-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Diesel running under wires on the ECML north of York?
- Thread starter Dan G
- Start date
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
The Planner
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 19,624
Its an issue on both the ECML and WCML.
dodecahedron67
Member
It’s Chathill to Longniddry that is the problem section on the ECML
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,227
Very true. There’s a half built SFC feeder station major upgrade at Marshall Meadows, just north of Berwick, that was mothballed part built. Was designed specifically to overcome the power capacity issues in the area, and was discussed at length in the ECML power upgrade thread.
a recent Q&A here:
Why do TPE 802's operating Edinburgh to Berwick-upon-Tweed and Newcastle run on diesel?
Why do TPE 802's operating Edinburgh to Berwick-upon-Tweed and Newcastle run on diesel when the whole route is electrified?
www.railforums.co.uk
the main ECML Upgrade here:
ECML Power Supply Upgrade
The planned ECML South upgrade to autotransformer feeding was (almost) entirely descoped to boosterless classic feeding. The requirement for insulated ATF runs because of possession arrangements with respect to the ECML's non-bidi paired-by-direction configuration may have been a factor in that...
www.railforums.co.uk
might be best to search on “Marshall Meadows” in the latter thread.
Last edited:
Interesting links, thank you.
Reading between the lines a little bit, does that mean that an electric train takes half an hour to travel through that section, and the supply is only sufficient for one train at a time (in each direction)?
Reading between the lines a little bit, does that mean that an electric train takes half an hour to travel through that section, and the supply is only sufficient for one train at a time (in each direction)?
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
And although we in the enthusiast community maybe understanding, it is not a good advert for electrification.
Oh yes, I've now found a pdf of an ORR licence restriction on TPE to that effect
No, as above there is a potential issue Chathill to Longniddry so the TPE Newcastle - Edinburgh are in general pathed on diesel in that area, search for Reston RTT as below;
"https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/service/gb-nr:W85787/2026-05-20/detailed#allox_id=0".
There are two LNER London - Edinburgh services through that area every hour within a few minutes which are pathed on electric even when one of them is a Bi-mode set heading for Aberdeen/Inverness.
"https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/detailed/gb-nr:RSN/2026-05-20/1048".
If there are supply issues or a train fault then there maybe more diesel running but that just keeps the trains moving with minimal delay.
zwk500
Veteran Member
Indeed, although it is also an important highlight that electrification is not as simple as just putting wires up. Which is an impression given by some industry press/personalities.
The issue is evidently power supply. The implication is only two trains can be powered in that section at the same time
As below from 14/05/26 three LNER electric 801's pass Reston within four minutes, this happens hourly during the day with none of the LNER's pathed on diesel even when Bi-modes are used.
"https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/se...-05-14/1427?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=GR"
In the past LNER ran four trains per hour in total but some were HST's so that reduced demand on the power supply by default, the same is happening now but to a much lesser extend with the TPE's only run two hourly so it's not that much of an issue. Do they actually run on diesel anyway?
dk1
Veteran Member
Yes of course. Been like this several years. Ongoing feeder boosts will eventually solve the issue.
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,227
One of the underlying reasons TPE run on diesel is to allow Lumo to run on overhead. IIRC the latter service, although not yet started at the time TPE introduced their stopper, was already approved by ORR.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
For some incredibly low level of ‘ongoing’ - unless you have recent news of a restart?
dk1
Veteran Member
No just assumed it was ongoing. Oh well.
zwk500
Veteran Member
I think it is still "ongoing" but very slow - this appears to be the most recent post of actual progress on the PSU: https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/ecml-power-supply-upgrade.190071/page-15#post-7559622
dk1
Veteran Member
Thank you.
zwk500
Veteran Member
Yes, the March Enhancements Delivery Programme confirms it's still being progressed, now aiming for May 2027, so 3 years 3 months after first projected...:
This appears to be the LinkedIN page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/real-power-supply-upgrade/about/
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,227
Please note though that the output column in that EDP table doesn’t mention north of Newcastle.
zwk500
Veteran Member
It doesn't, but the LinkedIn page does:
Between that and the Scotland EDP not having been updated since July 2022, and no Upgrades are mentioned for Berwick-Edinburgh on the Scotland's Railway website, it's difficult to know if the project has actually descoped, or if it's just crawling along, or some other thing, from publicly available info.
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,227
Thanks for adding that, I couldn’t see the LinkIn details. Normally their links have opened for me ok, but not that one. I don’t see ‘Scotlands Railway’ having any skin in the game though, if only it had been originally built a mile up the road…
Last edited:
GraphitProjekt
Member
It's hard to tell because press release posts like this tend to warp time around. The new 132kV connections at Hambleton Junction and indeed the dual set of SFC equipment have been in operation for a while but are mentioned in the present tense. In the bullet point list they say "2 New SFC compounds at 132kV supply connection points". This could refer to Hambleton Junction's dual equipment or to the idea of 2 new SFC feeder stations which would mean Marshall Meadows. And all that is if their wording can be faithfully depended upon as completely accurate to whatever interpretation they meant.
In short, I'll believe it when I see it.
TrainViation
Member
Why is it that the Marshall Meadows upgrade was paused and hasn’t resumed since?
swt_passenger
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 34,227
That was never satisfactorily answered in the main ECML upgrade discussion thread. I doubt DfT even considered it worthy of an official explanation…