Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Thank you. I missed that it was Sunday.
However I'm not sure what the benefit is of "keeping the trains in order" in this instance. Wouldn't it be better to keep the one waiting that is already stationary rather than stop one already in motion? The alternative would be an arrival at Chesham...
To answer my question, the Chesham service is timetabled to depart C&L at 21:36.5, well in front of the Chiltern service which passes 6 minutes later.
Why the Chiltern is being delayed for the last service of the day to a single station is beyond me. Anyway, another matter I suppose.
I know it's not necessarily relevant here, but why is a branch line move being signalled in front on the up main line. Overall delay of stopping the Chiltern train as opposed to waiting for it to pass before signalling the Chesham train must be material.
Given the Chiltern train was running...
Those Paddington pics (thanks 59cos). It looks like heavy scaffolding. I struggle to understand why the current OHLE hasn't just melted away under the current weather.
Obviously not. That is a Boeing. On a commercial (not test) flight. In a year before A380 was even conceived.
As I said, the post by 3141 is utter nonsense.
Thanks for this post. This all seems to be a haphazard implementation.
What is a "AT wire" please? And surely these two stations have been operating HEX and HConn for years....so why the need to implement more here?
Thanks
I can assure you that a bank clerk would lose their job over this.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
BTW free travel on National Rail is not a perk of being a Police Officer. Those of you providing free travel to them on production of a Warrant Card need to revise your behaviour...
Not by using the human eye straight down the side of a straight train (I agree that it does not apply at Hanwell)? Are you saying that 387s can ONLY be officially safely deployed if the on-board CCTVs are used, or someone else's eyeball ?
We are aware of an issue with emails from the Forum to Microsoft-based email accounts (hotmail/outlook/live.com email addresses). This is being looked into currently, thanks for your patience meanwhile.