Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Well because the six main wheels were driven like a GWR pannier but it had an extra set of undriven supporting wheels between two of the driven ones. The continental system would work but can't see how Whyte could do it.
Happens all the time in Kidbrooke tunnel on the up where you get held at the London end tunnel mouth to allow an up Gillingham semi fast to go into Blackheath.
I think this other Belgian steam oddity (and boy there were plenty of them) was that 0-6-0 Pannier which had an extra set of supporting wheels put between a pair of the driving wheels. It was something to do with a weight limit on the route it was used on.
It is absolutely their business. They are as much the eyes and ears of the railway as anyone else and as part of their training they are told to report suspicious activity.
Ahh this must be this contraption- basically a pair of Crosti monsters back to back.
http://www.douglas-self.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/francocrosti/francocrosti.htm#b
It was the Queens golden jubilee that year and there was a big flypast that June. I wonder if this was part of those celebrations and it was so loud because it was a VC10 tanker?
In the case of Grove Park - Bromley North a toilet will need to be orovided
I think the cop out to be DDA compliant is to have announcements and CIS displays on platforms telling which part of the train has a disabled toilet (or not)
Does anyone know if the 466's will have the DDA compliant toilet mod done? -can only think of two routes they are used on as a lone unit and they would ideally have a 465 on if possible.
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.