WizCastro197
Established Member
To avoid starting off-topic discussion in the Class 769 (GWR) Introduction thread, I've began a new thread to discuss whether the Electrostars (357/375/376/377/378/387) are showing 'wear' or if they are 'old'.
On the topic of age, I also believe this statement is again misleading, as the oldest ones introduced in 1999 are now approaching half life or are over that slightly and the newer 387s have not even has a quarter of their life complete yet.
What are your thoughts? Surely wear must be exacerbated by the amount of passengers that use these units per day?
Well they are showing wear anyway
From these posts, it is unclear which class of Electrostar the member is referring to, as there are so many of them. However, I do believe it is wrong to say they are all showing wear even though some of the oldest ones aren't yet, thanks to extensive refurbishment carried out by Southeastern/Eversholt on the 375s just a few years ago. The Southern 377s are all scheduled to be refurbished by 2025, although not as extensively, with new reading lights, improved PIS (passenger information system) font and new information screens being the main highlights, except no new seat cover. Of course there are the 376s who definitely do show wear, not just because of the large amount of passengers these trains face on a day to day basis, but because no refurbishment has been scheduled since 2004 when they were introduced.In post 26 the electro star trains are getting old now
On the topic of age, I also believe this statement is again misleading, as the oldest ones introduced in 1999 are now approaching half life or are over that slightly and the newer 387s have not even has a quarter of their life complete yet.
What are your thoughts? Surely wear must be exacerbated by the amount of passengers that use these units per day?

