They'll be returned to depot for cleaning as soon as reasonably practical.Saw 377 614 and 621 heavily grafiited this morning on a fast LBG from ECR. About 940 ish. How long will it be allowed to run in this state. Does Southern have a policy of not running grafiited stock? Thanks
Probably done in Epsom sidings... or maybe Tattenham.Saw 377 614 and 621 heavily grafiited this morning on a fast LBG from ECR. About 940 ish. How long will it be allowed to run in this state. Does Southern have a policy of not running grafiited stock? Thanks
Any graffiti covering the windows will also be taken out of service, offensive or not.
You've got me there. I've always assumed it was for safety reasons, as taking the unit out of service is never ideal and quite often drivers will refuse to work it anyway.I've always wondered about that. What's the reason behind it ?
About time the sale of paint spray cans is banned they are not good for the environment and have little genuine use
Spray paint has plenty of legitimate uses for home decorations, and in the building and landscaping trades (for starters).About time the sale of paint spray cans is banned they are not good for the environment and have little genuine use
Most trains now have internal passenger information screens that will display the next station on the routeI always understood graffiti covering Windows was an issue for hearing impaired people who may rely on seeing station signage.
Offensive graffiti should be taken out of service at the first practical opportunity.
Any graffiti covering the windows will also be taken out of service, offensive or not.
Not unbelievable at all. It is well known that the graffiti vandals like to see their work in public - it gives more kudos, apparently. So having trains running around with graffiti on only encourages more vandalism - go to Belgium or Slovenia to see the effect of that. Therefore the policy should be one of zero tolerance with trains taken out of service to be cleaned.As long as the brakes work let the trains run, we have enough issues with trains not running as it is without someone wanting trains to be taken out of service because of a bit of graffiti, offensive or not.
If you're offended, look the other way.
Unbelieveable.
Agreed. Don't let these criminal vandals think they're the norm.Not unbelievable at all. It is well known that the graffiti vandals like to see their work in public - it gives more kudos, apparently. So having trains running around with graffiti on only encourages more vandalism - go to Belgium or Slovenia to see the effect of that. Therefore the policy should be one of zero tolerance with trains taken out of service to be cleaned.
About time the sale of paint spray cans is banned they are not good for the environment and have little genuine use
Agreed. Don't let these criminal vandals think they're the norm.
I would rather my train turn up than being cancelled due to some graffiti. I think this is Same for the many people taking the train across the country.
Don't go to Belgium then!Oh same here, but I also think graffiti on trains is unacceptable and should be cleaned at the earliest opportunity!
Don't go to Belgium then!
But why should legitimate users of spray cans be penalised for the actions of the graffiti ‘artists’? They’ll just find another way anyway.
Depends a lot on the exact paint/solvent type, the temperature, humidity and wind conditions, but in principle if you got to fresh graffiti within a few hours it might be a bit easier to remove than if it was fully dry. In practise I suspect there is little difference - and of course the staff won't know the exact age and condition of any graffiti they find, so you might be moving a unit from service for an advantage that doesn't actually exist.Would it be a reasonable assumption that, the sooner cleaning happens, the easier it is? Once the paint has hardened and the solvent evaporated off, it would be much the same as the base (proper livery) layer, yes?
If my assumption is correct, then taking a unit out of service 'now' means fewer trains cancelled than if they wait.
Paint chemists feel free to chip in if I'm barking up the wrong tree.
So instead you give the graffiti artists the satisfaction of knowing that they're costing the government hundreds of millions of additional pounds? That just ups the stakes in the game.The possibility of graffiti should be costed-in to fleet renewals with enough spare stock available to cover for any units that are affected. There also needs to be much greater security of sites where trains are parked, and the building of sufficient train sheds to ensure that the majority of stock is stabled under cover. No graffiti artists should be given the satisfaction of knowing that there handiwork will reach a public audience.