entertainment shop (good for catching things other than trains), a fire-gutted house, one of the worst-rated hotels in the country, and an empty churchyard (church long since demolished). On the other, the back of a Tesco Extra, an overgrown part-demolished bus station, a car wash run from a shipping container, a collapsing row of empty shops, the faded grandeur of the old town hall, and a very busy road junction. You will often find a group of addicts lurking under the bridge, or occasionally sleeping under the stairs to the platforms.
Positives: volunteers clean the station and tend to some flower boxes (many thanks for your efforts). These don't do much for the overall ambiance, especially at this time of year when everything is dead. There's some fading artwork on the viaduct walls. The in-use parts of the platforms are usually kept free of litter. Heading east from the station, the line crosses a fairly interesting old bridge.
I propose Longton station on the Crewe-Derby line as a strong contender for Bleakest station. The station itself is quite bleak, and the surroundings are also very miserable.
It sits on a viaduct above the remains of the ailing town centre. The platform-level station buildings have been demolished, and the platforms blocked off part way along, making them too short for the occasional 4-car 158 or 170 services along the line (these only ever appear on quiet services, for reasons best known to EMR). Beyond the fences, the platforms are covered in brambles and litter. The station's elevated position means it is usually very windy, with just a small bus shelter on each platform for protection. At night, the lighting is quite ineffective. On the platforms, you feel simultaneously very exposed, yet also trapped. Platforms are accessed via dingy staircases, which loop back in on themselves, so you can't see the bottom of the staircase from the street, or from the platform, making them feel quite secluded and threatening. There are no lifts to platform level. Services are hourly, making it quite useless for local travel.
From the platforms, the view is spectacular. On one side, the decaying remains of the phoenix pottery works, a small patch of wasteland serving as a car park, a closed-down adult entertainment shop (good for catching things other than trains), a fire-gutted house, one of the worst-rated hotels in the country, and an empty churchyard (church long since demolished). On the other, the back of a Tesco Extra, an overgrown part-demolished bus station, a car wash run from a shipping container, a collapsing row of empty shops, the faded grandeur of the old town hall, and a very busy road junction. You will often find a group of addicts lurking under the bridge, or occasionally sleeping under the stairs to the platforms.
Positives: volunteers clean the station and tend to some flower boxes (many thanks for your efforts). These don't do much for the overall ambiance, especially at this time of year when everything is dead. There's some fading artwork on the viaduct walls. The in-use parts of the platforms are usually kept free of litter. Heading east from the station, the line crosses a fairly interesting old bridge.
100% agree with this, Longton is one of the very few places on the national network where ive genuniely felt uneasy while waiting for the train, the town centre is also a place to avoid at all costs after dark.I propose Longton station on the Crewe-Derby line as a strong contender for Bleakest station. The station itself is quite bleak, and the surroundings are also very miserable.
It sits on a viaduct above the remains of the ailing town centre. The platform-level station buildings have been demolished, and the platforms blocked off part way along, making them too short for the occasional 4-car 158 or 170 services along the line (these only ever appear on quiet services, for reasons best known to EMR). Beyond the fences, the platforms are covered in brambles and litter. The station's elevated position means it is usually very windy, with just a small bus shelter on each platform for protection. At night, the lighting is quite ineffective. On the platforms, you feel simultaneously very exposed, yet also trapped. Platforms are accessed via dingy staircases, which loop back in on themselves, so you can't see the bottom of the staircase from the street, or from the platform, making them feel quite secluded and threatening. There are no lifts to platform level. Services are hourly, making it quite useless for local travel.
From the platforms, the view is spectacular. On one side, the decaying remains of the phoenix pottery works, a small patch of wasteland serving as a car park, a closed-down adult entertainment shop (good for catching things other than trains), a fire-gutted house, one of the worst-rated hotels in the country, and an empty churchyard (church long since demolished). On the other, the back of a Tesco Extra, an overgrown part-demolished bus station, a car wash run from a shipping container, a collapsing row of empty shops, the faded grandeur of the old town hall, and a very busy road junction. You will often find a group of addicts lurking under the bridge, or occasionally sleeping under the stairs to the platforms.
Positives: volunteers clean the station and tend to some flower boxes (many thanks for your efforts). These don't do much for the overall ambiance, especially at this time of year when everything is dead. There's some fading artwork on the viaduct walls. The in-use parts of the platforms are usually kept free of litter. Heading east from the station, the line crosses a fairly interesting old bridge.
100% agree with this, Longton is one of the very few places on the national network where ive genuniely felt uneasy while waiting for the train, the town centre is also a place to avoid at all costs after dark.
To be honest, all the stations in the Stoke on Trent urban area match the critieria of bleak...
Would Kensal Green or other stations on the Watford line count as "bleak", at least back in the Silverlink days, before TFL increased the security with ticket barriers and staff? Or possibly others served in the areas..
Edit: @Russel just beat me to it!
I remember spotting at South Kenton in the early 2000s as a teenager in the Silverlink days, I don't recall it feeling unsafe, but looking back now, it probably wasn't the best place to be...
South Kenton was never one of the worst stations on that section. Kendal Green, Willesden Junction, Harlesden and Stonebridge Park were always the worst, Wembley Central and North Wembley not great either. Willesden Junction was okay at times when there was more of a staff presence.
South Kenton was never one of the worst stations on that section. Kendal Green, Willesden Junction, Harlesden and Stonebridge Park were always the worst, Wembley Central and North Wembley not great either. Willesden Junction was okay at times when there was more of a staff presence.
I used to know the DC line very well from a professional point of view. South Kenton is a very decent 1930's suburb and perfectly safe - though a bit quiet. Wembley Central architectually grim and a bit dodgy (but staffed) - Harlesden and Stonebridge Park certainly ones for concern though - and adjacent areas - McDonalds in Harlesden had bullet holes in the ceiling for example.
Station staffing made a huge difference , but the route had excellent live monitered CCTV with great staff and they were first class in watching out for vulnerable passengers and miscreants ......
I used to know the DC line very well from a professional point of view. South Kenton is a very decent 1930's suburb and perfectly safe - though a bit quiet. Wembley Central architectually grim and a bit dodgy (but staffed) - Harlesden and Stonebridge Park certainly ones for concern though - and adjacent areas - McDonalds in Harlesden had bullet holes in the ceiling for example.
Station staffing made a huge difference , but the route had excellent live monitered CCTV with great staff and they were first class in watching out for vulnerable passengers and miscreants ......
It does have a rather isolated feel though, either way, a bleak island platform with one way in and out via a grotty subway.
I recall Stonebridge having a bad reputation, the surrounding estates have a rather colourful reputation, or used to anyway.
I remember when LU took over the stations and they were doing the specs for the station works, one of the items of work was “repairs to bullet holes at Harlesden”.
I wouldn’t be surprised South Kenton is a bit less genteel nowadays though, as it sadly the case across London as a whole.
Queens Park to Wembley Central was a pretty grim experience on the Bakerloo Line in the 90s. Less so on Silverlink, perversely the shorter trains probably helped a bit as it meant they were less isolated.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Stonebridge estate has been redeveloped now I think. There was another dodgy estate somewhere else near one of the stations as well, possibly near Queen’s Park? The whole area is still pretty dodgy though.
I wouldn’t be surprised South Kenton is a bit less genteel nowadays though, as it sadly the case across London as a whole.
Queens Park to Wembley Central was a pretty grim experience on the Bakerloo Line in the 90s. Less so on Silverlink, perversely the shorter trains probably helped a bit as it meant they were less isolated.
The Windermere Pub at South Kenton - possibly listed - has some very attractive internal fittings and is well worth a visit. That subway is admittedly grotty , cannot recall any incidents there apart from some Dawin award seeker who decided to climb one of the 25kV gantries on the down fast one windy Winter evening , who was blown onto the up DC lines and electrocuted .......
I mentioned before the 313's were busier off peak than the Bakerloo , particulary evening - as I guess people felt safer in numbers than a virtually empty tube train. (not helped possibly by some key performance indicator that had passenger service mileage as "tick in the box" so that Harrow - Stonebridge very late trains stayed in passenger service for basically no passengers.)
Some lively entertainment venues at both Harrow and inner London occassionally caused rowdy behaviour on the trains.
Was there ever much antisocial behaviour / danger to passenger safety on the 313s or Bakerloo back in the days of Silverlink or did it just have a poor reputation due to some of the areas it served?
Was there ever much antisocial behaviour / danger to passenger safety on the 313s or Bakerloo back in the days of Silverlink or did it just have a poor reputation due to some of the areas it served?
Not excessively on the 313's - for reasons I mentioned before. I organised some reveue checks on board late evening trains one year - with some plain clothed BTP in attendance for insurance - did some checking myself , including the last down DC on a Friday evening - and amazingly virtually all had tickets or passes - one ticketless traveller offered a full can of Guiness as payment ! (which I naturally refused !)
The line had a very poor local reputation , especially compared to the Met and Jubilee lines - part of the North London Line had bigger issues in my opinion , and at one time late evening services on the Watford - St Albans line (from the Watford end !)
Rarely dull moments on the routes !
I was about to tag you when the DC line was mentioned - as soon as I thought "bleak stations" I thought "ChiefPlanner will have some opinions on this from their days on NLR/Silverlink!"I used to know the DC line very well from a professional point of view. South Kenton is a very decent 1930's suburb and perfectly safe - though a bit quiet. Wembley Central architectually grim and a bit dodgy (but staffed) - Harlesden and Stonebridge Park certainly ones for concern though - and adjacent areas - McDonalds in Harlesden had bullet holes in the ceiling for example.
Station staffing made a huge difference , but the route had excellent live monitered CCTV with great staff and they were first class in watching out for vulnerable passengers and miscreants ......
I'm too young to remember the pre-Overground days, but I have seen some late 1980s cab ride footage of the NLL in those days. Do you think that back then some of those stations might have qualified for "most bleak station"? Especially the ones down towards the North Woolwich end of the line (though I remember Kentish Town West looking particularly grim in the footage too).The line had a very poor local reputation , especially compared to the Met and Jubilee lines - part of the North London Line had bigger issues in my opinion , and at one time late evening services on the Watford - St Albans line (from the Watford end !)
Rarely dull moments on the routes !
Never remember hearinng about any incidents happening on the 313's but the 501's were in a very dire state in their latter days ( Think clapped out northern 150 with the graffiti of a 72 TS ).Was there ever much antisocial behaviour / danger to passenger safety on the 313s or Bakerloo back in the days of Silverlink or did it just have a poor reputation due to some of the areas it served?
Close, it was 2-EPBs in the 63xx sequence, and it was the North London Line only - I don't ever recall seeing one on the Euston - Watford line.Irrc in their latter days they put some 4EPB's on the DC and North London lines to substitute in for the worst the 501's while 313's were being brought in.