• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Best DMU for passenger comfort?

Status
Not open for further replies.

j.crocker355

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2016
Messages
28
What's the Best DMU for passenger comfort?

Was sitting on a Chilterns class 170 back to Oxford today and it occurred to me how much like sitting on a BR Mk3 HST it was.. it felt like loco hauled stock. You could actually hear yourself speak.

Engine noise at speed was barely noticeable (an indicator for the engine noise of the MTU engined Hitachi IEP?) Not screaming loud like a 165/166/180

Bus wise I have the same problem with Enviro's the engines are just so whiney and noisy in the passenger cabin.. hate them!

Anyways


Wifi was excellent

Seats were comfortable and not back breaking (no standing either!)

No stability issues at speed it felt much like a HST at some point for speed and refinement.

What's everyone's thoughts on the best DMU for passenger comfort?



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
20,401
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
What's the Best DMU for passenger comfort?

Was sitting on a Chilterns class 170 back to Oxford today and it occurred to me how much like sitting on a BR Mk3 HST it was.. it felt like loco hauled stock. You could actually hear yourself speak.

Engine noise at speed was barely noticeable (an indicator for the engine noise of the MTU engined Hitachi IEP?) Not screaming loud like a 165/166/180

Bus wise I have the same problem with Enviro's the engines are just so whiney and noisy in the passenger cabin.. hate them!

Anyways


Wifi was excellent

Seats were comfortable and not back breaking (no standing either!)

No stability issues at speed it felt much like a HST at some point for speed and refinement.

What's everyone's thoughts on the best DMU for passenger comfort?



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

A lot depends on where one sits on a DMU. A class 165, for example, can be very quiet indeed if sitting directly behind the driving cab. It all depends where one is sitting relative to the location of the engine.
 

j.crocker355

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2016
Messages
28
Oh forgot to add working heating/air-conditioning lol put it this way I'm travelling Chilterns a lot more than Great Western these days.. that and it only cost me and two kids £22 to travel to London and back over two days..

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

Mulberry2016

Member
Joined
25 Sep 2016
Messages
39
DMU? I like the Super Voyagers when you can get a seat on them. Great view from the window seats, fast and quiet.
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,759
Location
Chester
I like a few different types and I find it hard to choose between them, so I'll list them all.

Classes 156, 158, 175, 180 and 185.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
I've been very impressed with the 175s. Quiet, comfortable, nice big windows, good luggage space. I think they're the best I've come across. A good 158 is pretty decent, although they can be variable. I do like 170s too - pretty comfortable and nice seating.

I do have a soft spot for 156s, but it'd be a push to say that they're the "best for passenger comfort".
 

xc170

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
815
You got to be kidding?. You need ear plugs and nose peg for a peacefull trip that's if you can get a seat.

God forbid anyone have anything positive to say about Voyagers on this forum...

I'd nominate the 175.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,511
DMU? I like the Super Voyagers when you can get a seat on them. Great view from the window seats, fast and quiet.

Yes when engines wifi , toilets and tilt iare working correctly they're probably the best preforming DMUs we have in the uk
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
I find the Greater Anglia 156s to be pretty good for the most part, given a comparison with other 156s and any 15x units, really.

In terms of slightly more modern stock, 171s take my vote. 168s are also pretty good but I've been on one or two which have been more annoying in terms of random rattling noises, over the last year or so. If 171s had free wifi and a quiet zone on the 4 coach units (hard on the 2 coach ones, though it could be done), I think they'd be hard to beat. They even still have catering trolley areas and spacious 2+1 in First Class (a novelty in the South)!
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,809
Location
West of Andover
I find the Greater Anglia 156s to be pretty good for the most part, given a comparison with other 156s and any 15x units, really.

In terms of slightly more modern stock, 171s take my vote. 168s are also pretty good but I've been on one or two which have been more annoying in terms of random rattling noises, over the last year or so. If 171s had free wifi and a quiet zone on the 4 coach units (hard on the 2 coach ones, though it could be done), I think they'd be hard to beat. They even still have catering trolley areas and spacious 2+1 in First Class (a novelty in the South)!

One slight mark down on the GA 156s is the lack of seat back tables for the airline seating
 

FQ

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,645
Location
-
The 175 for me - good passenger comfort, light and airy and the doors in the right place for a long distance unit.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
really?

I still recall travelling back from stratford on avon to london (a service which I believe has now been largely withdrawn) on a clubman and loud rattling inducing a bad headache
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
You got to be kidding?. You need ear plugs and nose peg for a peacefull trip that's if you can get a seat.

:lol:
 

Phil from Mon

Member
Joined
28 Nov 2014
Messages
406
Location
Beaumaris, Ynys Môn
i don't have a problem with the super voyagers, and ATWs 175s and refurbished 158s are fine for medium distances, but over a journey of 4 hours and more the constant engine noise and (admittedly much less than first generation dmus) vibration is pretty exhausting compared with the same time in a pendolino or in loco-hauled stock
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,933
Location
Fenny Stratford
I will go class 185. I think they are really good and comfortable. The 180 is comfortable but just seems to vibrate so much.

DMU? I like the Super Voyagers when you can get a seat on them. Great view from the window seats, fast and quiet.

i assume that is an ironic post or you are deaf!

Yes when engines wifi , toilets and tilt iare working correctly they're probably the best preforming DMUs we have in the uk

Superb - especially when every component resonates at a slightly different frequency and the seats seem to have been designed by a perverted midget torturer!
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,354
Location
Yorkshire
Pedantic I know, but Chiltern don't have any 170s - they have 172s and 168s (some of the latter were converted from TPE 170/3s). When they were with TPE, those units were among the most comfortable, and I always tried to aim for 170 services when possible. Other contenders are the Calder Valley 110 units, and 158s (particularly the Northern Spirit TPE units).
 

Tubeboy

Member
Joined
9 May 2009
Messages
487
Location
London
I found Scotrail's 170s very pleasant when travelling round Scotland a couple of years back.
 

railfan100

On Moderation
Joined
31 Oct 2016
Messages
212
Location
London
For me I would say the Class 158 units with the original seating when they were in new condition. The ride of the 158 is so smooth even on bullhead rail, and when they were new it was so silky smooth the units did not trigger track circuits!

In later years would have to say the Class 175 despite having poor build quality when new including overheating engines, cracks in the bogies as well as numerous overall quality issues they did ride well. Also the seating on the 175 is good although not been on one for around 5 years.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
The ride of the 158 is so smooth even on bullhead rail, and when they were new it was so silky smooth the units did not trigger track circuits!

Eh? Why would a silky smooth ride cause problems with track circuits? It rather sounds like a fault with, or requiring the installation of, TCAs (Track Circuit Actuators / Assisters).
 

F Great Eastern

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2009
Messages
3,851
Location
UK
Class 175
Class 185
Class 158 (ATW, like the FGW style seats, let down by no wifi tho)
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,573
Location
Macclesfield
Eh? Why would a silky smooth ride cause problems with track circuits? It rather sounds like a fault with, or requiring the installation of, TCAs (Track Circuit Actuators / Assisters).
Indeed, the problems that the 158s initially had activating track circuits were nothing to do with ride quality and everything to do with the use of disc brakes instead of tread. This allowed a build up of leaf mulch and other detritus around the wheel tread, causing a reduction in conductivity. They were subsequently fitted with 'scrubbers' to alleviate the problem.
 
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
1,909
Personally in my opinion i think that the 165 / 166 / 168 / 170 / 171 / 172 / 185 are the best DMUs for passenger comfort. They are all well designed trains.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,480
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
I can be very specific here - 166205's first class. It is the only unit to have received an internal refurbishment and the leather seats are very pleasant. This, of course, is assuming that HSTs are excluded from the category of DMUs, which is debatable.
 
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
1,909
I can be very specific here - 166205's first class. It is the only unit to have received an internal refurbishment and the leather seats are very pleasant. This, of course, is assuming that HSTs are excluded from the category of DMUs, which is debatable.

Are they planning on refurbishing the other 165s and 166s as well? Personally i would classify HSTs as Locomotive Hauled Trains rather than DMUs.
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,386
Location
Birmingham
I will go class 185. I think they are really good and comfortable.
Agreed with this. Amazingly quiet for a DMU (on the inside), comfortable seats (subjective) and window alignment tends to be good.

Afterwards 175s (also very quiet, seats are very good, let down by lack of first class, the state of fittings/bogs, lack of power points and not enough tables.)

Third place Virgin's 221s, when speeding down the WCML at full tilt they are excellent. Let down by rattling at lower speeds. The less said about the XC units the better.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,424
Location
UK
The GW and HT 180s, - comfortable seats, good legroom, quiet, good window alignment
 

J-2739

Established Member
Joined
30 Jul 2016
Messages
2,238
Location
London
185s and 158/9s. Tied.

Pacers are outdated pieces of cr*p, while other Sprinters are simply boring and uncomfortable. In my honest opinion.
 

hurricanemk1c

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2013
Messages
257
Location
Portlaoise, Co. Laois, Eire
Extending it to Ireland, you have the Class 22000 ICR Fleet. Quiet, free wi-fi, comfy seats (although not Mark 3 league), all seats are aligned to windows, stunning performers (in the right hands), good capacity, good toilets - and the basic set (be it 3, 4 or 5) is network-capable
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top