• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Looking at transport safety budgets as a whole?

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,674
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To the mods, I'm not sure if this is best in here, in Other Transport or in General so feel free to move accordingly (as I'm sure you will :) ).

This would certainly work, though the huge cost might save more lives were it spent on fixing road junctions with high numbers of serious accidents.

But that would be a different budget…

In reality. It seems we may have been trapped by the ever present. “But ETCS is coming soon to fix that.”

I have wondered if transport safety should really be looked at as a whole, and in what way spending might be different if it was? For instance, might more lives be saved by spending on road junctions and cycle provision than TPWS grids? Or might lowering rail fares and adding cheap capacity (i.e. new basic rolling stock) save lives by getting people to switch from road to rail?

Any thoughts on how this could work?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,348
Well, I think this could quite easily lead to the result "all transport safety spending is better spent on building more dual carriageways as they make road travel much safer".
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,674
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Well, I think this could quite easily lead to the result "all transport safety spending is better spent on building more dual carriageways as they make road travel much safer".

There's a good chance that it would improve justification for some bypasses both in terms of reducing accidents and in terms of air quality in urban areas, yes. But people do still crash on 70mph duals...
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,348
There's a good chance that it would improve justification for some bypasses both in terms of reducing accidents and in terms of air quality in urban areas, yes. But people do still crash on 70mph duals...
The death rate is something like a quarter of other roads per mile though.

Outside that, I think you might get some counterintuitive results.
The vast majority of fatalities on the railway are suicide-related, so suicide prevention would probably come out quite well.

I wouldn't be surprised if a programme of platform edge doors did quite well on a cost benefit analysis.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,674
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The vast majority of fatalities on the railway are suicide-related, so suicide prevention would probably come out quite well.

That's probably why the key mainlines all now have fences on the fast lines. It's fairly costly but has saved a lot of lives by being a visual deterrent despite the fact that on routes like the WCML they can't be locked as trains do sometimes stop on the fasts. "Being where you feel like you're not meant to be" is a surprisingly good deterrent even if in poor mental health, and it also gives a chance for staff to be able to notice people in that position before anything bad happens.
 

JohnofWessex

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2026
Messages
152
Location
frome
Traffic Policing and on the spot licence cancellations for some motoring offences?

Drink/Drug driving and exceeding 90mph
 

Zomboid

Established Member
Joined
2 Apr 2025
Messages
2,310
Location
Oxford
Roads are statistically far more dangerous. Effective road safety measures are likely to save far more lives than more TPWS grids.
 

Top