• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

225s upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Those mock ups look terrible. Not a fan of the electronic reservations - XC seem to have problems all the time, and what's the point of having it only displaying a shortened version of the station name?
 

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
1,013
It was an Eversholt 'thing' nothing to do with First Group.

I just wondered as First had a prototype refurb at swindon as part of their re-bid for the GW franchise. The leather seats and purple walls just screams First Group!!

Reminds me of the interiors of the 158's in Taiwan!
 
Last edited:

dubscottie

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2010
Messages
1,013
And perhaps will experience the same sort of technical problems as XC's?

Paper tickets do the job well enough IMO.

Never done it in the UK yet did in Ireland last weekend booked seats in the name of Fr Ted Crilly!

At least 20 people took pics of the little screen between Dublin and Sligo! Have to put surname as first name etc for it to come up right!
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,021
And perhaps will experience the same sort of technical problems as XC's?
Yeah, one system isn't a very good implementation - so let's not bother trying to improve it eh?

If it's got a traffic light system, then it'll be better than paper labels - as you'll be able to see from a long way off whether a seat is available or not.
 

MattRobinson

Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
276
Location
Wakefield
Another vote for those seats looking awful. Especially standard class. Seems like a ploy to get more people to travel business class or first class. /cynic.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,624
Location
Hampshire
Another vote for those seats looking awful. Especially standard class. Seems like a ploy to get more people to travel business class or first class. /cynic.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

I'm still mixed about them, probably the only way to see if they actually are that comfortable is to see them in person. Might be suitible for something like Thameslink though.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,052
Location
Reston City Centre
Never done it in the UK yet did in Ireland last weekend booked seats in the name of Fr Ted Crilly!

At least 20 people took pics of the little screen between Dublin and Sligo! Have to put surname as first name etc for it to come up right!

Was there a square of black dirt on the train window adjacent to your seat?
 

starrymarkb

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2009
Messages
5,985
Location
Exeter
Notice the purple wall carpet? wonder if this was a First Group thing... Only they could come up with something so horrible and useless!

Doesn't one of the ROSCOs have similar house colours. Who owns the Mk4 sets?

And the Business Class seating looks rather like FGW Standard
 

317666

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2009
Messages
1,775
Location
East Anglia
That 'business class' seating happens to be the same as standard class seating on an ATW 158: http://www.flickr.com/photos/max_rail_photos_ii/7577568514/

Don't get me wrong, those seats are very comfortable but really should only be in standard class as they're designed to be narrow enough to fit in 2+2 seating. The current first class seats on Mk4s are a lot wider and also recline. If narrower, non-reclining seats are the sort of comfort we can expect from business class, which will no doubt have a hefty price tag, then I don't expect those standard class seats to be comfortable or anything of the sort! The seats in standard seem to be a bit low down too. Thank god it's only a mock-up!
 

Skimble19

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2009
Messages
1,508
Location
London
Are they also not the same seats but with a different headrest to those in Standard on EMT 158s and FGW HST's?
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,217
Location
UK
Are they also not the same seats but with a different headrest to those in Standard on EMT 158s and FGW HST's?

Yes, I havent used the ATW ones, but I think they coud provide a good balance of Priviacy and visibility, due to the smaller headrests. But I would still be concerned there may be some claustrophobia, and they can feel quite hard.
 

aylesbury

Member
Joined
3 Feb 2012
Messages
622
At last the MK 4 stock is to get a decent interior upgrade,one which is urgently needed.Looking at the pictures the first,business and premier with swiveling seats look good and even standard class has a distinct ambience with good leg room.This upgrade will provide a fleet of coaches that will fit well with the new franchise and also if cascaded onto other routes .With the class 91,s also receiving a deep rebuild and an extra pantograph surely this will stop the awful IEP being foisted on the ECML .This route really needs to be upgraded and speeds raised ,why not 140mph as origonaly intended.The catenary would have to be rebuilt from the poor quality that it is now and some curves and junctions rebuilt.If this was carried out the ECML would also obiviate the need for HS2 ,although thats another story!
 

AndyLandy

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2011
Messages
1,323
Location
Southampton, UK
surely this will stop the awful IEP being foisted on the ECML .
Given that nobody has yet seen an IEP, how can you know it will be awful? :idea:

This route really needs to be upgraded and speeds raised ,why not 140mph as origonaly intended.The catenary would have to be rebuilt from the poor quality that it is now and some curves and junctions rebuilt.

...and implementation of in-cab signalling on all stock running on the line, and probably moving block too. Personally, I'm skeptical that we'll see anything other than HSx lines faster than 125mph for quite some time.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,082
Location
Redcar
At last the MK 4 stock is to get a decent interior upgrade,one which is urgently needed.

The Mallard refurbishment wasn't 'decent'?

With the class 91,s also receiving a deep rebuild and an extra pantograph surely this will stop the awful IEP being foisted on the ECML.

Seeing as the initial batch of IEP is intended to replace only the HSTs I'm not sure how this can stop IEP on the ECML?
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
At last the MK 4 stock is to get a decent interior upgrade,one which is urgently needed.Looking at the pictures the first,business and premier with swiveling seats look good and even standard class has a distinct ambience with good leg room.This upgrade will provide a fleet of coaches that will fit well with the new franchise and also if cascaded onto other routes.
The Mallard refurbishment interiors are still relatively new and in my experience are always clean. In my opinion there is no way that the Mallard refurbishment can be improved upon.

This route really needs to be upgraded and speeds raised ,why not 140mph as origonaly intended.The catenary would have to be rebuilt from the poor quality that it is now and some curves and junctions rebuilt.
140mph running would require the installtion of in-cab signalling, would reduce the number of paths available for local, commuter and freight trains and would only cut the London to Edinburgh journey time by little more than ten minutes(I can't remember the exact figure) compared to the fastest time possible in regular service at 125mph.
If this was carried out the ECML would also obiviate the need for HS2 ,although thats another story!
Despite the fact that HS2 is being built primarily to relieve demand on the southern stretch of the West Coast main line, will eventually serve both East and West Coast destinations, and without building considerable stretches of new alignment on the ECML increasing line speeds on the route would only serve to reduce the capacity of the ECML?
 

DaveNewcastle

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2007
Messages
7,387
Location
Newcastle (unless I'm out)
At last the MK 4 stock is to get a decent interior upgrade,one which is urgently needed.
Eh?

Maybe some carpets are getting beyond just another clean and a few tables are damaged, but the interior is more than acceptable (esp when compared to many other types) and I can only think that a real 'upgrade' is necessary to the layout of the toilets' hand-wash, soap dispenser, towel dispenser and bin.
The Mallard refurbishment wasn't 'decent'?
Quite!
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,902
Location
Fenny Stratford
Given that nobody has yet seen an IEP, how can you know it will be awful? :idea:

Past performance? Having a brain? feeling in my bones? It WILL be terrible to ride on as a passenger.

At last the MK 4 stock is to get a decent interior upgrade,one which is urgently needed.Looking at the pictures the first,business and premier with swiveling seats look good and even standard class has a distinct ambience with good leg room.This upgrade will provide a fleet of coaches that will fit well with the new franchise and also if cascaded onto other routes .With the class 91,s also receiving a deep rebuild and an extra pantograph surely this will stop the awful IEP being foisted on the ECML .This route really needs to be upgraded and speeds raised ,why not 140mph as origonaly intended.The catenary would have to be rebuilt from the poor quality that it is now and some curves and junctions rebuilt.If this was carried out the ECML would also obiviate the need for HS2 ,although thats another story!


I think the Mallard refurb is one of the best. I have no problems with it. It is very good and comfortable.

As for the rest :roll: Have we the cash to rebuild the entire ECML?
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,567
Location
Macclesfield
Past performance?
Past performance based on what? The nearest precedent that we have in this country for a high speed train made by Hitachi is the class 395, which I think are very good trains. Yet still, how can you have "past performance" from a product that has not yet been built?
 

shaun

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2009
Messages
207

I think somebody is having a joke here! My god,what awful seats (if you can even call them seats)! The standard class ones look like bus seats with leather. We have buses up here in the Midlands called 'Black Diamonds', this is pretty similar to what they look like inside...in fact worse! Are they really considering this, it must be a joke?!!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I'd prefer different seats in the Mallard, really can't get comfortable in them..

They're fairly comfortable,not great...but these?!
 
Last edited:

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,253
A concept animation of the Mark 4 rebuild, showing the galley in the DVT as well as the buisness class, first class, standard class and premier class.

http://www.eversholtrail.co.uk/MKIV.html

Looks O.K. in my opinion, but not great. Hopefully the seats can be more aligned to the windows though. And as for premier class... It is totally unnecessary and a complete waste of space.
 
Last edited:

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
7,217
Location
UK
Premier class? What is that supposed to be? (Like I know what it is, but who is it marketed for, and is it the best used of capacity. Same thing as with business class.

The first class seats look good, but If there is any +2 airline seats they might be claustrophobic. Unfortunately there does seem to be an obsession with Privacy, even in first class, where it is not needed in (what is supposed to be) spacious first class.
 
Last edited:

43074

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Messages
2,253
Premier class? What is that supposed to be? (Like I know what it is, but who is it marketed for, and is it the best used of capacity. Same thing as with business class.

The first class seats look good, but If there is any +2 airline seats they might be claustrophobic. Unfortunately there does seem to be an obsession with Privacy, even in first class, where it is not needed in (what is supposed to be) spacious first class.

It's clearly aimed at the fat cats who run our society, and those millionaires prepared to put their money where their mouth is. Consisting of 1+1 seating that reclines and swivels to suit your preferred direction of travel, it is amongst the poorest use of capacity possible. No tables though, making it absolutely pointless IMO :roll: .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top