• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 810 for East Midlands Railway Construction/Introduction Updates

Toby268

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2022
Messages
213
Location
Glasgow
On 810014 at the moment, all seems normal in my carriage, unit arrived on time (well, on time in UK terms, think was a couple mins late at most), no glaring issues like bad air con or PA systems, nothing but a dodgy screen which I have attached, hurt not showing the proper text (1 of 2 screens working though in the carriage so not an issue really, both monitor style screens are working too which is a first for me), quite quiet too.

View attachment 209083View attachment 209084
Avanti have the same issues with the scrolling screens. No urgency to fix them, some have been like it since new.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dave61

Member
Joined
8 Mar 2026
Messages
152
Location
Long Eaton
I saw the same in coach D on 810012 last weekend, hardly inspiring given how new they are...
Probably waiting for the 20 minute systems reboot , kind of like when your home computer goes all wonky when it and the screen get all confused and needs a reboot
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,983
Location
Surrey
Given not too many negative reports on here over 810 performance over the last week maybe an indication that things maybe at least stabilised now. Maybe with the reduced timetable they should be pushing on with getting more 810s into traffic whilst they still have enough 222s to act as standby.
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,850
Location
Northampton
Avanti have the same issues with the scrolling screens. No urgency to fix them, some have been like it since new.

Theyse trains have all been 'accepted into service', so Hitachi have no reason or motivation to get them to work properly - they've got the money.
See also (810 ) interior sliding doors that stay open, lavatories that don't work for long, extremely noisy aircond fans, grinding vibration during acceleration.
We'll just have to accept these as situation normal ...
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,303
Theyse trains have all been 'accepted into service', so Hitachi have no reason or motivation to get them to work properly - they've got the money.
they have paid out of £50 million in payments for late delivery.

They will also be fined daily for failure to provide a set for a diagram, fined for a set which fails in service and fined for sending a train into service that has faults.

So yes they have been paid for the accepted trains, but to say they have no motivation is not true.

Think also of the reputational damage this is doing to Hitachi, it is showing them in a very bad light.

If they want to win future orders it is in Hitachis interest to to get a grip of the EMR fleet and get them to the level that they should have been operating at.
 

DaveyJones

Member
Joined
12 Mar 2023
Messages
217
Location
UK
Theyse trains have all been 'accepted into service', so Hitachi have no reason or motivation to get them to work properly - they've got the money.
See also (810 ) interior sliding doors that stay open, lavatories that don't work for long, extremely noisy aircond fans, grinding vibration during acceleration.
We'll just have to accept these as situation normal ...
Surely as the Manufacturer / Maintainer (in some cases) there must be penalty clauses for faults not being fixed?
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,428
They will also be fined daily for failure to provide a set for a diagram, fined for a set which fails in service and fined for sending a train into service that has faults.
Is this definitely the case? I know with the IEP provided units it is, but I was under the impression that with EMR it's a standard arrangement, with EMR leasing the stock and maintaining it, albeit they've outsourced the maintenance to another company - Hitachi at the moment. So if stock isn't available or fails, it's no different to if a 222, 170 or 158 had the same problem.

The IEP way of doing things only really works if the organisation being penalised because of issues is also the lesser and gets to specify the amount of stock built, which we know isn't the case with EMR.
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,303
Is this definitely the case? I know with the IEP provided units it is, but I was under the impression that with EMR it's a standard arrangement, with EMR leasing the stock and maintaining it, albeit they've outsourced the maintenance to another company - Hitachi at the moment. So if stock isn't available or fails, it's no different to if a 222, 170 or 158 had the same problem.

The IEP way of doing things only really works if the organisation being penalised because of issues is also the lesser and gets to specify the amount of stock built, which we know isn't the case with EMR.
I just assumed what I wrote would be the case, but even still if they have out sourced maintenance to hitachi, EMR will issue them with a daily requirement of units. If that is not achieved then Hitachi have failed on there side.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

810017 Merchant Park to Long Marston this morning.
 
Last edited:

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
8,885
810018 appears to have suffered a couple of days of issues culminating in failure this morning filling East Mids Parkway with smoke this morning with dragging brakes. Bit of a PR gift to the RMT who are circulating the video around social media.
 

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,692
Location
Derby
810018 has disgraced itself at East Midlands Parkway this morning on 1F07, with smoke coming from one of the bogies. Links to the video from the RMT on Facebook and Twitter


 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
521
Location
Essex
810018 has disgraced itself at East Midlands Parkway this morning on 1F07, with smoke coming from one of the bogies. Links to the video from the RMT on Facebook and Twitter



It would be interesting to know what indications the driver would have had with this if it was dragging brakes, at GWR there have been a few brake issues but never seen one smoke like this and normally they have been picked up by a HABD
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,850
Location
Northampton
they have paid out of £50 million in payments for late delivery.

They will also be fined daily for failure to provide a set for a diagram, fined for a set which fails in service and fined for sending a train into service that has faults.

So yes they have been paid for the accepted trains, but to say they have no motivation is not true.

Think also of the reputational damage this is doing to Hitachi, it is showing them in a very bad light.

If they want to win future orders it is in Hitachis interest to to get a grip of the EMR fleet and get them to the level that they should have been operating at.
My bold

But are the faults that count only ones that affect it moving and being safe doing so?

My experience, travelling in the CO, was anecdotal I know. The sliding intermediate door was open and when the (friendly) Hitachi fitter passed I asked him about it. After some adjustment, he made it close. The first time it opened, it stayed open again. When I asked him about the grinding heavy vibration as it pulled away from a stop he said 'that's the traction motors'. Neither suggested a solution was in sight or even regarded as required.

Hitachi, in common with other suppliers nationally, have a reputation so low that I wouldn't buy even a paper clip from them. But that's irrelevant to Hitachi as I have no say in whether they are chosen. And wasn't Hitachi's reputation bad - cracking, amongst other things - when the 810s were ordered?
 

222001

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2006
Messages
837
Location
Chesterfield
Hitachi, in common with other suppliers nationally, have a reputation so low that I wouldn't buy even a paper clip from them. But that's irrelevant to Hitachi as I have no say in whether they are chosen. And wasn't Hitachi's reputation bad - cracking, amongst other things - when the 810s were ordered?
They were ordered in July 2019, and the cracking issue was some point during Covid I believe?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
10,609
Location
Hampshire
They were ordered in July 2019, and the cracking issue was some point during Covid I believe?
Correct, the 810s would have been planned during the bidding phase and contracts signed with Hitachi upon being confirmed as Franchise winner.

The cracking issue came to light during April 2021, so there’s little way that Hitachi would have known about it until the 800s had spent a few years hammering up and down the GWML and ECML. Their choice of Aluminium and bracket design however…
 

midland1

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
445
Location
wigston
It would be interesting to know what indications the driver would have had with this if it was dragging brakes, at GWR there have been a few brake issues but never seen one smoke like this and normally they have been picked up by a HABD
Realtimes Trains says train cancelled due to problem with traction equipment, but this may not be true.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,376
Location
Lichfield
810018 appears to have suffered a couple of days of issues culminating in failure this morning filling East Mids Parkway with smoke this morning with dragging brakes. Bit of a PR gift to the RMT who are circulating the video around social media.

I've seen a few posts myself, the RMT are all over it.

What is surprising is how quite Aslef appear to be on the subject.
 

1D54

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2019
Messages
1,463
Until It leaves factory, no.
Guess would be 021 or 023.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Path has auto activated. Usually an indicator that it will not run.
Happy to be proved wrong.
Operated today with 017.
 

InTheEastMids

Established Member
Joined
31 Jan 2016
Messages
1,382
The cracking issue came to light during April 2021, so there’s little way that Hitachi would have known about it until the 800s had spent a few years hammering up and down the GWML and ECML. Their choice of Aluminium and bracket design however…
There was something (and don't ask me to find it!) on here probably 150 pages ago that suggests Hitachi changed possibly the design but definitely the materials (grade of aluminium) to avoid the 810s having the same problems as other derivatives.

I've seen a few posts myself, the RMT are all over it.
Presumably RMT would prefer that brakes failed in the "released" position rather than "applied"? <(

And wasn't Hitachi's reputation bad - cracking, amongst other things - when the 810s were ordered?
Not wishing to drag the discussion off topic, and this point has certainly been made before, but without the clarity of hindsight, a souped-up Cl800 looked a lot more deliverable in 2019 than an unproven bimode 125mph Aventra, and a Stadler option that would have needed a 60% increase in output from the power pod(s) without too much compromise on passenger capacity.

810017 Merchant Park to Long Marston this morning.
Did I miss this, or has there been any information on the nature of work that is going to be done at Long Marston?
Has it been confirmed who has been contracted to do the work?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,303
Did I miss this, or has there been any information on the nature of work that is going to be done at Long Marston?
Has it been confirmed who has been contracted to do the work?
I thought it was for testing of the units
 

leomartin125

Member
Joined
15 Nov 2015
Messages
1,058
Location
North West
810018 has disgraced itself at East Midlands Parkway this morning on 1F07, with smoke coming from one of the bogies. Links to the video from the RMT on Facebook and Twitter



I thought we had a steam ban on at the moment?
 

fishwomp

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2020
Messages
1,271
Location
milton keynes
I've seen a few posts myself, the RMT are all over it.

What is surprising is how quite Aslef appear to be on the subject.
It strikes me as unhelpful. They are telling the public the railway is unsafe - whereas I would expect ORR, RSSB, and the HSE to be all over this if that were the case.

It'd also be a bit early to be scoring points.. not knowing the reason for this. Is maintenance and passing out stock as good to go (Etches Park, right?) something that another RMT (TUPE'd over from previous employments) member would have been responsible for.. - I've only seen this as a conductor strike so far, not a maintenance one..? If they are under pressure to cut corners, we should be told..
 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
521
Location
Essex
Can't see how all that smoke is dragging brakes surely something engine or coolant wise

I’ve seen information stating that brakes were isolated on that vehicle before it proceeded ECS, doesn’t look like coolant to me, far too Smokey rather than steamy, what would be interesting to know is how far it had been driven like that as those brakes can take a lot of abuse
 

Merle Haggard

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2019
Messages
3,850
Location
Northampton
I’ve seen information stating that brakes were isolated on that vehicle before it proceeded ECS, doesn’t look like coolant to me, far too Smokey rather than steamy, what would be interesting to know is how far it had been driven like that as those brakes can take a lot of abuse

It ran ECS Etches Park to Leicester and then ran in passenger service from there to Etches Park. Nothing noticeable at Leicester or Loughborough, presumably, so not that far
Having once travelled in a BCK with the handbrake on fully on departure, the ride of a coach with the wheels locked is noticeably different and there are other symptoms, so it's surprising to me that on-board staff would not notice.
 
Joined
20 Apr 2009
Messages
45
I’ve seen information stating that brakes were isolated on that vehicle before it proceeded ECS, doesn’t look like coolant to me, far too Smokey rather than steamy, what would be interesting to know is how far it had been driven like that as those brakes can take a lot of abuse
From remote monitoring, 810018 seemed to be accelerating on normal full unrestricted power from all four engines when pulling away northbound from Loughborough (the station call before the incident).
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,235
I thought this too. There was talk somewhere of Hitachi being given their marching orders from Old Dalby, not sure how true that is though
Having a loop test track at Long Marston is probably far more useful for iterative fault finding that is now Hitachi's main focus (all certification work done) as it is easier to clock up mileage without the driver needing to change ends every 10 mins. The workshop facilities at Long Marston may also better suit Hitachi's current needs compared to those Old Dalby.
They may be leaving voluntarily and Porterbrook might want an early successful casestudy for their new facility.
 

jfowkes

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2017
Messages
1,266
Having a loop test track at Long Marston is probably far more useful for iterative fault finding that is now Hitachi's main focus (all certification work done) as it is easier to clock up mileage without the driver needing to change ends every 10 mins.
Can they really gun the engines and get a decent speed up at Long Marston? I wonder if the issue is one that running at 50mph round the Long Marston loop just won't find and that you need to drive it like you would on the mainline. Especially since one known issue with the 810s is heat management.

EDIT: This is all idle speculation on my part, I have no knowledge or any axe to grind,
 

Top