• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Transpennine Route Upgrade and Electrification updates

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,978
Location
Surrey
Ben Elias has released another Drivers Eye View of the full route:


(Video of New Measurement Train drive from York to Manchester)
Wow they've made monumental progress down from Church Fenton towards Neville Hill must be achieving a good unit rate. Is the intention to liven it up further and extend TPEs working limit for the 802s as well as acting as diversionary route for LNER.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,377
Location
Taunton or Kent
Wow they've made monumental progress down from Church Fenton towards Neville Hill must be achieving a good unit rate. Is the intention to liven it up further and extend TPEs working limit for the 802s as well as acting as diversionary route for LNER.
This is what I'm wondering. From what I can tell completing the bridge replacement at Church Fenton and installing the last bit of OHLE in the area after might be enough to make OHLE live all the way to Micklefield. Beyond there to Neville Hill could be soon after, however the remodelling at the latter presumably makes continuous electrification from York-Leeds a while off still.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,661
Wires have appeared overnight through Garforth. Either that or they happened another day and I just didn't notice yesterday.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
This is what I'm wondering. From what I can tell completing the bridge replacement at Church Fenton and installing the last bit of OHLE in the area after might be enough to make OHLE live all the way to Micklefield.
The OHLE will still need the final tie-in to Church Fenton and associated signalling/ECR changes, which is likely to take place at either Christmas or Easter to facilitate a long enough possession.
Beyond there to Neville Hill could be soon after, however the remodelling at the latter presumably makes continuous electrification from York-Leeds a while off still.
It's been consistently posted that Neville Hill is waiting for the area to be reconfigured, and will be the last part of York-Leeds. To quote from the Enhancements Delivery Plan:
The scheme requires a major closure of the Neville Hill Depot in order to deliver this work, so a programme of temporary depot facilitation is required to enable.
Also relevant for the final date of Neville Hill Commissioning is from the EDP: the Entry into Service of TRU Segments E234 Leeds - Church Fenton (Line Speed, Electrification and Level Crossing Closures) is on-target for April 2030.

However, Church Fenton - Cross Gates (or some part thereof) may well come sooner - If we look at Section 7 of the 2026/27 Engineering access statement, there is a 'presumed christmas shutdown' for Leeds-Church Fenton for the TRU East OLE Commissioning 24-26 December 2026. (see p.116).
 
Last edited:

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,853
Location
Beeston (Notts)
The OHLE will still need the final tie-in to Church Fenton and associated signalling/ECR changes, which is likely to take place at either Christmas or Easter to facilitate a long enough possession.

It's been consistently posted that Neville Hill is waiting for the area to be reconfigured, and will be the last part of York-Leeds. To quote from the Enhancements Delivery Plan:

Also relevant from the EDP is that the Entry into Service of TRU Segments E234 Leeds - Church Fenton (Line Speed, Electrification and Level Crossing Closures) is on-target for April 2030.

If we look at Section 7 of the 2026/27 Engineering access statement, there is a 'presumed christmas shutdown' for Leeds-Church Fenton for the TRU East OLE Commissioning 24-26 December 2026. (see p.116).
The April 2030 part to me reads as showing the whole thing from Leeds to Church Fenton, and doesn't delve into the specifics, so a temporary extension of the electrified area to, say, Cross Gates doesn't feel outwith the realm of possibility.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
The April 2030 part to me reads as showing the whole thing from Leeds to Church Fenton, and doesn't delve into the specifics, so a temporary extension of the electrified area to, say, Cross Gates doesn't feel outwith the realm of possibility.
Agree, that part was aimed more at the issue of Neville Hill Depot, sorry I should have been clearer. The dates given are for completion of all work, many other schemes (including parts of TRU) have delivered individual elements well ahead of the EDP dates. The Section 7 possession in particular suggests that there will be some extension of the live wires sooner than April 2030.

I have now edited my post to hopefully clarify.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,897
Location
Mold, Clwyd
For a partial extension of electric working south/west of Church Fenton there will have to be switching points (APCO) installed.
So it depends if this is included in the Christmas 2026 work.
It's the start of the next big Huddersfield shutdown too, extending through January 2027.
 

Monkeyhead

Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
90
I understand the complexity around the Neville Hill work, but it feels like a real shame that we can’t get full Leeds - York electrification for another 4 years, when there seems to be tons of emu‘s sitting around and Northern continue to have stock shortages and keep putting 2 carriage trains on rush hour services. Will be going yo Garforth on Thursday so look forward to seeing the progress
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
There seems to have been a bit of a ramping up of work in the Fall Lane area of Dewsbury lately. Only trouble is it means navigating that area as a pedestrian or cyclist (it's the official diversion for the Spen Valley Greenway, diverted due to Baker Viaduct construction) is a bit of a nightmare, the sooner the regular route's open the better.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
There seems to have been a bit of a ramping up of work in the Fall Lane area of Dewsbury lately. Only trouble is it means navigating that area as a pedestrian or cyclist (it's the official diversion for the Spen Valley Greenway, diverted due to Baker Viaduct construction) is a bit of a nightmare, the sooner the regular route's open the better.
Be interesting to see what they actually do there, (Thornhill Rd Bridge), if they’re realigning the relatively new bridge for a straighter connection between existing and new routes it could need a relatively small bit of embankment work either side, and altered abutments? Will they be able to use the existing bridge spans, so will need a site cleared to rig one of those massive cranes?
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
Be interesting to see what they actually do there, (Thornhill Rd Bridge), if they’re realigning the relatively new bridge for a straighter connection between existing and new routes it could need a relatively small bit of embankment work either side, and altered abutments? Will they be able to use the existing bridge spans, so will need a site cleared to rig one of those massive cranes?

There's a diagram of the plans HERE . I've heard different things about the bridge, one that there's going to be a new one built or they'll reuse the 'newish' one. One thing's for sure, there's going to be some tight bends on a steep hill when the road's moved northwest to accommodate the line doing the same.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
There's a diagram of the plans HERE . I've heard different things about the bridge, one that there's going to be a new one built or they'll reuse the 'newish' one. One thing's for sure, there's going to be some tight bends on a steep hill when the road's moved northwest to accommodate the line doing the same.
Thanks for that, my searching failed trying to find it… :oops: I did try the local planning site as well, but no joy there.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
Im surprised as one of the recent "On track with Tim" Youtubes clearly shows the trackbed of the new curve started.
K
Yes but the Neville Hill block can't happen until the new depot at Shipley is open. A recent Sarah Bell video shows they are working vigorously at that but are still at the earthmoving stage.

Latest views of new TRU train depot on unexpectedly dramatic day in Shipley

The Transpennine Route Upgrade involves the building of a new train depot in Shipley, in the Bradford district of West Yorkshire. The depot will service Northern's fleet of electric trains that run on the nearby Airedale and Wharfedale railway lines. This video shows the latest from the construction process, on a day when a large fire broke out nearby
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wilsontown

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2012
Messages
141
Cross Gates seems to have acquired an "OFF" indicator on the Down platform. Not sure why, but presume there must be a reason.
 

wilsontown

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2012
Messages
141
Possibly the conductor's view of the platform starting signal may become obstructed by a new overhead line stanchion.
I did think that, but didn't jump out to check how it looks...

I wonder if there might also be a sighting issue for drivers if they're approaching that signal at red on trains that don't stop there.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,884
Cross Gates seems to have acquired an "OFF" indicator on the Down platform. Not sure why, but presume there must be a reason.
It was installed Xmas 2025 to meet current sighting standards for the platform starting signal.

Bridges around East Leeds are now being fitted with yellow signs warning of overhead live wires which suggests livening of the section as far as Cross Gates will be sooner rather than later.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I wonder if there might also be a sighting issue for drivers if they're approaching that signal at red on trains that don't stop there.
Drivers don't generally use OFF indicators, they're aimed at dispatch only. If it was a sighting issue for drivers a banner repeater would be provided.
 

wilsontown

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2012
Messages
141
It was installed Xmas 2025 to meet current sighting standards for the platform starting signal.

Bridges around East Leeds are now being fitted with yellow signs warning of overhead live wires which suggests livening of the section as far as Cross Gates will be sooner rather than later.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Drivers don't generally use OFF indicators, they're aimed at dispatch only. If it was a sighting issue for drivers a banner repeater would be provided.
Thanks for this, I must have gone past it dozens of times and not noticed until today.

I get that the OFF indicator isn't there for drivers, but presumably they can use it if they can actually see it properly - it must be interlocked with the signal? I'm sure I've seen this with freights coming into York on a red - OFF indicator lights up and they take power although the signal couldn't have been in sight.
 

1D53

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2006
Messages
2,884
Yeah drivers can use it, it's principally for dispatch though. Sighting of the platform starting signal for drivers is actually decent from a reasonably good distance back.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,856
Location
west yorkshire
There's a diagram of the plans HERE . I've heard different things about the bridge, one that there's going to be a new one built or they'll reuse the 'newish' one. One thing's for sure, there's going to be some tight bends on a steep hill when the road's moved northwest to accommodate the line doing the same.
Great job searching through the jungle of planning documents which are supposed to be public.
I tried unsuccessfully to find one of whatever there doing to the Thornhill Road bridge.
K
 

Spartacus

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
3,806
Great job searching through the jungle of planning documents which are supposed to be public.
I tried unsuccessfully to find one of whatever there doing to the Thornhill Road bridge.
K

Kirklees' site which they came through is terrible for navigating, Google worked though!

You might find what you're looking for here:

 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,856
Location
west yorkshire
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,227
Thankyou. Lots of interesting info RE the route and links to derailed drawings when you scroll down the document.
One of the several Thornhill Road ones is at :- https://sacuksprodnrdigital0001.blob.core.windows.net/twao-huddersfield-westtown/Huddersfield to Westtown (Dewsbury)/02 TWAO Application Documents/NR13 Planning Drawing -
 K


%20B6117%20Fall%20Lane,%20Thornhill%20Road%20(MDL1-9)%20-%20Cross%20Section.pdf
You appear to have broken that link, has it got an accidental ‘K’ messing it up?
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
8,144
Location
Leeds
One thing I've noticed is that the replacement Calder Road bridge as built seems to be further east, closer to the old bridge that it is replacing, than shown on any plans I've seen.

Maybe this is a change that was made during the public inquiry into the TWAO application. Published plans tend to be as submitted at the time of the original application.
 

Top