Peter Sarf
Established Member
All plausible / reasonable.Having to, is probably not strictly correct.
If they are leasing them anyway, then they are choosing (rather than having to) not to use them and store them. In theory whilst they are on the books and available, they could keep using them and transfer the 450s to mainline work, or if they don't have crowded services that need strengthening store some 450s instead.
Yes. I doubt the ROSCo for the 458/4s have an easy alternative use for the 458s.At the moment SWR appear to be leasing, but not using about 220 coaches (170 class 701, and around 50 class 458). There is element of standardisation (and shoddy service ready condition of 701/5 so can't yet be used) but there is a financial cost of having this stock. And which is least worst cost, to store or return. There has been no takers to sub-lease them to another operator either.
(worse still for the 458/5s which are now definitely a "micro fleet").
I remember way back it was said that the Desirios were expensive to lease (and buy) generally. I have always believed you get what you pay for and Siemens products do seem to be good quality. So I would assume 458/4s are most likely cheaper to lease than 450s. I also remember it was said that SWT (Stagecoach) were ending up paying extra for a higher availability of 450s to cover planned extra uses. There was a clause in the lease of 450s that allowed for above expected/agreed/contracted use (logical as Northam depot would have to work harder to attain higher availability / miles). How true this all is I cannot now be sure as I don't recall the source (probably Modern Railways).I am not clear if a 458 or a 450 is cheaper to operate, both require maintenance at mileage intervals, but which is cheaper to use over next 12 months until lease expires is not obvious.
I assume that could be logical for most leases with of course penalties if the original service level was not reached.
So I have always had at the back of my mind that SWR would desire to ease of on the 450s intensive use. Obviously Covid reduced that pressure so the 442s went and now the 458/4s (but is the idea that the 458/4s are going merely an assumption we are making). While 701s become standard on suburban duties.
Conjecture territory :-
You have made me think. These 458s could be a bargaining chip to get a better deal on 450 leases. If the allegedly high basic lease on 450s could be reduced that would be sensible. If not then does a small (not quite "micro") fleet of 458s become cheaper and we see a dozen or so 450s handed back to the ROSCO.
On maintenance space I think Bournemouth is said to be the home for the 458s. But I am a bit puzzled as that is far from suburban land, but then the 458/4s were supposed to be batting up and down the Portsmouth direct by now !.It might even be as simple as trying to free up maintenance space at Wimbledon so they can take on remaining 701s, whereas 450s are Northam's responsibility
(certainly is home for the out of use 458/4s !).