• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

91 tnt?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dstrat

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
194
Has this ever been tried? Would it even be feasible or would it overload the lines?

Cheers!
________
CM185T
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,291
Has this ever been tried? Would it even be feasible or would it overload the lines?

Cheers!

I believe they were trying something like when East coast hired a CrossCountry HST about 1 months ago. Not sure though
 

37401

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2008
Messages
3,276
Location
Birmingham
I dont think its been T+T but there have been doubble headders on IEP test trains
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
There were tests done last year between Grantham and Newark Northgate involving a Mk4 set being top and tailed with 2 91s.

The trials were a complete success as they were designed to see if the IEP could run in normal operation with both pans up.

I don't know much more then that other then what I was told by one of the test drivers.

I know the set ran ECS via Hertford from Bounds Green to the test site but for obvious reasons only using one pan to the test site.

So in answer to the Op, yes they have operated with both pans up before although only as parts of the tests - in normal operation, only one pan is used and if the loco is a failure then another 91 is used or the Thunderbird is used.
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Wasn't there some sort of discussion about this when the GNER train derailed at Selby when that Land Rover ended up on the tracks? I know it is a few years ago now, but there were stories in the press saying that the train wouldn't have derailed (or to a lesser extent) if the 91 had been at the front and not back, due to the difference in weight between a 91 and 82.
 

mumrar

Established Member
Joined
26 Sep 2008
Messages
2,650
Location
Redditch
I know it is a few years ago now, but there were stories in the press saying that the train wouldn't have derailed (or to a lesser extent) if the 91 had been at the front and not back

Most likely just stories, as is usually the case with the press. There was no specific research carried out after the disaster to determine if that was the case, so the usual press blowing smoke up everybodies ass again! Unsubstantiated rubbish, overheard third hand, and sounded good to an editor I guess.
 

A60K

Member
Joined
26 Jun 2008
Messages
1,030
Location
Kilburn
Most likely just stories, as is usually the case with the press. There was no specific research carried out after the disaster to determine if that was the case, so the usual press blowing smoke up everybodies ass again! Unsubstantiated rubbish, overheard third hand, and sounded good to an editor I guess.

There was research carried out after the Polmont accident however, and a train will behave differently depending on circumstances and whether it is being hauled or propelled.


 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Although tests would have to be done, it seems relatively straight forward that the comparative weight of a 91 vs. a 82 would have meant the train would have been less likely to have become derailed.
 

royaloak

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2009
Messages
1,389
Location
today I will mostly be at home decorating

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
I always thought the problem with two electric locos at opposite ends was the rear pantograph losing contact with the wire. That's why APT had the power cars in the middle of the train, thus using one pan rather than two. TGVs tend to use one pan and a bus line along the entire train. Eurostars use two, but I think they sometimes have problems with the loss of contact. Still, it's a bit hard to see from outside.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
Hopefully the "postponement" becomes "cancelled" and the entire thing consigned to the dustbin!
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
A bit like NASA cancelling Constellation, waste of what has been spent so far (in NASA's case $10Billion) but better in the long run?
 

Drsatan

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
1,887
Location
Land of the Sprinters
A bit like NASA cancelling Constellation, waste of what has been spent so far (in NASA's case $10Billion) but better in the long run?

Or even Crossrail, which the Tories 'support' but aren't committed to. I wouldn't be surprised if Crossrail was canned after the general election by a Tory government even though work's already started.
 

dstrat

Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
194
Cheers for your answers all. I can only imagine the acceleration of the thing....maybe even a 395 beater! I was wondering as the Class 373s apparently had a problem on the ECML as the OHLE was not tightly sprung enough...but cheers :D
________
hot box vaporizer
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top