Howardh
Established Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2011
- Messages
- 9,796
So virtually no one is going to choose Lumo. The seats on avanti and TPE will be far superior and it will be quieter as they are electric.I have to travel Bolton to Carlisle on Fri 19 June - looked at Lumo Preston > Carlisle - single with r/c; more than twice as much as TPE or Avanti
Screenshot shows Avanti £7.95 (advance) whereas Lumo is £19.20
So virtually no one is going to choose Lumo. The seats on avanti and TPE will be far superior and it will be quieter as they are electric.
Agreed there, as they are only running 6 coach trains (all be standard class), they will be more interested in longer distance sales than shorter journeys.Lumo are probably more interested in London-Scotland (principally London-Glasgow) and London-Preston traffic and will not be too bothered about clogging up seats with short distance passengers unless they are sure they won't sell them for longer distance trips. With only short units they have to be more bothered about this than Avanti.
It wouldn't surprise me to see Advances released for this journey much nearer the time once they have established the longer distance demand.
The West Coast services won't serve GlasgowLumo are probably more interested in London-Scotland (principally London-Glasgow)
The West Coast services won't serve Glasgow
In time, I'm sure.Will the Lumo + SWR only fares for East Coast services (e.g. Newcastle – Southampton) be extended to WCML services?
Revenue generation, surely? Rather than protection. If it's a fare that only exists to cook the books when calculating settlements.The Anytime fares (e.g. for Crewe to Preston) serve no real purpose except for revenue protection and prosecutions purposes.
It is somewhat odd that those are still being offered given SWR's nationalisation. It would appear absurd for them to be offered once GBR is established, and Lumo is a direct competitor that it will be in the nationalised railway's interests to take out of business.Many new Lumo+[TOC] fares are still being set for the ECML operations even in recent months.
I'm sure someone could build an anti-competitive case against them if they did that, saying they are abusing their monopolistic market position or something.it will be in the nationalised railway's interests to take out of business.
Correct. Announced by Rail Staff Travel on 28th April.I am hearing rumours that Lumo West Coast have agreed to accept free/priv rail staff. This is excellent news for their own employees too if true.
Many thanks for that. I’d only heard it along the grapevine but good to know it’s officiaL.Correct. Announced by Rail Staff Travel on 28th April.
Priv discounts are also available for those who don't have free travel, including RST Online Leisure Card (i.e. Network Rail) holders, which isn't usually the case for Open Access Operators.
Somebody asked on X yesterday as to whether the West Midlands Ranger was valid but it was not.Any plans for the Preston-Carlisle section to be included in the North West Rover?
Lumo do accept the North East Rover between Newcastle and Morpeth so they clearly aren't opposed to the idea.
Chances are that until that tweet nobody at Lumo really considered someone using the WM Ranger from Nuneaton to Crewe as it's a niche use case, and since they're an OAO they can choose to not bother with these things as they don't generate any extra revenue.Somebody asked on X yesterday as to whether the West Midlands Ranger was valid but it was not.
Agreed, it just creates more disjointedness. Grand Central and Hull Trains seem to have opted out all rover tickets if the RailRover site is anything to go by, despite no compulsory reservations. HT's case is particularly odd since Lumo, also a FirstGroup venture, does accept most relevant rovers on its ECML route.The idea that TOCs can opt out of accepting an interavailable ticket, when they are a Train Company participating in the NRCoT and it is not a restriction shown on the ticket, is highly questionable.
Can Lumo unilaterally do that? I don't believe they can choose not to accept any permitted tickets and aiui most rangers (including the WM day ranger) are unrestricted area tickets.Somebody asked on X yesterday as to whether the West Midlands Ranger was valid but it was not.
Can Lumo unilaterally do that?
Oh they most certainly can. Many including some normal operators like XC will not accept localised ranger style tickets or group save. Thankfully all accept free & priv rail staff travel.Can Lumo unilaterally do that? I don't believe they can choose not to accept any permitted tickets and aiui most rangers (including the WM day ranger) are unrestricted area tickets.
At the start, Grand Central did not accept free & priv staff travel presumably because they did not include their own staff in the arrangements.Oh they most certainly can. Many including some normal operators like XC will not accept localised ranger style tickets or group save. Thankfully all accept free & priv rail staff travel.
Yes I remember that well. Why penalise your own staff? Never understood that attitude. Thankfully common sense prevailed.At the start, Grand Central did not accept free & priv staff travel presumably because they did not include their own staff in the arrangements.
Curiously, possibly after a while, there was also an arrangement that if you asked the train manager to be accommodated and they agreed you could travel. On the few occasions I tried (e.g., a Lincoln divert by HST) I was always willingly accepted.
Lots of rangers/rovers have operator restrictions so I imagine they can.
However, while I understand that most people who use these ticket types know where to look for such information, I have long since believed there should be a better system in place for advertising validity at the point of purchase/on the ticket. Similar to the nre links to advertise time restrictions.
But it is not a restriction shown on the ticket. How the average person is supposed to know that they can't actually take all the trains in the area of validity is unclear to me and I very much doubt it complies with the NRCoT.![]()
West Midlands Day Ranger | National Rail
Special offer: West Midlands Day Ranger. The portal into UK rail travel, including information on ticket purchase and promotions, train times and delays, and more.www.nationalrail.co.uk
Ah there is a list of allowed operators. Fair enough.
Yes they are. Ironically they are not valid into or out of London Kings Cross or Euston before 10:00 Mon-Fri on LNER or Avanti but none of the OA operators are mentioned in that restriction.What about All Line Rovers? Are they accepted on Lumo West Coast?
Grand Central doesn't have any Bradford services at King's Cross before 10:00 on weekdays, only one (northbound) Sunderland one, only two northbound and one southbound Hull Trains ones would be affected, and only one Lumo service per route per direction. I'd suspect that any first class ALR users would be likelier to use open-access operators for the experience / for rarer track rather than all the way from London to Doncaster etc. and would prefer to get better value from the tickets with complimentary Avanti or LNER meals.Yes they are. Ironically they are not valid into or out of London Kings Cross or Euston before 10:00 Mon-Fri on LNER or Avanti but none of the OA operators are mentioned in that restriction.