• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Bad manners on the roads

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
On some roads though, for example the A406 in North East London the road is 3 lanes between junctions but only 2 lanes through the junctions. The junctions are often so close together that there isn't always time to keep go back into lane 1 after the junction as you need to be in lane 2 again for the next junction unless you are leaving the road.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,877
Location
UK
At these junctions, and I know the A406 well - just like the A10 near it - you simple merge in as you go. Lane 1 stays as lane 1. Lane 2 and Lane 3 merge.

In some exceptional cases, lanes 1 and 2 merge which is silly - as lane 1 users shouldn't need to worry about merging. Part of this problem is down to the design of junctions at the time, and different interpretations of the rules by different local authorities (now that they're generally responsible where the Highways Agency might have been before).

Believe me, there's plenty of time on a junction to merge and you should always move back to lane 1 if it's empty. If you're turning later on, change lanes near the junction - don't sit in the outside lane with your right indicator on for a mile or two, as plenty of people do which annoys the hell out of me.

Remember the rule: Keep left unless overtaking. Very simple! Would stop all middle lane hoggers in an instant if people adhered to that simple rule.
 

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
At these junctions, and I know the A406 well - just like the A10 near it - you simple merge in as you go. Lane 1 stays as lane 1. Lane 2 and Lane 3 merge.
Not quite sure what you are saying there, lane 2 and lane 3 do not merge they stay as separate lanes.
Believe me, there's plenty of time on a junction to merge and you should always move back to lane 1 if it's empty. If you're turning later on, change lanes near the junction - don't sit in the outside lane with your right indicator on for a mile or two, as plenty of people do which annoys the hell out of me.
On the A406 with some of the junctions you see the get in lane signs for the next junction almost immediately as soon as lane 1 rejoins the formation. There isn't time to get back into lane 1 before you pass the sign telling you to get in lane for the next junction. Are you suggesting that you should go back into lane 1 again for a short time even when the signs are clearing showing lane 1 as the lane for the next junction and lanes 2 and 3 to remain on the road?
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,877
Location
UK
On some junctions you have three lanes going ahead at traffic lights, with just two soon after - so two lanes merge into one.

On some junctions it will be lane 1 stays and 2 & 3 merge. At others, it will be lane 1 & 2 merging and lane 3 staying on. The road markings may make this clear, but in traffic it can be easy to miss - especially if you're behind a van/lorry/bus etc.

Now I do know the North Circular well, but it's a long road and has many different ways of handling junctions and roundabouts as it crosses from one Borough to another.

Anyway, I think I've made it quite clear.

If two junctions are close together then it is somewhat different to what I said about driving a mile or two in the right hand lane isn't it!
 

strange6

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2011
Messages
1,920
Location
Wigan, Greater manchester
On my way home from work tonight, I have nearly had 3 collisions with people either pulling out of a side street very late in front of me or had been in the wrong position at a roundabout. Not one of them waved their hand to apologise but instead just looked at me as though I was in the wrong. The standard of driving is getting worse and worse, that's for sure
 

Seacook

Member
Joined
17 May 2010
Messages
456
Location
West Bromwich
On my way home from work tonight, I have nearly had 3 collisions with people either pulling out of a side street very late in front of me or had been in the wrong position at a roundabout. Not one of them waved their hand to apologise but instead just looked at me as though I was in the wrong. The standard of driving is getting worse and worse, that's for sure

If you nearly had three collisions in one journey, they could be right!
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
If you nearly had three collisions in one journey, they could be right!

That sounds like an old Jasper Carrot joke about a little old lady who had been driving for 50 years and never had an accident. She'd seen thousands...
 

strange6

Established Member
Joined
9 Jan 2011
Messages
1,920
Location
Wigan, Greater manchester
I knew stupid comments like this would come flooding in. How can it be your fault when somebody turns out in front of you from a side street and you're just going straight down the road. Do you people drive or are you just posting comments to P people off?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
lol, you all moan about other peoples standards of driving.... i bet your all as bad as each other!

And coming from somebody who boasts about driving at well in excess of 100mph, I'll treat your stupid comment with all the comtempt that it deserves
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
If you nearly had three collisions in one journey, they could be right!

Errrrr, I was there, you were not.
 
Last edited:

90019

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2008
Messages
6,890
Location
Featherstone, West Yorkshire
I knew stupid comments like this would come flooding in. How can it be your fault when somebody turns out in front of you from a side street and you're just going straight down the road. Do you people drive or are you just posting comments to P people off?

You could be going too fast ;)

And coming from somebody who boasts about driving at well in excess of 100mph, I'll treat your stupid comment with all the comtempt that it deserves

He does, however, drive professionally, so I'd say he knows what he's talking about.
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
lol, you all moan about other peoples standards of driving.... i bet your all as bad as each other!
And surely what is more to the point, if the majority of people are agreed the standards actually are declining, (and if those same peoploe are motorists) then we'd expect most of them to also agree that their own standard is declining (or is worse than their predecessors' standards).

Or is this a matter on which people are only able to see poor standards in other people but are unable to see it in themselves?
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,892
Location
South Wales
I do admit the hazard perception test is a bit stupid, when i was learning to drive a car it took me 4 attempts to pass it and only reason failed was that kept clicking too early or spotting another hazard thinking it was the 1 i had to click for.

I passed 1st time though when i did my PCV licence though.

I do remember when doing my pcv licence my instructer was very strict and would not hesitate at shouting at us, 1 problem i had a at times was not always checking my mirrors, i do remember 1 lad nearly ending up cliping a traffic light. while turning right at a junction.

That said i have seen some bad driving from some proffesional drivers, mind you most of these i have seen are foreign lorries . I had one of these actually start to pull into the lane right in front of me as i was about to pass him in the middle lane onmthe m4 just after Jct 34 , lets just say that driver certainly woke up after me blasting the horn.

I have always fancied getting a horn from a class 37 or hst and installing in on my car or bus which should give some people a bit of a shock if i have to use it.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
John said in full
He is saying that if you believe that the speed limit is not a target speed then you could fail an advanced test. People clearly do think that the speed limit is a target speed.
You can also fail your normal driving test for "hesitation" if you drive too slowly for the conditions, I know as i failed my first for this error,

That may well be the case but I'd like to see less dangerous overtaking moves that some lunatics attempt, lower speed limits would help with this.

If someone is going to break the speedlimits and overtake dangerously they will regardless of whether its a 50, 60 or 70 limit.

That may apply to rural tractor drivers but urban drivers just don't give a stuff in my opinion; and some have the barefaced cheek to look back at the long line of traffic behind them and still not pull over for a minute or two. It has not been unknown for me to give them the full fisted shuffle on overtaking them

When i was doing some farm work a few summers ago, i had it drummed into me that if your in a 40 or greater limit area in a tractor, if you pass 3 opportunitys to pull over and let traffic pass but fail to, you can be charged for inconsiderate driving, unsure whether this is true or just the employer i was working for wanting considerate driving.

Sadly 'lack of spatial awareness' would probably account for the majority of examples of poor driving discussed here or elsewhere!

Indeed, i was in a row of cars today, and an oncoming car flashed my row through the gap, (not wide enough for oncoming cars to pass). he failed to notice that he had a row behind him, and that if he let more than 2 cars through, then he'd end up causing complete chaos, as there was not room for more than 3 cars to fill the gap, before being blocked by the cars behind him.

In some cases people are just not used to driving in certain situations though. As I said earlier you can pass a driving test without ever having driven at more than 40 mph or you may have driven at 70 mph but never had to deal with city driving.

Although as i mention above you can fail a test for hesitation if you fail to keep up with the traffic flow,
 

Zoe

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,905
Although as i mention above you can fail a test for hesitation if you fail to keep up with the traffic flow,
But if the car you are taking the test in is only capable of 100 kmh (62.5 mph) and the other traffic is moving at 70 mph you would still pass?
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
But if the car you are taking the test in is only capable of 100 kmh (62.5 mph) and the other traffic is moving at 70 mph you would still pass?

Your car would be deemed unsuitable to take a test in, Requirements for a test include the need for the car to be capable of a minimum of 70mph.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
But if the car you are taking the test in is only capable of 100 kmh (62.5 mph) and the other traffic is moving at 70 mph you would still pass?

ignore my above comment, regarding replying to this,
70mph is only permitted on dual carriageways, which would have a overtaking lane, so you are not holding anyone up, however if you go on a 60mph single carriageway, you need to be capable of keeping up with the flow,

Can you actually get a car that is as slow as a top speed of 62.5mph?
I had a courtesy car daewoo matiz a few years ago which was only an 800cc engine, and that could do 80+mph, and i'm sure was one of the slowest cars available in britain,
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,877
Location
UK
Besides some electric cars designed purely for city use, I can't think of a car that has a stop speed of under 70mph.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
Can you actually get a car that is as slow as a top speed of 62.5mph?
I had a courtesy car daewoo matiz a few years ago which was only an 800cc engine, and that could do 80+mph, and i'm sure was one of the slowest cars available in britain,

Probably not a modern one, but my mum once had a Citroen Visa that could barely do 60 and usually ended up being dragged down to 40-50 on the climb north of Welwyn on the A1(M).
 

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,824
Location
Stirlingshire
ignore my above comment, regarding replying to this,
70mph is only permitted on dual carriageways, which would have a overtaking lane, so you are not holding anyone up, however if you go on a 60mph single carriageway, you need to be capable of keeping up with the flow,

Can you actually get a car that is as slow as a top speed of 62.5mph?
I had a courtesy car daewoo matiz a few years ago which was only an 800cc engine, and that could do 80+mph, and i'm sure was one of the slowest cars available in britain,

One of those Trabants they used to have in East Germany - if they did 80km /h never mind 80mph they'd fall apart I suspect :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top