• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Power Issues near Hemel Hempstead 07/05/2026

Status
Not open for further replies.

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,635
Location
Crewe
Just to confirm that this morning's incident was 1N00 hitting a P-Way trolley. Not related to the knitting being pulled down.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

GuyGibsonVC

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2019
Messages
232
Location
Up North
Just to confirm that this morning's incident was 1N00 hitting a P-Way trolley. Not related to the knitting being pulled down.

Not just an trolley but an Ironman which are around 150kg and can carry up to 1.5 tonnes. They are usually used for shifting rail, crossings etc.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,635
Location
Crewe
Not just an trolley but an Ironman which are around 150kg and can carry up to 1.5 tonnes. They are usually used for shifting rail, crossings etc.
Indeed, though the ironman is now in several pieces and would struggle to carry anything of note
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,560
Location
Lichfield
Just to confirm that this morning's incident was 1N00 hitting a P-Way trolley. Not related to the knitting being pulled down.

I just can't get my head around how the people that are meant to be responsible for the safe upkeep and operation of the rail infrastructure can leave something like that on the track, with the potential to cause a major accident.

Looking at pictures of them, they are bright yellow, how can it be missed?

Permaquip-28957-Ironman-CW-Lift-Equip-SWL-Studio-Action.webp
 

GuyGibsonVC

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2019
Messages
232
Location
Up North
I just can't get my head around how the people that are meant to be responsible for the safe upkeep and operation of the rail infrastructure can leave something like that on the track, with the potential to cause a major accident.

Looking at pictures of them, they are bright yellow, how can it be missed?

Permaquip-28957-Ironman-CW-Lift-Equip-SWL-Studio-Action.webp

At this risk of going off topic, there will be an investigation.

Planning, competence, communication, fatigue, paperwork, human factors and more will be looked at.
 

SCDR_WMR

Established Member
Joined
17 Dec 2017
Messages
2,635
Location
Crewe
I just can't get my head around how the people that are meant to be responsible for the safe upkeep and operation of the rail infrastructure can leave something like that on the track, with the potential to cause a major accident.

Looking at pictures of them, they are bright yellow, how can it be missed?

Permaquip-28957-Ironman-CW-Lift-Equip-SWL-Studio-Action.webp
The photo of the trolley (destroyed) I have doesn't look anywhere near as substantial as that, but it is bright yellow and should not be left unaccounted for when closing a work area down!
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,560
Location
Lichfield
At this risk of going off topic, there will be an investigation.

Planning, competence, communication, fatigue, paperwork, human factors and more will be looked at.

Yeah, great, until it happens again.

This is all well and good and ticks the "we've done something" box and I'm sure "lessons will be learnt"....
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
6,035
The photo of the trolley (destroyed) I have doesn't look anywhere near as substantial as that, but it is bright yellow and should not be left unaccounted for when closing a work area down!
Is there any indication of whether it was left actually on the track (which would have been an extraordinary oversight), or whether it had been taken off track but left without sufficient clearance? That would still have been a serious mistake, but perhaps easier to understand how it might have happened.
 

sharpener

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2018
Messages
397
Is there any indication of whether it was left actually on the track (which would have been an extraordinary oversight), or whether it had been taken off track but left without sufficient clearance? That would still have been a serious mistake, but perhaps easier to understand how it might have happened.

Or perhaps it was stowed well out of the way but vandals thought it would be a wizard wheeze to re-rail it and watch the fun?
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
6,035
Or perhaps it was stowed well out of the way but vandals thought it would be a wizard wheeze to re-rail it and watch the fun?
I can't find the reference now, but I think it was reported as having been hit at around 0500 after overnight work had taken place. Which doesn't make vandalism impossible, but it's probably not a very likely time slot for miscreants to be about and up to no good.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,726
I can't find the reference now, but I think it was reported as having been hit at around 0500 after overnight work had taken place. Which doesn't make vandalism impossible, but it's probably not a very likely time slot for miscreants to be about and up to no good.
I would have thought that was the ideal time, very few people about and less likely to be caught, if that was the case. I can't imagine a lot of the grafitti is done in the day time.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,560
Location
Lichfield
Or perhaps it was stowed well out of the way but vandals thought it would be a wizard wheeze to re-rail it and watch the fun?

It was quoted as being 150kg in weight earlier in this thread, and hit at 5am, presumably not long after work had finished, while vandals are possibility, it's a very slim possibility.

Let's not start making excuses for why a serious safety breach almost certainly caused by the people responsible for the safe upkeep of the railways can't possibly be responsible.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,382
Location
Cumbria, UK
From memory Bourne End is literally the border between Euston and Bletchley DUs so I would expect probably 2hrs response time for OHL teams from Stonebridge or Bletchley (possibly both at some point given the damage) and that would be if they weren’t out somewhere else in the area on routine maintenance.
I have no idea as to the extent of the damage to both lines but logic would (?) say less on the UFL than the DFL so maybe the focus could have been to look to repair that on Thursday night and possibly re-open the DFL only to diesel traffic ready for a full repair Saturday night. Again, no idea to the full extent but have done this in the past on the WCML
Passed through on the 1620 to Manchester and saw that the wire south of the break was down on the down fast but the end of the wire was lying across the up fast. The up fast wiring looked to be unaffected. I didn’t see the broken wire north of the break.
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
3,582
Location
Lancashire
Let's not start making excuses for why a serious safety breach almost certainly caused by the people responsible for the safe upkeep of the railways can't possibly be responsible.
You appear to have a singular dislike of Network Rail, is there reason for this attitude ?
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,560
Location
Lichfield
You appear to have a singular dislike of Network Rail, is there reason for this attitude ?

It's not a dislike, more that I don't believe that any organization that is responsible for the safety of thousands of people on a daily basis should be immune from criticism.

Or would you rather we brush their failings under the carpet?
 

Omnishambles

Member
Joined
13 Jul 2019
Messages
214
It's not a dislike, more that I don't believe that any organization that is responsible for the safety of thousands of people on a daily basis should be immune from criticism.

Or would you rather we brush their failings under the carpet?
Agree shouldn’t be immune from criticism but should also be accountable by the ORR more effectively as I see, still today, possession irregularities such as this appears to be (investigation tbc) as well as regularly trains striking site boards or protection placed on incorrect and open lines.
 

SansHache

Member
Joined
31 Mar 2015
Messages
182
Location
Manchester
accelleration of which component in which direction?
Apologies for the delay in responding, the accelerometers are usually mounted on or close to the pantograph head and measure in all three axes (vertical, longitudinal and lateral). Excessive vertical shocks may indicate a "hard spot" at registration supports, longitudinal shocks will detect a discontinuity in the contact wire, such as a worn insulator as entering a neutral section. The accelerometer output is transmitted to ground in real-time and the characteristics of the plot are often a strong indication of the type of defect. This analysis is supported by the video images that are captured at the time of the event.
GPS locations for high impact events are recorded and these usually include reference to the closest overhead line structure.
 

ChilliSauce

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2025
Messages
328
You appear to have a singular dislike of Network Rail, is there reason for this attitude ?
Not wishing to go off topic but this I believe is a clear example of an infrastructure owner / controller failing to take their responsibilities seriously.

In this instance they put at risk the travelling public.

I also believe The headline is actually wrong as it states a "Wrong side failure" where as it was actually more serious as it was an "Unprotected Wrong Side Failure"
 

Attachments

  • 1 wingfield.png
    1 wingfield.png
    439.3 KB · Views: 90

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,385
Not just a trolley but an Ironman which are around 150kg and can carry up to 1.5 tonnes. They are usually used for shifting rail, crossings etc.
Off topic, but hearing there was a similar incident on swr involving a class 159 today; resulting in an evacuation of the train.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top