Is anyone aware of a train blocking the line yet due to staff not wanting to work overtime?Yes No
Only takes a bit of disruption such as a unit failure and extra shunts become required. These are not diagrammed anywhere so no driver has to contractually do them and there is very little slack so favours are usually asked. These favours will be politely declined, which then means services have to be cancelled to get a driver to clear the line.
Why don't they just do overtime bans, not strikes?Yes. This is why it is often far more effective as it’s so very hard to pre-judge.
Well if they accept the changes then how easily can they be undone when Labour gets into power?So do I, which rather makes taking further action until that time pointless, as there will be just loss of pay for no progress until that date
For example, they want to be able to decide what times of the day a driver works when they are given a roster, rather than them having certainly in advance that during x period they will be doing nights and y period days.
It would mean they can't plan for a social life as they would never know what hours of the day they would be working until they were given a roster.
That doesn't seem fair to me.
If they are operating a near normal service, why is there a 40-minute gap between Redhill and Gatwick Aiport this week, most hours? That isn't normal.Surely ASLEF should be taking the necessary measures to get this resolved or to bring the RDG/ govt to the table. That’s the whole point of strike action. An overtime ban isn’t and won’t have the desired effect and I’m pretty sure the drivers (and the TOCS) don’t care much about this “industrial actThe” the railway will operate to a near-normal service…
Last edited: