• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

313121 now in Network Rail yellow

Status
Not open for further replies.

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,884
Location
UK
In all seriousness, 42" HD screens are almost as cheap as more reasonably sized conventional ones.

Yes, LCD panels are not expensive these days. I doubt it's going to be a Cinema 3D with 1 billion Hz overscanning, Ultra HD resolution, iPlayer and games/apps etc..

I'm looking for a 32-inch panel to hook up to a set top box, and you can get screens for around £200! However, go up to 40-inches or so and - presumably because they're produced in larger numbers these days - they're not much more expensive. In fact, you can get some for the same money with far more features too.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ryan125hst

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1,327
Location
Retford
Network Rail said:
DMOS A will be fitted with a kitchen and seating for passengers and visitors, and the train will also have a toilet – a first for the class.

That toilet would have come in handy for the passengers stuck on the Southern 313! If Network Rail have proved (or will prove) that a toilet can be installed, why didn't Southern do it? Do they plan to repace them with new 377's in the next few years?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,091
Location
Redcar
If Network Rail have proved (or will prove) that a toilet can be installed, why didn't Southern do it?

Well I doubt Network Rail will have to faff around with things like DDA compliance so can get away with a compact toilet (small and easier to install). I also wonder if they have to fit a retention tanked toilet? Basically, I doubt what NR is going to fit to the 313 is going to be suitable for passenger service trains.
 

talltim

Established Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
2,454
The toilet is a bin emptied out the cab door. Southern have been testing the design for them
 

ryan125hst

Established Member
Joined
2 Jun 2011
Messages
1,327
Location
Retford
Well I doubt Network Rail will have to faff around with things like DDA compliance so can get away with a compact toilet (small and easier to install). I also wonder if they have to fit a retention tanked toilet? Basically, I doubt what NR is going to fit to the 313 is going to be suitable for passenger service trains.

That's probably the case. Out of interest (and sorry to go off topic), but how much would it have cost to install a DDA toilet on a 313? Also, how many seats would be lost in the process?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,632
Location
Hampshire
I think the Windhoff MPVs might be newer ;)

Although without being pedantic, like most of NRs fleet the MPVs were inherited. Now, could the 57s be the newest driveable thing in Network Rails fleet? :lol: The old & new combined in one loco then!
 
Last edited:

transportphoto

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Quizmaster
Joined
21 Jan 2010
Messages
5,562

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
on a more serious note, the "Not to be moved" sign appears to have a collection of tags hanging from it- I'm betting these have to be removed, by specific personnel on completion of key tasks, before the sign is allowed to be removed?
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,831
Location
Epsom
Yes, the tag is the personal tag of someone who is working on or underneath it. Each tag represents one person. When they start work, they clip it onto the sign and remove it when they finish, so as long as at least one tag is there, someone is working on the unit somewhere.
 

455driver

Veteran Member
Joined
10 May 2010
Messages
11,329
The toilet is a bin emptied out the cab door. Southern have been testing the design for them

Also been tested on SWT by the drivers but they didnt bother with the bin and it was "direct discharge", um apparently, so somebody told me, no it wasnt me honest! :oops ;)
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,632
Location
Hampshire
Yes, the tag is the personal tag of someone who is working on or underneath it. Each tag represents one person. When they start work, they clip it onto the sign and remove it when they finish, so as long as at least one tag is there, someone is working on the unit somewhere.

Each tag usually also has what section of the depot they are based in on. So if you work in the Fuelling area, it'll either have that on or be a different colour. Can't remember what mine said, it's been a while since i last saw and had to use it.

Also been tested on SWT by the drivers but they didnt bother with the bin and it was "direct discharge", um apparently, so somebody told me, no it wasnt me honest! :oops ;)

Ah yes, are these the infamous Windscreen Washers with extra added chemicals?
 
Last edited:

causton

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
5,504
Location
Somewhere between WY372 and MV7
Each tag usually also has what section of the depot they are based in on. So if you work in the Fuelling area, it'll either have that on or be a different colour. Can't remember what mine said, it's been a while since i last saw and had to use it.

I was wondering what they were for, as I saw one at Norwich with about 5 tags on it - I wondered why there were things dangling from it :o
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,884
Location
UK
I was at FPK one day when myself and FCC staff noticed a train flying up the down fast with the 'do not move' sign still attached and flashing...!

It was pretty quickly stopped further up the line, but I wonder who took responsibility for that one. My memory can't remember what TOC it was, but I think it was a HT 180.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
I was at FPK one day when myself and FCC staff noticed a train flying up the down fast with the 'do not move' sign still attached and flashing...!

It was pretty quickly stopped further up the line, but I wonder who took responsibility for that one. My memory can't remember what TOC it was, but I think it was a HT 180.

Oh dear! :o One hopes there was not a fitter dangling from the underside of it somewhere!

There are several 'reported' cases I've heard about of trains being moved in platforms with a station tanking hose still in place. Makes a bit of a mess of the wall fixings I understand!
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
I was at FPK one day when myself and FCC staff noticed a train flying up the down fast with the 'do not move' sign still attached and flashing...!

It was pretty quickly stopped further up the line, but I wonder who took responsibility for that one. My memory can't remember what TOC it was, but I think it was a HT 180.

I remember that one, can't remember the outcome though.
 

prod_pep

Established Member
Joined
8 Aug 2010
Messages
1,711
Location
Liverpool
313121 made an appearance on the WCML on Friday 5th July looking very smart in its new colours. A couple of videos have popped up of it on YouTube.
 

87015

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2006
Messages
5,078
Location
GEML/WCML/SR
313121 is out again this week - they should put it outside the TMD for old times sake really... Presumably related to all this stepping up a gear, the track inspection coach is spending four nights next week shuffling between Hertford and Stevenage.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
As it's technically a departmental train, why isn't it renumbered to 960121?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top