In other words, yes you believe that a system of split ticketing is the simplest solution.I think the issue there is that if you want a simple fare system, then that fare system isn't going to be able to take into account the specifics of each individual train. We generally charge more for travel before (roughly) 9:30am because most trains across the UK are busier during that period. Charging more (including restricting railcard availability) during that period serves two purposes: It deters people from travelling on many of the most crowded trains, thereby freeing up those trains for people who have to travel at those times. And it maximises revenue by charging more for commuters who are essentially a captured market and more willing to pay more. As you identify there are a minority of routes where trains are actually more crowded later in the morning, and for those trains you could argue that the higher rush hour fares are not helpful. But since those are a minority of trains, it's still the case that overall across the country the higher rush hour fares probably do more good than harm.
You could try having special different rules for those particular trains to reflect their crowding patterns but then you'll end up with a complicated fare system that no-one understands. That's already too much of a problem with all sorts of different restrictions on different routes. Or you could go the other way and just lose rush hour fares and restrictions altogether - but in much of the country that would just exacerbate the problem of rush hour trains being too crowded. That seems to me to suggest that keeping peak hour restrictions, but simplifying them so the rules are more consistent everywhere, is the least bad solution.
The thing is, no-one can agree on what simple means; some people think that not needing to split, but you disagree. That's fine; I'm not even arguing one way or another
It will ensure the retention of the current system of people who book through sites such as Trainsplit, rather than booking direct, pay lower fares for longer journeys, whether people see that as good or bad, that is one way of market segmentation.
Absolutely it is this.Given some of the comments on how poor the survey seems to be laid out, my take is that it’s either a kite flying exercise, or a prelude to “consultation” on the matter prior to a predetermined decision being implemented.
They have already made their mind up and are trying to find justification by cherry picking the results of a deliberately misleading survey.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
That's not legal. Was there a thread at the time? I'm sure that if certain knowledgeable contributors had seen it, they would have provided advice on how to handle any such attempt to renege on the deal.When morning peak restriction were introduced for the Dales Railcard, the changes were applied to existing, as well as new, railcard holders. I seem to recall that if you complained about it then Northern offered to cancel and refund your existing railcard.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I believe it's intentionally this way.I am no simpleton but I found this survey one of the most poorly designed I have seen in a long time. I gave up in the end-life is too short
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
I agree, except the rail industry is not run to full seats or provide a public service. The aim of train companies is purely to maximise revenue of those who do travel, and also disregard any potential lost revenue from people who are deferred from travelling.I don't have a Senior Railcard (it's not long until I qualify, mind!) but we do have a 2Together railcard which of course has the 9.30am restriction on weekdays.
When I travel solo I often end up on early weekday trains that are basically carting around fresh air. Very early northbound departures from Kings Cross spring to mind - I've been on the 0640 Harrogate, the 0645 Lincoln and the 0733 Newcastle recently and they're basically empty. Surely these are the sorts of train that you'd want to fill up? If you can get there early, the 0645 is perfect for a day trip to Lincoln and the 0733 for a trip to York, etc.
I believe the Government are more than happy for people to choose to drive instead, as this increases fuel duty revenues as well as reducing the need for additional stock at the busiest times; the Government doesn't want 'too many' people to travel by rail, because that incurs costs.
There is certainly no attempt to get people off roads and onto the rails, as there is in more progressive countries.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Quite.So leisure journeys, including long distance trips for stays away are only taken after 09:30. Really???
Indeed if I am booking York to London for a senior Railcard holder, for a leisure journey, I will aim to book them on a pre-0930 train because they will be quieter.
The people who support or condone this proposal are missing the bigger picture.
Also, just in case anyone is in any doubt, the powers that be absolutely want to similarly restrict other railcards, such as the 16-25 Railcard and many more. The only one they daren't not mess with is the Disabled Railcard.
Last edited: