If the transport bosses are determined enough, it doesn't matter about growing usage, they will close regardless. I seem to remember a couple of Far North line stations were mentioned, I can see them as being opposed due to the small communities they serve, but places like Golf St (also proposed for closure) do have several alternative stations and transport around them, so they, I suspect, would be more likely to go.
Can anyone provide a link (or a link to a link, etc) that details said proposal please?
7.11 We do not intend to reduce the size of the Scottish rail network, or reduce the number of stations, but we are considering whether it would be possible to re-configure the network by reviewing the location of stations. We would welcome views on what locations may be more appropriate for stations and which current stations are no longer required. Overall, we are considering the location of stations that could offer the greatest benefits to Scotland.
It seems sensible to look at the locations of stations. Whereas stations may once have been sited in a convenient place that may have changed over the years, perhaps due to housing developments, or the decline of heavy industry.
It would be a bit daft to be closing stations when the general idea is to encourage people to use public transport. But if politicians are involved I suppose anything could happen.
Straying south of the border, you only need to see in the Manchester area, what passenger and freight traffic Ashburys station used to serve at one time with all the now-gone heavy engineering industry of East Manchester. You have made a very valid point here about how things can change over a period of time.
I was conscious of the GM area when I wrote my post. I am sure there are other areas as well - Middlesbrough is one that comes to mind, but I can't remember the exact details, was there a station just east of the city that was closed relatively recently?
I am not local, but Grangetown and Cargo Fleet do appear on Wikipedia as being closed in 1991 and 1990, respectively. These were small stations either side of South Bank, which is open, on the Tees Valley Line. Both stations were east of Middlesbrough.
On the Scottish stations topic, do you think they might be able to keep Golf Street and Barry Links open just for the fun of it? I mean, there must be at least a little revenue to be made from hardcore railway enthusiasts who like to visit obscure locations. Altnabreac station is apparently used almost exclusively by such people.![]()
On the Scottish stations topic, do you think they might be able to keep Golf Street and Barry Links open just for the fun of it? I mean, there must be at least a little revenue to be made from hardcore railway enthusiasts who like to visit obscure locations. Altnabreac station is apparently used almost exclusively by such people.![]()
I spoke with Keith Brown MSP, Transport Minister, yesterday - this was mentioned by one of my colleagues during the meeting. He claims that the list of (nine) stations came from someone who requested a list of stations within one mile of another.
He also says that he won't rule out anything, since it could be liable to challenge if he did, and that he is not proposing the closure of any stations - it is simply a consultation.
Your pal should simply rule it out now and read the riot act to Transport Scotland/Network Rail, "read my lips NO CLOSURES"!
The "savings" would be ZERO no matter what sums Network Rail could conjure out of thin air, I don't imagine Keith Brown is an idiot so he will know fine well that the political cost would vastly outweigh any imaginary savings.
Also this sends out a totally negative message, it doesn't matter that theres another station round the corner or it's used by 1 punter a week, the lines been drawn - rail closures are so last century!
He's not my pal, I would have asked him other questions if it weren't for the fact I was representing an non-party political organisation at the time!