fat_boy_pete
Member
This unit appears to have suffered in contact with some buffers. Video is in attached tweet.
I wonder if can be repaired at Crown point?
I wonder if can be repaired at Crown point?
The incident was at Crown Point and apparently was yesterday. Reported that it was pushed through by a ROG 37.Oh dear! Where's the location, and is that recent footage?
Ta! Is that the Crown Point (Depot) just outside Norwich?The incident was at Crown Point and apparently was yesterday.
The incident was at Crown Point and apparently was yesterday. Reported that it was pushed through by a ROG 37.
Did wonder! Difficult to tell from a 15 second video clip, but is the damage occasioned likely to be more substantial than just replacing the nose cone assembly?Is it an issue as with the HST nose cones where it's primarily fibreglass?
It was being propelled at the time.Obviously a larger STOP sign is needed.
Who's done that then?This unit appears to have suffered in contact with some buffers. Video is in attached tweet.
I wonder if can be repaired at Crown point?
Who's done that then?
Reported that it was pushed through by a ROG 37.
37884 by any chance? Always been a cheeky little so-and-soThe incident was at Crown Point and apparently was yesterday. Reported that it was pushed through by a ROG 37.
Need to get some solid 60's Russian gear.It’s quite ridiculous that European trains can get this much damage after a small-speed shunt in a thin depot buffer stop.
Trains, like cars, are designed with parts intended to deform in a collision to dissipate energy in as safe a manner as possible.It’s quite ridiculous that European trains can get this much damage after a small-speed shunt in a thin depot buffer stop.
American crash-worthiness standards are even more stringent than european ones, yet American trains come out of crashes much better than European ones.Trains, like cars, are designed with parts intended to deform in a collision to dissipate energy in as safe a manner as possible.
American crash-worthiness standards are even more stringent than european ones, yet American trains come out of crashes much better than European ones.
Probably a good thing given the regularity with which rail accidents happen in the US.American crash-worthiness standards are even more stringent than european ones, yet American trains come out of crashes much better than European ones.
No it doesn't. Standards are designed to protect people, not hardware.IF USA standards are more stringent then it stands to reason their trains would come out better.
Sounds great....Until you meet a German Tiger or Panzer at 100+mph then I might regret that decision....So, what we can all agree on. A train that is built to the standard of a Nato main battle tank but rather than reactive armour over the conventional steel facet type would be a good metre or two of aluminium sacrificial crumple zone covered in a hard fibre glass shell for aesthetics. Seats inside will be the 1940's sprung type with seat belts, side impact airbags and an airbag in the rear of the seat in front.
It’s quite ridiculous that European trains can get this much damage after a small-speed shunt in a thin depot buffer stop.
I think you need to read my message a few times to understand my point.Because old British stuff looks so good after hitting buffer stops...
![]()
That collided with more than just a buffer stop.Because old British stuff looks so good after hitting buffer stops...
![]()