londonmidland
Established Member
810022 suffered from brake issues. It does beg the question as to just why there are so many brake issues with the 810s?
Dragging the rear wheels the technician said810022 suffered from brake issues. It does beg the question as to just why there are so many brake issues with the 810s?
RailRecord seems to have attributed the cancellation as just NM - Brake System Fault, no further breakdownBoth the next two (Sheffield and Notts) have passed us.
We have been told that an engineer is coming out.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
They can’t get it going so are going to deboard us at West Hampstead Thameslink.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Nearly two hours later and we’ve made it to….West Hampstead Thameslink and been de boarded
Looks like this is the 1D48 1905 service from St Pancras, but on National Rail it seems that it was cancelled at St Pancras? So I assume came in empty for you all. On another thread it's mentioned the 1835 unfortunately was also cancelled at Cricklewood - did your train make an additional stop there too?Dragging the rear wheels the technician said
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
A Meridian has just turned up
It came into West Hampstead Thameslink empty which I thought was strange.Looks like this is the 1D48 1905 service from St Pancras, but on National Rail it seems that it was cancelled at St Pancras? So I assume came in empty for you all. On another thread it's mentioned the 1835 unfortunately was also cancelled at Cricklewood - did your train make an additional stop there too?
Hope you make it to your destination soon!
I think this a very simplistic take on what is clearly a complex investigation. My layperson's reading of the interim report suggests RSSB think a combination of a fault with the AWS magnet on the track, and the train crew's response to an unexpected AWS alarm might be the issue why it came to a stand i.e. it doesn't look like they think there was a fault with the train itself.If 810015 hadn't had the TPWS intervention at Elstow then two more of EMR's fleet would have been in traffic today.
Yes 810010 810011 and 810016I think this a very simplistic take on what is clearly a complex investigation. My layperson's reading of the interim report suggests RSSB think a combination of a fault with the AWS magnet on the track, and the train crew's response to an unexpected AWS alarm might be the issue why it came to a stand i.e. it doesn't look like they think there was a fault with the train itself.
Back on topic: Only 3 Cl810s seem to be in service today ("Normal" seems to be 5-6).
There are extra Cl222 out (looks like 15) so no cancellations yet, thankfully.
014 too supposed to be out but failed problem with doors before working it's first service.Yes 810010 810011 and 810016
Surprised that is compliant to group standards but then we have GSMR radios that dont work when power is lost to the OLE.This is unfortunately a "known" issue with the 80x family. This time of year, having a set with regen braking is always a pain, as at 10mph the brakes release and then reapply with the friction brake. In slippy conditions this often causes a slide, and at a very crucial time in the station stop, especially when accurate stopping is required. I myself have had close calls in past couple of years and talking to colleagues im not alone. I'm not quite sure why regen brakes can't be switched off fleet wide throughout Autumn.
Almost certain.Any truth in the rumours coming out that some 222s are having lease extended due to the 810 introduction
Any truth in the rumours coming out that some 222s are having lease extended due to the 810 introduction
Almost certain.
Currently there are 9 available 810s which usually covers 6 diagrams (810006, 010-014, 016, 018 and 022) it's very unlikely a 7th diagram could run plus we have units 015 and 019 which have carried passengers not available. So 6/9 is best for now, there's no new passenger ready units available so the only way any more 222s can go is if the timetable gets reduced again. Our friend Liamf656 here will know more.
I think they're genuinely the last Franchises AwardedI have often wondered if the two worst TOCs XC and EMR also being the last to return to public ownership is a coincidence.
I cordially disagree. The problem for Govt of it happening now is that Govt cannot claim to have been unaware (1) that the 810s were very late; (2) that EMR was having problems delivering its IC service as far back as Summer 2025 and (3) knew that the service was crumbling in Summer 2026.If EMR services colapse isn't this a good thing for the government and GBR?
I cordially disagree. The problem for Govt of it happening now is that Govt cannot claim to have been unaware (1) that the 810s were very late; (2) that EMR was having problems delivering its IC service as far back as Summer 2025 and (3) knew that the service was crumbling in Summer 2026.
So to then feebly go "Our hands are tied. What on earth do you expect us to do? We're only the Government!" and then allow 222s off to Scotland after having sent 8 Cl221 off to XC would just look staggeringly incompetent.
On reflection, perhaps part of the reason DfT might have signed off on the Cl221 transfer to XC might be growing confidence that they won't be needed to rescue EMR?
East Midlands Railway (EMR) has been told by the government it needs to take "immediate action" to improve its performance before the service is renationalised.
- 12 October 2026
The Department for Transport (DfT) said it was expecting the rail operator to transfer into public ownership by the end of 2027.
Problems with EMR's new Aurora (Class 810) fleet led to months of delays, cancellations and overcrowding on services, as well as strike action by RMT union members.
The government has said the operator needs to do everything it can to resolve the issues as quickly as possible, to give passengers a "more reliable" service.
Renationalisation is part of the government's plan to improve rail infrastructure, cut train delays and improve experiences for passengers.
Will get my camera ready for a shot of them. at Wigston south Jn.Two of Grand Central 221s will be on a short-term lease to EMR, with these going into service probably in December. Full tender notice: https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/097228-2026
Well spotted!Two of Grand Central 221s will be on a short-term lease to EMR, with these going into service probably in December. Full tender notice: https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/097228-2026
My trusting soul would never think that they are playing both ends. Beat up current EMR to manage down expectations and then claim credit as and when things improveFurther to your post I noticed this on BBC East Mids - trying to make sure they don't get the blame for poor service when they take it over?
I keep seeing them in Derby area, off to Central Rivers for maintenanceWill get my camera ready for a shot of them. at Wigston south Jn.![]()
And relief, too, that they won’t have to pay for two fleets of trains for the same work for as long.I can imagine growing grumblings inside the corridors of Holyrood.
Handy for the Government to have a private operator to blame. If the same thing happens under GBR, it'll be more difficult to pass the political buck!Further to your post I noticed this on BBC East Mids - trying to make sure they don't get the blame for poor service when they take it over?
![]()
East Midlands Railway (EMR) told to improve ahead of renationalisation
The government expects the operator to transfer into public ownership by the end of 2027.www.bbc.co.uk
partial extract of the article:
I tend to agreeHandy for the Government to have a private operator to blame. If the same thing happens under GBR, it'll be more difficult to pass the political buck!