• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Do You Agree With Ticket Barriers?

Do you agree with ticket barriers?

  • Yes, they are a good idea everywhere

    Votes: 55 35.7%
  • Yes, they are a good idea, but only in suburban/tube networks

    Votes: 74 48.1%
  • No

    Votes: 25 16.2%

  • Total voters
    154
Status
Not open for further replies.

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
As long as ATGs/manual gatelines are used effectively together with on board checks then it's fine, the problems start when ATGs are introduced to stations but there's a shortage of staff to man them properly as that leads to ticket evasion.

There's very little point in gating every station in the UK but the busier stations ought to be, see my example of York and Bristol Temple Meads as a worthwhile example.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mex

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2009
Messages
64
I think ticket barriers are great.

Especially the one at Glasgow Queen St which has a nice long think about whether to accept my season ticket, and then changes its mind when I'm partly through it, shoving me back into the queue of people behind me.

How we all laughed.
 

cuccir

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
3,695
They are also not the only solution, they only work in parallel with effective on train checks, and good trainin gfor those staffing the gateline... I don't find using barriers much of a problem, except where the design of the station really precludes the installation of sufficient barriers.

These are pretty much the reasons that I voted for 'only commuter lines'.

Barriers work best where:
* The distance between stations relative to the train length or busyness prevents on-board guards or RPIs from being able to reliably check tickets
* There is only one TOC
* There are fewer platforms

I don't think, for example, that a station such as Newcastle should really have them. They don't stop people with an XC ticket getting on to an East Coast train. They don't stop people who have travelled a distance without having their ticket checked, claiming that they boarded a northern rail train at an unstaffed station - and thus getting discounts or a cheaper fare. They cut the station facilities in half. They often mean that an entire HST's worth of passengers has to disembark via three or four narrow gates.

So they are a good tool. But I don't think that large interchange stations should have them.
 

exile

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2011
Messages
1,342
But surely the ticket remains valid to the point you get off the train.... so are you actually travelling with an invalid ticket?
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,306
What barriers do do well though is ensure people who were jut going to jump on the train from staffed stations and pay if the guard comes round have tickets. This means the guard has more time to check tickets/railcards properly and more time to sell tickets from unstaffed stations. It isn't uncommon on the Buxton line for example for a guard to still be selling tickets from Manchester stations 25 minutes into the journey and they are unable to get to those who boarded at unstaffed stations because they are still selling tickets to people who already should have them.
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
These are pretty much the reasons that I voted for 'only commuter lines'.

Barriers work best where:
* The distance between stations relative to the train length or busyness prevents on-board guards or RPIs from being able to reliably check tickets
* There is only one TOC
* There are fewer platforms

I don't think, for example, that a station such as Newcastle should really have them. They don't stop people with an XC ticket getting on to an East Coast train. They don't stop people who have travelled a distance without having their ticket checked, claiming that they boarded a northern rail train at an unstaffed station - and thus getting discounts or a cheaper fare. They cut the station facilities in half. They often mean that an entire HST's worth of passengers has to disembark via three or four narrow gates.

So they are a good tool. But I don't think that large interchange stations should have them.

Indeed. Newcastle probably counts as one of the stations that should not have automatic barriers, but there are other stations that deal with both long distance travellers, people changing traisn and short distance commuter traffic where barriers can be justified.

I haven't been to Newcastle since the barriers went in, but I cna imgaine that there may not be the space there for sufficient numbers to prevent congestion. At other busy stations, though, there is plenty of room - Leeds is an example. There are plenty of gates and during a recent four day stay involving a lot of train travel, I saw hardly any congestion.

Cardiff Central, on the other hand, does not have enough gates and when crowds build people are often just waved through, which rather negates the point of them in the first place.
 

davelew99

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2011
Messages
65
I've remembered the other reason why i dislike barriers -

They can ruin the passenger flow of a station - Birkenhead Hamilton Sq is clearly designed to have 'in' and 'out' doors on the lifts - in through the front, out through the back.

The back doors at ground level now no longer open and i suspect the street entrance is only open for fire regs or similar. There is also a 'Do not trespass, penalty £1000' notice on this entrance too.

At peak times you're battling the flow of people coming the other way. Going out the back way would reduce footfall past the shop too which wouldn't be a good idea commercially.
 

gary47

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2011
Messages
48
They could do with them at new st to stop the beggars getting onto the platforms where they check the tickets is not always manned and I have complained about them before also once I was sitting on a train there and a beggar got on at 1 end and walked all the way down the train asking people for money and got off at other end if you had barriers you wouldn't get this problem
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
They could do with them at new st to stop the beggars getting onto the platforms where they check the tickets is not always manned and I have complained about them before also once I was sitting on a train there and a beggar got on at 1 end and walked all the way down the train asking people for money and got off at other end if you had barriers you wouldn't get this problem

He could just use the lift instead...
 

ChathillMan

Member
Joined
13 Sep 2010
Messages
265
I think barriers are needed however the true benefit will be found when the entire rail network goes 'smart' and you just 'touch in and out' , at present we are left waiting ages for the ticket to go through *looks at Newcastle ticket barriers*
 

Firestarter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2009
Messages
555
Certainly Bedford already is - there is a member of FCC staff (usually two) there until the station closes, in addition to the dispatchers.

I would assume the same at Luton, due to the station layout - not so sure about Leagrave or St Albans - in the case of the former, it perhaps doesn't get enough use in the evenings to warrant barriers being in use, but the latter certainly does!

I didn't know Bedford has revenue staff through out the night.
 
Joined
2 Jun 2009
Messages
1,135
Location
North London
I find ticket barriers acceptable at stations provided that:

  • all the trains serving that station are operated by one TOC
  • none of the services using that station have tickets with time restrictions
 

mikkel

New Member
Joined
8 Oct 2011
Messages
2
Barriers are a good idea where the fare dodgers are concerned, but need to be manned during service times, to prevent jumpers, or two squeezing through on the one ticket, as I once saw on LUL.
 

Harlesden

Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
968
Location
LONDON NW10
Does Lincoln really need barriers? Not the busiest station on the network. Barriers need a rail employee in attendance. He/she could simply check tickets traditional style.
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,777
Location
South London
Does Lincoln really need barriers? Not the busiest station on the network. Barriers need a rail employee in attendance. He/she could simply check tickets traditional style.

One of the reasons they were installed at Lincoln was because the Guard couldn't get down the train and so streams of people were alighting at Lincoln and walking straight out. It was Central's own decision to gate Lincoln, not a franchise commitment.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
One of the reasons they were installed at Lincoln was because the Guard couldn't get down the train and so streams of people were alighting at Lincoln and walking straight out. It was Central's own decision to gate Lincoln, not a franchise commitment.

I thought it was EMT who did it after the refurbishment / track work?
 

Urban Gateline

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2011
Messages
1,667
The sooner Altnabreac gets gated, the better!

LOL you joker :lol:

I looked that station up on NRE and it's a tiny one in the countryside, looks harmless, a perfect example of a station NOT needing barriers, let alone ticket issuing facilities!
 

scotsman

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2010
Messages
3,252
LOL you joker :lol:

I looked that station up on NRE and it's a tiny one in the countryside, looks harmless, a perfect example of a station NOT needing barriers, let alone ticket issuing facilities!

One of the stations on the Kyle Line actually did get gated...to stop the sheep getting in - no joke!
 

Badger

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
617
Location
Wolverhampton
I seem to be the only one who doesn't fare dodge at Wolverhampton.

On board ticket inspections are a good idea where the fare dodgers are concerned.

Not when they walk down the train asking "any tickets from x?" without specifically pointing people out! Those with tickets show them, those without don't...

My favourite would be personal data chips which record our travel. Yes, I know, Big Brother State but think of how much more smoothly things would go. You would be able to preload tickets onto your chip for when you want to advance book; otherwise you'd get charged when and where you travel.

Personally I avoid ticket barriers whenever possible simply because I'm not good with people. While I always have a ticket, there are alternative ways into at least three major stations I visit which have hefty ticket barriers on the main entrance. Not gonna mention them though in case a van turns up outside with blue flashy lights.

I despise anybody who fare dodges unwittingly because people pay a lot to be where they are on trains and they take a lot of upkeep.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,910
Location
0036
I find ticket barriers acceptable at stations provided that:

  • all the trains serving that station are operated by one TOC
  • none of the services using that station have tickets with time restrictions

How many stations pass those criteria?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top