• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lewes derailment - Thursday 13th August

Deltic55

New Member
Joined
17 Oct 2018
Messages
1
Image from BBC said to be 1 hour before the incident. That would explain the previous train that went over this with a big jolt. (Image source: RAIB)

9651e6ba-8c38-4c65-b532-28e19a711807.jpg.webp
Does that look as if it is right over a culvert?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
Have the Newhaven aggregates trains been cancelled or have the gas the excitement of a reverse at Brighton?
A quick flick through RTT suggests no freight has run to/from Newhaven since the derailment.

Reversing at Brighton would face length issues, the need for a 2nd loco or propelling move, and route knowledge issues (i.e. probably getting a conductor in).
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
7,978
Location
Surrey
The RAIB have published an update establishing some basic information about what happened and outlining their lines of enquiry:



I've not included it in the above quote but there is an image of the track irregularity from the rear CCTV of a train prior to the incident train which does show quite a kink in the line.

Interesting that they haven't used the camera footage from 1F34 yet nor explicitly said the driver of 1F34 braked due sighting the track defect. The rear facing camera picture is from a preceding train (1F28) and there were two more trains that followed this before 1F34. Im pretty sure all trains have forward facing cameras these days although quality maybe variable on older electrostars so either they didnt or they didnt want to show them. They actually provided more information on Elstow in my view.

Anyhow comprehensive terms of reference but going to take a while to work through the investigation but there modus operandi more recently has been to issue an interim report so we will have to wait for that.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
Drat. Understandable but still drat.
2 circuits (1 DB to Marine and 1 GBRf to Town Yard) ran on the 13th, and both have an inbound and corresponding return on RTT, suggesting no trains were trapped.

When the derailment happened, 6O46 Hanwell Bridge Loop - Newhaven Day Aggregates (FLHH) was en-route and it last reported at Haywards Heath. It's not obvious from RTT where it then went, but other trains used platform 1 less than an hour after it arrived so presumably it either shunted to the sidings or was run to an alternative destination sharpish.
 

liam456

Member
Joined
6 May 2018
Messages
312
That is over underbridge 674, it has a path connecting Landport Road to another path that follows the course of the Ouse.

It's also what connects the main working compound to the actual derailment site which are on opposite sides of the railway formation in this location.
 

978wta

Member
Joined
5 Dec 2017
Messages
135
Location
Huddersfield
Does anyone know if the rescue locos are just taking the single lead unit or the coach from the 2nd unit that didn’t derail too?
 

SouthernOne

Member
Joined
6 Apr 2018
Messages
72
Location
Brighton
2 circuits (1 DB to Marine and 1 GBRf to Town Yard) ran on the 13th, and both have an inbound and corresponding return on RTT, suggesting no trains were trapped.

When the derailment happened, 6O46 Hanwell Bridge Loop - Newhaven Day Aggregates (FLHH) was en-route and it last reported at Haywards Heath. It's not obvious from RTT where it then went, but other trains used platform 1 less than an hour after it arrived so presumably it either shunted to the sidings or was run to an alternative destination sharpish.
It was berthed at Copyhold Junction a driver told me, close to an access gate
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,477
That is over underbridge 674, it has a path connecting Landport Road to another path that follows the course of the Ouse.

It's also what connects the main working compound to the actual derailment site which are on opposite sides of the railway formation in this location.
It's the one in the bottom left image on this page, I think:


I've walked under it a few times.
 

Deepgreen

Established Member
Joined
12 Jun 2013
Messages
7,457
Location
Gomshall, Surrey
BBC News has an updated story, incuding CCTV from a previous train, which shows a slight kink in the track and what appears to be a similar kink in the other line's track, albeit less severe.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gx12v8z51o

A defect was found on railway tracks in East Sussex at the site where a train derailed leaving 30 injured, a report says.

Initial findings from the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) found an "irregularity" with the tracks near Lewes where three carriages tumbled down an embankment last Thursday.

The RAIB, which is continuing to investigate the derailment, said it had received "several reports of rough riding at the location of the derailment from passengers on other trains".

Network Rail and Greater Thameslink Railway, whose Southern Rail train was involved in the crash, said in a joint statement they were "sorry this happened on our railway".

Investigators from the RAIB have said CCTV from a train which passed through the crash site at 14:04 BST showed the "irregularity" with the track geometry just before the point where the train came off the tracks.

Screenshot 2026-08-19 at 20.23.50.png
 

CB Root

Member
Joined
11 Jun 2025
Messages
12
Location
Doncaster
Out of curiosity, I've never considered this before, but how DO you self-evacuate from a carriage which is on its side ? Is it a question of breaking a window above your head and climbing ? Not sure I'd like to have to try it in the event of a fire (though I assume that there's not a huge amount of flammables on an electric train...), or indeed if water was rising !!
 

pokemonsuper9

Established Member
Joined
20 Dec 2022
Messages
4,583
Location
Greater Manchester
Out of curiosity, I've never considered this before, but how DO you self-evacuate from a carriage which is on its side ?
Out the front or back would probably be my first thought, if your carriage is separated a gangway corridor would be open.
or yes climbing out the top is an option (you could use the emergency door open rather than breaking a window), but obviously climbing requires strength plenty would not have.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
2,129
It's the one in the bottom left image on this page, I think:


I've walked under it a few times.

The geology and effects of water may be significant- I believe the Lewes area is 'interesting', with chalk, sandstone, clay and 'stream erosion'. The Victorians have bequethed to us significant earthworks to which we have given inadequate, and reducing, attention, and expenditure. There are many examples of consequential failures.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
Very interesting, turns out to be Newhaven Marine after all.

Best as I can work out:
- ECS runs to Newhaven (5Z55)
- Light loco follows from Lewes to attach on London End at Newhaven (0Z55), Country end loco Detaches. Presumably the front loco from the 2 that have performed the rescue will shunt clear but not clear how!
- ECS moves to Brighton, detaches loco on blocks. loco detached at Newhaven runs light from Newhaven to attach on (now) London End to haul it to Selhurst (0Z56
- Loco on blocks follows light to Haywards heath (0Z57), not clear what the next onward movement would be.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,657
Location
SW London
That is over underbridge 674, it has a path connecting Landport Road to another path that follows the course of the Ouse.

It's also what connects the main working compound to the actual derailment site which are on opposite sides of the railway formation in this location.
Is it possible the distortion couid be due to a bridge strike?
 

jopop

New Member
Joined
4 Feb 2016
Messages
2
Very interesting, turns out to be Newhaven Marine after all.

Best as I can work out:
- ECS runs to Newhaven (5Z55)
- Light loco follows from Lewes to attach on London End at Newhaven (0Z55), Country end loco Detaches. Presumably the front loco from the 2 that have performed the rescue will shunt clear but not clear how!
- ECS moves to Brighton, detaches loco on blocks. loco detached at Newhaven runs light from Newhaven to attach on (now) London End to haul it to Selhurst (0Z56
- Loco on blocks follows light to Haywards heath (0Z57), not clear what the next onward movement would be.
I think both locos haul it to newhaven marine, then one runs arround to haul to Brighton the other detaches to follow behind to Brighton.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,490
Location
DTOS A or B
Very interesting, turns out to be Newhaven Marine after all.

Best as I can work out:
- ECS runs to Newhaven (5Z55)
- Light loco follows from Lewes to attach on London End at Newhaven (0Z55), Country end loco Detaches. Presumably the front loco from the 2 that have performed the rescue will shunt clear but not clear how!
- ECS moves to Brighton, detaches loco on blocks. loco detached at Newhaven runs light from Newhaven to attach on (now) London End to haul it to Selhurst (0Z56
- Loco on blocks follows light to Haywards heath (0Z57), not clear what the next onward movement would be.
seems like a lot of moves, you not top and tail the 47's from Newhaven.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
seems like a lot of moves, you not top and tail the 47's from Newhaven.
It does seem odd, but that's what seems to be in the plan:
5Z55 Lewes to Selhurst via Newhaven Marine and Brighton: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:07716/2026-08-19/detailed
0Z55 Lewes to Newhaven Marine: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:07717/2026-08-19/detailed
0Z56 Newhaven Marine to Brighton: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:07718/2026-08-19/detailed
0Z57 Brighton to Haywards Heath: https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:07721/2026-08-20/detailed
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,249
I guess they can haul a unit using the emergency coupler between locomotive and unit, but can't haul a locomotive on the back using an emergency coupler between the unit and locomotive, or can't get the air brake through to the second locomotive.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
I guess they can haul a unit using the emergency coupler between locomotive and unit, but can't haul a locomotive on the back using an emergency coupler between the unit and locomotive, or can't get the air brake through to the second locomotive.
The air brake being unavailable would make a lot of sense as the ECS is also timed with a lot of pathing/engineering in it.

0Z55 has shunted from platform 1 to platform 5 at Lewes ready for 5Z55 to leave.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,941
Location
London
Difficult to tell but could the appearance of distortion on the up line be due to the effects of heat haze, it being hot and sunny at the time?

Sure it could, but I doubt RAIB would have come out and said this without being sure about what they are reporting. They don't tend to deal in "maybes" and take great care in their statements.
 

mickey

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2010
Messages
668
Out the front or back would probably be my first thought, if your carriage is separated a gangway corridor would be open.
or yes climbing out the top is an option (you could use the emergency door open rather than breaking a window), but obviously climbing requires strength plenty would not have.
Doesn’t every unit carry a ladder for this purpose? Some definitely have it visible to the public, am assuming others do but in a cupboard somewhere.
 

Top